바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

Nest Box Preference by Secondary Cavity-Nesting Birds in Forested Environments

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2007, v.30 no.1, pp.49-56








Abstract

We placed and monitored 2,137 nest boxes to determine how the size of the entrance hole andthe box placement influenced nest box selection by secondary cavity-nesting birds and to derive recommen-dations for the use of nest boxes for management of cavity-nesting birds in forested environments. A total of 566 pairs of seven bird species used the nest boxes from 1997 to 2006, 562 of which were secondary cavity-nesters. Sympatric tits such as varied tits (Parus varius), great tits (P. major), and marsh tits (P. palustris) were common breeding birds in nest boxes, and showed clear preferences for 4.0 cm, 3.5 cm and 3.0 cm nest holes, respectively. Tree sparrows (Passer montanus Sitta europaea) preferred 4 cm and 3.5 cm holes, respectively. We did not detect selection for the directional orientation for the entrance hole, but the birds appeared to avoid nest boxes that faced steep or gentle upward slopes and those less than 1.8 m from the ground. These results are probably related to avoidance of disturbance and predation. We suggest that diverse species can be supported by the placement of nest boxes with entrance holes of various sizes and that specific species can be targeted by selecting the hole sizes prefered by those species. To attract secondary cavity-nesters, managers should avoid placing nest boxes close to the ground and facing hills. This study also boxes.

keywords
Entrance hole, Forested environments, Nest boxes, Preference, Secondary cavity-nesting birdsChoi, Chang-Yong et al. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 30 (1) 50each species. We monitored the selection of nest boxes by secon-dary cavity-nesters in 2, 137 nest boxes, Entrance hole, Forested environments, Nest boxes, Preference, Secondary cavity-nesting birdsChoi, Chang-Yong et al. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 30 (1) 50each species. We monitored the selection of nest boxes by secon-dary cavity-nesters in 2, 137 nest boxes

Reference

1.

Moreno J, (1987) and use of foraging sites in tits,

2.

(1990) Orientation of American kestrel nest cavities revisited,

3.

(2005) Competition predation and nest niche shifts among tropical cavity nesters,

4.

(1987) Ecological studies on the inhabitation of artificial nests by wild birds:especially in Gyeongnam province, 109-118

5.

(1997) Nest Predation in Black capped Chickadees how safe are cavity nests,

6.

(1988) Feeding ecology of great tits breeding in suburban gardens,

7.

(1971) Species using red-cockaded woodpecker holes in northeastern South Carolina,

8.

(1979) Food and food consumption of nestling tits in the evergreen broad leaved forests in northern Kyushu,

9.

(2002) A comparison of the characteristics and fate of barrows goldeneye and buffalehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities,

10.

(1981) Non-random orientation of Gila Woodpecker nest entrances in saguaro cactus,

11.

(1974) Quantitative measurements of food selection,

12.

(1978) Needs of nest box settlement,

13.

(1967) Breeding biology and chick food of Korean great tit Res Rep For Res Inst 12,

14.

(2000) A comparative study on the breeding biology of great tit Parus major using nest box in the Younggwang and Gwangju areas,

15.

(1987) Studies on the attracting bird to forest ecology of coal tit Res Rep For Res Inst 35,

16.

(1984) Factors affecting nest site location in Gila Woodpeckers,

17.

(1996) Foods and nest boxes of wildbirds in natural and degraded ecosystem,

18.

(1991) Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages,

19.

(1986) Choice of nest boxes by tree swallows,

20.

(1996) Managing forestlands for wildlife Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats,

21.

(2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity nesting communities in interior British Columbia,

22.

(1993) Evolutionary determinants of clutch size in cavity nesting birds Nest predation or limited breeding opportunities? Am Nat 142,

23.

(2004) Nest cavity orientation in black capped chickadees Poecile atricapillus do the acoustic properties of cavities influence sound reception in the nest and extra pair matings ,

24.

(1994) Difference of nest box directions used by tit species and Tree Sparrows,

25.

(1996) Difference of nest box use in relation to the height by tit species and Tree Sparrows,

26.

(1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole- nesting birds:a review, 265-276

27.

(1984) The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds:The importance of nest predation and competition, 165-175

28.

(2005) Tree species preference and inter specific difference of foraging maneuver trees and location among four canopy-dwelling birds at high-elevation temperate deciduous forest in Mt,

29.

(2005) Temporal changes of foraging niches among breeding tits n a Korean temperate deciduous forest,

30.

(1997) A comparison of the breeding ecology of birds nesting in boxes and tree cavities,

31.

(1985) Orientation of American Kestrel nest cavities and nest trees,

32.

(1990) Influence of forest edge on nest-site selection by tree swallows,

33.

(1993) clutch-size and the breeding ecology of Tree Swallows Tachycineta bycolor,

34.

(1994) Cavity-entrance orientation and nest- site use by secondary hole-nesting birds,

35.

(1990) A comparison of the breeding ecology of a secondary cavity nesting bird,

36.

(1982) Nest-site selection by cavity-nesting birds of riparian habitats in Iowa,

37.

(2001) Clutch size relative to tree cavity size in Northern Flickers,

38.

(1981) Illustrated flora and fauna of Korea Ministry of Education,

39.

(1965) Breeding biology and chick food of varied tit Parus varius in Korea,

40.

(1985) Studies on the attracting bird to forest ecology of Korean great tit Res Rep For Res Inst 32,

41.

(2007) Received January 11, 2007; Accepted February 15, 2007,

Journal of Ecology and Environment