- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2287-8327
- E-ISSN2288-1220
- SCOPUS, KCI
ISSN : 2287-8327
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.48)
- 2023 (Vol.47)
- 2022 (Vol.46)
- 2021 (Vol.45)
- 2020 (Vol.44)
- 2019 (Vol.43)
- 2018 (Vol.42)
- 2017 (Vol.41)
- 2016 (Vol.39)
- 2015 (Vol.38)
- 2014 (Vol.37)
- 2013 (Vol.36)
- 2012 (Vol.35)
- 2011 (Vol.34)
- 2010 (Vol.33)
- 2009 (Vol.32)
- 2008 (Vol.31)
- 2007 (Vol.30)
- 2006 (Vol.29)
- 2005 (Vol.28)
- 2004 (Vol.27)
- 2003 (Vol.26)
- 2002 (Vol.25)
- 2001 (Vol.24)
Relationship between the Time and Duration of Flowering in Several Woody Plants in Springtime
Ji Sook Lee (Dankook University)
Sang Jin Jeong (Dankook University)
Abstract
To clarify the relationship between the timing and the duration of flowering among populations, plants, and individual flowers, the dates of flower budding, flowering and deflowering were monitored for ten woody species from March 1 to June 30, in 2005, 2006 and 2007, in temperate deciduous forests at three sites of Namsan, and individual plants from seven woody species were monitored from March 1 to May 31, in 2006. Total durations of flower budding, flowering, and deflowering varied among the plant species. Three durations of these phenological stages of Stephanandra incisa were the longest (74 days, 109 days, and 101 days, respectively), and those of Prunus serrulata var. spontanea were the shortest (7 days, 7 days, and 4 days, respectively). For each species, phenological durations varied among years but were similar among the study sites in the same year. There was no relationship between flowering time and flowering duration on the population level. On the plant level, the duration of flower budding was over 11 days in all specie; S. incisa had the longest duration (73.3 days), and that of Styrax japonica was long as well (29.0 days), while that of Prunus leveilleana was the shortest (11.3 days). The longer the mean flower budding duration, the greater the difference among the plants within a species. The flowering duration of for S. incisa was 92.2 days, while that of Forsythia koreana was 27.2 days. The flowering durations of all other species were 10～20 days. The deflowering duration was 92.0 days in S. incisa and <15 days in all other species. Differences among the plants in deflowering duration were smaller than those of the other phenological stages. In the species that flowered in April, the correlation coefficient between the flowering duration and the first flowering date was negative and significant. However, in the species that flowered in May, the correlation between flowering duration and the first flowering date was not significant. For individual plants of all species except for S. alnifolia, the earlier the flowering time, the longer the flowering duration. Differences between flowering time and flowering duration across years were significant in six species.
- keywords
- Deflowering, Flower budding, Flowering, Phenology, Springtime, Woody plants
Reference
Arianoutsou M, Mardiris TA. 1985. Observations on the phenology of two dominant plants of the Greek maquis. In: Plant response to stress, (Tenhunen JD, Catarino FM, Lange OL, Oecheol WC, eds). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 515-519.
Augspurger CK. 1981. Reproductive synchrony of a tropical shrub; Experimental studies on effects of pollinators and seed predators on Hybanthus prunifolius (Violaceae). Ecology 62: 775-778.
Bishop JG, Schemske DW. 1998. Variation in flowering phenology and its consequences for lupines colonizing Mount St. Helens. Ecology 79: 534-546.
Brondy AK. 1997. Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology 78: 1624-1631.
Buide ML, Díaz-Peromingo JA, Guitián J. 2002. Flowering phenology and female reproductive success in Silene acutifolia Link ex Rohrb. Plant Ecol 163: 93-103.
Diekmann M. 1996. Relationship between flowering phenology of perennial herbs and meteorological data in deciduous forests of Sweden. Can J Bot 74: 528-537.
Flint HL. 1974. Phenology and genecology of woody plants. In: Phenology and seasonality modeling, (Lieth H, ed). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 83-97.
Galen C, Stanton ML. 1991. Consequences of emergence phenology for reproductive success in Ranunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae). Amer Bot 78: 978-988.
Garner WW, Allard HA. 1920. Effect of the relative length of the day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plant. J Agri Res 18: 553-606.
Gross RS, Werner PA. 1983. Relationships among flowering phenology, insect visitors, and seed-set of individuals: Experimental studies on four co-occurring species of goldenrod (Solidago: Compositae). Ecol Monogr 53: 95-117.
Kelly MG, Levin DA. 2000. Directional selection on initial flowering date in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae). Amer J Bot 87: 382-391.
Kozlowski J. 1992. Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: implications for age and size at maturity. Trends in Ecol Evol 7: 15-18.
Kudo G. 1992. Pre-flowering and fruiting periods of alpine plants inhabiting a snow-bed. J Phytogeogr Taxon 40: 99-106.
Kudo G, Suzuki S. 1999. Flowering phenology of alpine plant communities along a gradient of snowmelt timing. Polar Biosci 12: 100-113.
Lieth H. 1974. Phenology and seasonality modeling. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Marquis RJ. 1988. Phenological variation in the neotropical understory shrub Piper arieianum: Causes and consequences. Ecology 69:1552-1565.
Min BM, Yi DH, Jeong SJ. 2007. Relationship between phenological stages and cumulative air temperature in spring time at Namsan. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 143-149.
O'Neil P. 1997. Natural selection on genetically correlated phenological characteristics in Lythrum salicaria L. (Lythraceae). Evolution 51:267-274.
Petterson MW. 1991. Flower herbivory and seed predation in Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of pollination and phenology. Holaretic Ecol 14: 45-50.
Primack RB. 1987. Relationships among flowers, fruits, and seeds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 18: 409-430.
Ratchke B, Lacey EP. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16: 179-214.
Sakai S, Momose K, Yumoto T, Nagamitsu T, Nagamasy H, Hamid AA, Nakashizuka T. 1999. Plant reproductive phenology over four years including an episode of general flowering in a lowland dipterocarp forest, Sarawak, Malaysia. Amer J Bot 86: 141-1436.
Schemske DW. 1977. Flowering phenology and seed set in Claytonia virginica (Portulacaceae). Bull Torrey Bot Club 104: 253-263.
Schemske DW. 1984. Population structure and local selection in Impatiens pallida (Balsaminaceae), a selfing annual. Evolution 38: 817-832.
Schmitt J. 1983. Individual flowering phenology, plant size, and reproductive success in Linanthus androsaceus, a California annual. Oecologia (Berlin) 59: 135-149.
Shitaka Y, Hirose T. 1998. Effects of shift in flowering time on the reproductive output of Xanthium canadense in a seasonal environment. Oecologia 114: 361-367.
Thórhallsóttir TE. 1998. Flowering phenology in the central highland of Iceland and implications for climatic warming in the Arctic. Oecologia 114: 43-49.
Totland Ø, Alatalo JM. 2002. Effects of temperature and date of snowmelt on growth, reproduction, and flowering phenology in the arctic/alpine herb, Ranunculus glacialis. Oecologia 133: 168-175.
Walker MD, Ingersoll RC, Webber PJ. 1995. Effects for interannual climate variation on phenology and growth of two alpine forbs. Ecology 76: 1067-1083.
Wright JW, Meagher T. 2003. Pollination and seed predation drive flowering phenology in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Ecology 84: 2062-2073.
Yim YJ. 1986. The effects of thermal climate on the flowering dates of plants in South Korea. Kor J Apiculture 1: 67-84.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations