바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of School Psychology

메뉴

A Person-Centered Analysis of Achievement Goal Orientations for Gifted and Non-Gifted 7th Graders

Abstract

This study examined whether distinct student profiles emerged from achievement goal orientations in Korean samples of the gifted and non-gifted 7th graders. Additionally, profile differences in terms of self-efficacy and academic burnout were scrutinized, as well as differences in student profiles by gender and giftedness. Four groups of students with unique achievement goal orientation profiles were identified by a cluster analysis: (a) success-oriented(31.3%), (b) mastery-oriented(22.3%), (c) typical(35.1%), and (d) disengaged(11.3%) profiles. The profile difference between gender groups was not a statistically significant, but between the giftedenss groups. Observed differences in self-efficacy and academic burnout indicated that goals related to self-improvement and active engagement with learning were positively related to self- efficacy, whereas avoidance tendencies and disengaged types were negatively associated with psychological well-being. Findings demonstrate the importance of including measures of leaners' self-efficacy and psychological well-being, when evaluating the role of achievement goal orientations in learning and achievement. Finally, the usefulness of a person-centered approach in understanding groups of learners with different types of needs and problems was discussed.

keywords
achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, academic burnout, cluster analysis, a person-centered approach, gifted students, 성취목표지향성, 자기효능감, 학업소진, 군집분석, 개인-중심적 접근, 영재

Reference

1.

곽미숙 (2009). 초등학생의 성취목표 지향 프로파일 분석. 전북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

2.

국중학 (2009). 고등학생의 성취목표 지향 프로파일 분석. 전북대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

3.

김아영 (1997). 학구적 실패에 대한 내성의 관련 변인. 교육심리연구, 11, 1-19.

4.

김아영 (2002). 자기효능감과 학습동기. 교육방법학회, 16(1), 1-38.

5.

김유진 (2009). 성취목표지향 프로파일에 따른 자기조절학습 및 학업성취의 차이분석. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

6.

나동진 (2010). 영재와 일반학생의 성취목표지향의 비교. 교육학 연구, 48(3), 25-44.

7.

박병기, 이종욱 (2005). 2*2 성취목표지향성 척도의 개발 및 타당화. 교육심리연구, 19 (1), 327-352.

8.

신현숙, 류정희, 안정은 (2010). 성취목표지향성 프로파일에 따른 중학생의 학습기술과 학업성취도의 차이. 교육학 연구, 48(2), 45-66.

9.

양명희, 오종철 (2006). 2×2성취목표지향성과 자기조절학습과의 관련성 검토. 교육심리연구, 20(3), 745-764.

10.

영재교육진흥법 (2011). 법률정보시스템 http:// likms.assembly.go.kr/law/jsp/law/Main.jsp

11.

이영복, 이상민, 이자영 (2009), 한국형 학업소진 척도 개발 및 타당화, 한국교육학연구, 15(3), 59-78.

12.

이주화, 김아영 (2005). 학업적 성취목표지향성 척도개발. 교육심리연구. 19(1), 311-325.

13.

조승우․김아영 (1998). 초등학교 아동의 목표지향성과 자기조절학습전략 및 자기효능감과의 관계. 교육과학연구, 27, 71-88.

14.

조준한 (2010). 청소년의 지적 능력에 대한 신념과 학교의 목표 및 사회적 지지가 성취목표지향성에 미치는 영향. 연세대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

15.

한순미 (2003). 중다목표관점에서의 성취목표와 자기조절 학습전략 사용간의 관계. 교육심리연구, 17(3), 291-312.

16.

홍승표 (2010). 영재․잠재영재․일반학생의 학교 소진 경험 및 주관적 안녕에 관한 연구. 영재와 영재교육, 9(1), 75-96.

17.

Bandura, A. L. (1986). Social foundations of though and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

18.

Barron, K. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 706.722.

19.

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.

20.

Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.

21.

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.

22.

Elliot A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: a mediation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.

23.

Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2*2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.

24.

Hair. J. F., & Black, W. C. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. G. Grim & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics, 147-205. Washington, DC: Psychological Association.

25.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.

26.

Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.

27.

Midgley, C., Maehr, M., Hruda, L. et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. University of Michigan

28.

Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In. R. Cairns, L. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual: Essays in honor of Marian Radke-Yarrow (pp.33-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.

30.

Pastor, D. A., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students' achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8-47.

31.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.

32.

Salmela-Aro, K., Tolvanen, A., & Nurmi, J. (2009). Achievement strategies during university studies predict early career burnout and engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 162-172.

33.

Schaufeli, W. B., Martez, I. M., Marques Pinto, A., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 464-481.

34.

Tuominen-Soini, H., Salmela-Aro, K., & Niemivirta, M. (2008). Achievement goal orientations and subjective well-being: A person-centered analysis. Learning and Instruction, 18, 251-266.

Korean Journal of School Psychology