- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Error factors and uncertainty measurement for determinations of amino acid in beef bone extract
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2013, v.26 no.2, pp.125-134
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2013.26.2.125
&
(2013). Error factors and uncertainty measurement for determinations of amino acid in beef bone extract. Analytical Science and Technology, 26(2), 125-134, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2013.26.2.125
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
This study was demonstrated to estimate the measurement uncertainty of 23 multiple-component amino acids from beef bone extract by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The sources of measurement uncertainty (i.e. sample weight, final volume, standard weight, purity, standard solution, calibration curve, recovery and repeatability) in associated with the analysis of amino acids were evaluated. The estimation of uncertainty obtained on the GUM (Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement) and EURACHEM document with mathematical calculation and statistical analysis. The content of total amino acids from beef bone extract was 36.18 g/100 g and the expanded uncertainty by multiplying coverage factor (k, 2.05~2.36)was 3.81 g/100 g at a 95% confidence level. The major contributors to the measurement uncertainty were identified in the order of recovery and repeatability (25.2%), sample pretreatment (24.5%), calibration-curve (24.0%) and weight of the reference material (10.4%). Therefore, more careful experiments are required in these steps to reduce uncertainties of amino acids analysis with a better personal proficiency improvement.
- keywords
- uncertainty, measurement, amino acid
Reference
1
F. Toldrá, M. C. Aristoy, C. Part, C. Crerveró, E. Rico, M. J. Motilva and J. Flores, J. Food Sci., 57, 816-818 (1992).
2
J. Ventanas, J. J. Cordoba, T. Antequera, C. Garcia, C. Lopez-Bote and A. Asensio, J. Food Sci., 57, 813-815 (1992).
3
M. A. Dura, M. Flores and F. Toldra, Food Chem., 86, 385-389 (2004).
4
J. A. White, R. J. Hart and J. C. Fry, J. Automatic Chem., 8, 170-177(1988).
5
Y. J. Kim and H. W. Kim, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 35, 1053-1059 (2003).
6
Ellison, S. L. R., Roesslein, M. I., and Williams, ‘A. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements 2nd’, EURACHEM, London, UK, 32-94. 2000.
7
ISO, “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurements. International Organization for Standardization (GUM), Swizerland”. 1995.
8
B. N. Taylor and C. E. Kuyatt, ‘Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, National Institute of standards and technology (NIST)’, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (1994).
9
E. Hund, D. L. Massart and J. Smeyers-Verbeke, Anal. Chim. Acta., 480, 39-52 (2003).
10
L. Alder, W. Korth, A. L. Patey, H. A. Schee and S. Schoeneweiss, J. AOAC. Int., 84, 1569-1578 (2001).
11
M. D. Islam, M. S. Turcu and A. Cannavan, Food Addit Contam., 25, 1439-1450 (2008).
12
H. E. Ok, H. J. Chang, Y, W. Kang, M. H. Kim and H. S. Chun, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 26, 142-149 (2011).
13
S. C. Heo, J. S. Min, J. S. Park, M. A. Lim and S. W. Park, Analytical Science & Technology., 17, 443-453 (2004).
14
M. K. Kim, S. J. Park, C. M. Lim, B. H. Cho, H. J. Kwon, D. G. Kim and G. S. Chung, Korean J. Vet Res., 47, 139-145 (2007).
15
H. M. Lee, B. M. Kwak, J. H. Ahn and T. H. Jeon, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 40, 152-159 (2008).
16
J. Y. Kim, Y. J. Kim, J. H. Yoo, J. H. Lee, M. J. Kim, D. W. Kang, G. J. Im, M. K. Hong, Y. J. Shin and W. I. Kim, Korean J. Environ Agric., 30, 179-188 (2011).
17
U. Schepers, J. Ermer, L. Preu and H. Watzig, J. Chromatogr. B., 810. 111-118 (2004).
18
D. B. Hibbert, J. Jiang and M. I. Mulholland, Anal. Chim. Acta., 443, 205-214 (2001).
19
E. Soboleva, A. Ambrus and O Jarju, J. Chromatogr. A., 1029, 161-166 (2004).
20
R. L. Heinrikson and S. C. Meridith, Anal. Biochem, 136, 65-74 (1984).
21
C. R Llames and J. Fontaine, J. AOAC Int., 77, 1362- 1402 (1994).
22
KOLAS, “Guideline for quantifying and expressing the uncertainty in measurement results. Korea Laboratory Accreditation Scheme. Daejon, Korea”, 2000.
23
FDA. Guidance for industry Bioanalytical Method Validation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Rockville, MD, USA. 2001.
24
J. Y. Jun, B. M. Kwak, J. H. Ahn and U. Y. Kong, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 36, 701-710 (2004).
25
S. Leito, K. Mölder, A. Künnapas, K. Herodes and I. Leito , J. Chromatogr. A., 1121, 55-63 (2006).
26
H. E. Ok, H. J. Chang, J. H. Ahn, J. Y. Cho and H. S. Chun, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 41, 258-264 (2009).
Other articles from this issue
- Contents characteristics of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in indoor household dust
- The quantitative analysis of combustive gases on fire by remote passive open path FT-IR spectrometer
- Error factors and uncertainty measurement for determinations of amino acid in beef bone extract
- Determination of selenium in grains by hydride generation-ICP/MS
- Development and validation of an analytical method for the determination of lepimectin residues by HPLC-PDA
- Development and validation of an analytical method for pyrimisulfan determination in agricultural commodities by LC-MS/MS
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.