바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.1

Citation Share

An Evaluation of the Effects of Rehabilitation Practiced in Coal Mining Spoils in Korea: 2. An Evaluation Based on the Physicochemical Properties of Soil

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2008, v.31 no.1, pp.23-29
Lee, Chang-Seok* (Seoul Women's University)
Yong-Chan Cho (Seoul Women's University)
Hyun-Chul Shin (Seoul Women's University)
Seon-Mi Lee (Seoul Women's University)
Woo-Seok Oh (Seoul Women's University)
Sung-Ae Park (Seoul Women's University)
Eun Sil Seol (Seoul Women's University)
Choong-Hwa Lee (Korea Forestry Research Institute)
Ahn-Heum Eom (Korea University of Education)

Lee,, C. , Yong-Chan, C. , Hyun-Chul, S. , Seon-Mi, L. , Woo-Seok, O. , Sung-Ae, P. , Eun, S. S. , Choong-Hwa, L. , Ahn-Heum, E. , & (2008). An Evaluation of the Effects of Rehabilitation Practiced in Coal Mining Spoils in Korea: 2. An Evaluation Based on the Physicochemical Properties of Soil. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 31(1), 23-29.

Abstract

The effectiveness of rehabilitation programs for coal mining spoils in Samcheok, Jeongsun, and Mungyung were evaluated based on the physicochemical properties of soil in the rehabilitated areas. These spoils were reclaimed by introducing plants such as black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), pitch pine (Pinus rigida), birch (Betula platyphylla var. japonica), alder (Alnus hirsuta), bush clover (Lespedeza cyrtobotrya), and grass (Lolium perenne) in planting beds covered with forest soil. In the surface soil, the pH, organic matter, total N, available P, and exchangeable Ca showed significant changes over the years after reclamation. The pH and exchangeable Ca content decreased exponentially over time, whereas organic matter increased linearly and total N and available P increased exponentially. Changes in the physicochemical properties of subsurface soils displayed a different pattern. There were significant changes over time in the organic matter, available P, and exchangeable Ca and Mg contents of the soil. Organic matter increased logarithmically with years since rehabilitation and available P increased exponentially. Meanwhile, exchangeable Ca decreased exponentially, and Mg decreased logarithmically. The changes in the subsurface soil were not as dramatic as those in the surface soil. This result suggests that the ameliorating effects of the establishment and growth of plants more pronounced on the surface soil layer. Stand ordination data showed different relationships with time since rehabilitation in the early and later stages of the rehabilitation process. In the early stages of rehabilitation, stands tended to be arranged in the order of reclamation age. However, in the later stages, there was not a clear relationship between reclamation age and vegetation characteristics. This result suggests that soil amelioration is required for the early stages, after which an autogenic effect becomes more prominent as the vegetation becomes better established.

keywords
Autogenic effect, Coal mining spoils, Physicochemical properties, Rehabilitation, Soil

Reference

1.

Aronson J, Floret C, Le floc’h E, Ovalle C, Pontainer P. 1993. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands. A review from the South. Restor Ecol 1: 8-17.

2.

Bishel-Machung L, Brooks RP, Yates SS, Hoover KL. 1996. Soil properties of reference wetlands and wetland creation projects in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 16: 532-541.

3.

Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundze der Begetaionskunde. Springer-Verlag, Wein.

4.

Choi YD. 2004. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: Toward 'futuristic' restoration. Ecol Res 19: 75-81.

5.

Choi YD, Pavlovic NB. 1998. Experimental restoration of native vegetation in Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Restor Ecol 6: 118-129.

6.

Choi YD, Wali MK. 1995. The role of Panicum virgatum (switch grass) in the revegetation of iron-mine tailings in northern New York. Restor Ecol 3: 123-132.

7.

Connell JH, Slatyer RO. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111: 1119-1124.

8.

Dobson AP, Bradshaw AD, Baker, AJM 1997. Hopes for the future.: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277: 515-522.

9.

Ewel JJ. 1987. Restoration is the ultimate test of ecological theory. In: Restoration Ecology, a Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research (Jordan WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD, eds). Cambridge Press, Cambridge,pp 31-33.

10.

Hill MO. 1979. DECORANA -A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging-. Cornell University Ithaca, New York.

11.

Hobbs RJ, Norton DA. 1996. Toward a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4: 93-110.

12.

Jackson LL, Lopoukhine N, Hillyard, D. 1995. Ecological restoration: a definition and comments. Restor Ecol 3: 71-75.

13.

Jeong JH, Koo KS, Lee CH, Kim CS. 2002. Physicochemical properties of Korean forest soils by regions. Jour Korean For Soc 91(6): 694-700.

14.

Lee CS, Cho YC, Shin HC, Lee SM, Lee CH, Eom AH. 2007a. An evaluation of the Effects of Rehabilitation Practiced in the Coal Mining Spoils in Korea 1. An Evaluation Based on Vegetation. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 55-60.

15.

Lee CS, Cho YC, Oh WS. 2007b. Selection of tolerant plant species and artificial facilitation for ecological restoration of the abandoned coal mines. Proceedings for 92nd ESA-16th SERI joint meeting held in Sanjose, California USA on Aug. 6 to 10, 2007. 458p.

16.

Odum EP. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262-270.

17.

SERI (Society for Ecological Restoration International Science) 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International.

18.

Strykstra RJ, Bekker RM, Bakker JP. 1998. Assessment of dispersal availability: Its practical use in restoration management. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 47: 57-70.

19.

van Andel J, Baker JP, Grootjans, AP. 1993. Mechanisms of vegetation succession: A review of concepts and perspectives. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 42: 413-433.

20.

Walker LR, del Moral R. 2004. Primary succession and ecosystem rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

21.

Walker LR, Walker J, del Moral R. 2007. Foraging a new alliance between succession and restoration. In: Linking Restoration and Ecological Succession (Walker LR, Walker J, Hobbs RJ, eds).Springer, New York, pp 1-18.

22.

Wright RA, Muller-Dombois D. 1988. Relationships among shrub po-pulation structure, species associations, seedling root form and early volcanic succession, Hawaii. In: Plant form and vegetation struc-ture (Werger MJA, van der Aart PJM, During HJ, and Ver-hoeven JTA eds). SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 87-104.

23.

Zedler JB, Callaway JC. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation site follow desired trajectories? Restor Ecol 7:69-73.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy