- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
논문 상세
Home > 논문 상세
사골농축액 시료 중에 함유된 아미노산 정량분석에 대한 오차 요인 및 측정불확도 추정
Error factors and uncertainty measurement for determinations of amino acid in beef bone extract
분석과학 / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2013, v.26 no.2, pp.125-134
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2013.26.2.125
(서울대학교)
(단국대학교)
(국립농업과학원)
(서울대학교)
(단국대학교)
(국립농업과학원)
(서울대학교)
김영준,
신영재,
김지영,
&
정민유.
(2013). 사골농축액 시료 중에 함유된 아미노산 정량분석에 대한 오차 요인 및 측정불확도 추정. 분석과학, 26(2), 125-134, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2013.26.2.125
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
본 연구는 액체크로마토그래피를 이용하여 사골농축액 시료 중에 23종의 아미노산 정량분석 시발생할 수 있는 측정불확도를 평가하였다. 아미노산 분석에 관여하는 측정불확도 인자로 시료량, 최종 무게, 표준품 무게, 표준품 순도, 검정곡선, 회수율 및 재현성 등을 확인하였다. GUM(Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement)과 EURACHEM에 근거하여 측정불확도에 대한 수학적 계산 및 통계분석을 수행하였다. 사골농축액 시료 중 총 아미노산 함량은 36.18 g/100 g이었으며, 95% 신뢰수준(k, 2.05~2.36) 에서 확장불확도는 3.81 g/100 g이었다. 측정불확도의 주요 요인은 분석시의 회수율과 반복성(25.2%) >시료전처리(24.5%) > 검정곡선(24.0%) 순으로 나타났다. 따라서 아미노산 분석 시 불확도를 줄이기 위해 서는 실험자들의 주의와 개인적인 숙력도의 향상이 요구된다.
- keywords
- uncertainty, measurement, amino acid
Abstract
This study was demonstrated to estimate the measurement uncertainty of 23 multiple-component amino acids from beef bone extract by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The sources of measurement uncertainty (i.e. sample weight, final volume, standard weight, purity, standard solution, calibration curve, recovery and repeatability) in associated with the analysis of amino acids were evaluated. The estimation of uncertainty obtained on the GUM (Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement) and EURACHEM document with mathematical calculation and statistical analysis. The content of total amino acids from beef bone extract was 36.18 g/100 g and the expanded uncertainty by multiplying coverage factor (k, 2.05~2.36)was 3.81 g/100 g at a 95% confidence level. The major contributors to the measurement uncertainty were identified in the order of recovery and repeatability (25.2%), sample pretreatment (24.5%), calibration-curve (24.0%) and weight of the reference material (10.4%). Therefore, more careful experiments are required in these steps to reduce uncertainties of amino acids analysis with a better personal proficiency improvement.
- keywords
- uncertainty, measurement, amino acid
참고문헌
1
F. Toldrá, M. C. Aristoy, C. Part, C. Crerveró, E. Rico, M. J. Motilva and J. Flores, J. Food Sci., 57, 816-818 (1992).
2
J. Ventanas, J. J. Cordoba, T. Antequera, C. Garcia, C. Lopez-Bote and A. Asensio, J. Food Sci., 57, 813-815 (1992).
3
M. A. Dura, M. Flores and F. Toldra, Food Chem., 86, 385-389 (2004).
4
J. A. White, R. J. Hart and J. C. Fry, J. Automatic Chem., 8, 170-177(1988).
5
Y. J. Kim and H. W. Kim, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 35, 1053-1059 (2003).
6
Ellison, S. L. R., Roesslein, M. I., and Williams, ‘A. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements 2nd’, EURACHEM, London, UK, 32-94. 2000.
7
ISO, “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurements. International Organization for Standardization (GUM), Swizerland”. 1995.
8
B. N. Taylor and C. E. Kuyatt, ‘Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, National Institute of standards and technology (NIST)’, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (1994).
9
E. Hund, D. L. Massart and J. Smeyers-Verbeke, Anal. Chim. Acta., 480, 39-52 (2003).
10
L. Alder, W. Korth, A. L. Patey, H. A. Schee and S. Schoeneweiss, J. AOAC. Int., 84, 1569-1578 (2001).
11
M. D. Islam, M. S. Turcu and A. Cannavan, Food Addit Contam., 25, 1439-1450 (2008).
12
H. E. Ok, H. J. Chang, Y, W. Kang, M. H. Kim and H. S. Chun, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 26, 142-149 (2011).
13
S. C. Heo, J. S. Min, J. S. Park, M. A. Lim and S. W. Park, Analytical Science & Technology., 17, 443-453 (2004).
14
M. K. Kim, S. J. Park, C. M. Lim, B. H. Cho, H. J. Kwon, D. G. Kim and G. S. Chung, Korean J. Vet Res., 47, 139-145 (2007).
15
H. M. Lee, B. M. Kwak, J. H. Ahn and T. H. Jeon, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 40, 152-159 (2008).
16
J. Y. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. H. Yoo, J. H. Lee, M. J. Kim, D. W. Kang, G. J. Im, M. K. Hong, Y. J. Shin and W. I. Kim, Korean J. Environ Agric., 30, 179-188 (2011).
17
U. Schepers, J. Ermer, L. Preu and H. Watzig, J. Chromatogr. B., 810. 111-118 (2004).
18
D. B. Hibbert, J. Jiang and M. I. Mulholland, Anal. Chim. Acta., 443, 205-214 (2001).
19
E. Soboleva, A. Ambrus and O Jarju, J. Chromatogr. A., 1029, 161-166 (2004).
20
R. L. Heinrikson and S. C. Meridith, Anal. Biochem, 136, 65-74 (1984).
21
C. R Llames and J. Fontaine, J. AOAC Int., 77, 1362- 1402 (1994).
22
KOLAS, “Guideline for quantifying and expressing the uncertainty in measurement results. Korea Laboratory Accreditation Scheme. Daejon, Korea”, 2000.
23
FDA. Guidance for industry Bioanalytical Method Validation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Rockville, MD, USA. 2001.
24
J. Y. Jun, B. M. Kwak, J. H. Ahn and U. Y. Kong, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 36, 701-710 (2004).
25
S. Leito, K. Mölder, A. Künnapas, K. Herodes and I. Leito , J. Chromatogr. A., 1121, 55-63 (2006).
26
H. E. Ok, H. J. Chang, J. H. Ahn, J. Y. Cho and H. S. Chun, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 41, 258-264 (2009).
권호 내 다른 논문
추천 논문
학술지 홈페이지 이용 환경은 크롬 브라우저 사용을 권장합니다.