바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

Distribution of Organic Carbon in Pitch Pine Plantation in Kongju, Korea

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2009, v.32 no.1, pp.27-31


Abstract

Organic carbon (OC) distribution in 32-year-old pitch pine plantation at Mt. Hotae in Kongju, Korea, was studied from August 2007 to July 2008. In order to investigate the OC distribution, OC in plant biomass, litterfall, litter layer on forest floor, and soil within 50cm depth were estimated. The density of P. rigida plantation was 3,200 trees/ha, average DBH was 18.7 ± 5.53 cm and average tree height was 11.1 ± 1.85 m. Organic carbon stored in plant biomass, litterlayer on forest floor and soil in 2008 was 89.46 ton C/ha (46.09%), 4.32 ton C/ha (2.23%) and 100.32 ton C ha-1 50cm-depth-1 (51.68%), respectively. Amount of OC returned to forest floor via litterfall was 2.21 ton C ha-1 yr-1. Total amount of OC stored in this P. rigida plantation was 194.1 ton C/ha. Net increase of OC in above- and below-ground biomass in this pitch pine plantation was 4.82 ton C ha-1 yr-1.

keywords
Carbon distribution, Litterfall, Organic carbon (OC), Pinus rigida plantation, Soil organic carbon (SOC)

Reference

1.

Amichev BY, Burger JA, Rodrigue JA. 2008. Carbon sequestration by forests and soils on mined land in the Midwestern and Appalachian coalfields of the U.S. For Ecol Manag 256: 1949-1959.

2.

Boyland M. 2006. The economics of using forests to increase carbon storage. Can J For Res 36: 2223-2234.

3.

Choi HJ, Jeon IY, Shin CH, Mun HT. 2006. Soil properties of Quercus variabilis forest on Youngha valley in Mt. Worak National Park. J Ecol Field Biol 29: 439-443.

4.

Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J. 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263: 185-190.

5.

Gucinski H, Vance E, Reiners WA. 1995. Potential effects of global climate change. In Ecophysiology of Coniferous Forests (Smith WK, Hinckley TM, eds). Academic Press, New York, pp 309- 331.

6.

Heath LS, Smith JE, Birdsey RA. 2003. Carbon trends in U.S. forestlands: a context for the role of soils in forest carbon sequestration. In The potential of U.S. Forest Soils to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect (Kimble JM, Heath LS, Birdsey RA, Lai R, eds). CRC Press, New York, pp 35-45.

7.

Houghton RA, Hobbie JE, Melillo JM, Moore B, Peterson BJ, Shaver GR, Woodwell GM. 1983. Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere. Ecol Monogr 53:235-262.

8.

Huntington TG. 1995. Carbon sequestration in an aggrading forest ecosystem in the southeastern USA. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59: 1459-1467.

9.

Huntington TG, Johnson CE, Johnson AH, Siccama TG, Ryan DF. 1989. Carbon, organic matter, and bulk density relationships in a forested spodosol. Soil Sci 148: 380-386.

10.

Jeon IY, Shin CH, Kim GH, Mun HT. 2007. Organic carbon distribution of the Pinus densiflora forest on Songgye valley at Mt. Worak National Park. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 17-21.

11.

Jeong JH, Kim C, Lee WK. 1998. Soil organic carbon content in forest soils of Korean. J For Sci 57: 178-183.

12.

Johnson FL, Risser PG. 1974. Biomass, annual net primary production and dynamics of six mineral elements in a post oak- blackjack oak forest. Ecology 55: 1246-1258.

13.

Kim C, Cho HS. 2004. Quantitative comparisons of soil carbon and nutrient storage in Larix leptolepis, Pinus densiflora and Pinus rigitaeda plantations. Korean J Ecol 27: 67-71.

14.

Kim C. 2006. Soil carbon cycling and soil CO2 efflux in a red pine (Pinus densiflora) stand. J Ecol Field Biol 29: 23-27.

15.

Kim JH. 1971. Studies on the productivity and the production structure of the forests. I. On the productivity of Pinus rigida plantation. Korean J Bot 14: 155-162.

16.

Kimble JM, Birdsey RA, Lal R, Heath LS. 2003 a. Introduction and general description of U.S. forests. In The Potential of U.S. Forest Soils to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect (Kimble JM, Heath LS, Birdsey RA, Lai R, eds). CRC Press, New York, pp 3-14.

17.

Kimble JM, Heath LS, Birdsey RA, Lal R. 2003b. The potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect. CRC Press, New York.

18.

Korea Forest Service. 2007. Forestry statistics at a glance. Korea Forest Service.

19.

Laclau P. 2003. Biomass and carbon sequestration of ponderosa pine plantations and native cypress forests in northwest Patagonia. For Ecol Manag 180: 317-333.

20.

Lee KJ. 2004. A study on the organic carbon distribution in forest ecosystems. MS Thesis. Kongju National University, Kongju.

21.

Lee KJ, Mun HT. 2005. Organic carbon distribution in an oak forest. Korean J Ecol 28: 265-270.

22.

Morris SJ, Paul EA. 2003. Forest soil ecology and organic carbon. In The Potential of U.S. Forest Soils to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect (Kimble JM, Heath LS, Birdsey RA, Lai R, eds). CRC Press, New York, pp 109-125.

23.

Morrison IK, Foster NW, Hazlett PW. 1993. Carbon reserves, carbon cycling, and harvesting effects in three mature forest types in Canada. NZ J For Sci 23: 403-412.

24.

Mun HT, Kim SJ, Shin CH. 2007. Litter production and nutrient contents of litterfall in oak and pine forests at Mt. Worak National Park. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 63-68.

25.

Namgung J, Choi HJ, Han AR, Mun HT. 2008. Organic carbon distribution and budget in the Quercus variabilis forest in the Youngha valley of Worak National Park. Korean J Environ Biol 26: 170-176.

26.

Roxburgh SH, Wood SW, Mackey BG, Woldendorp G, Gibbons P. 2006. Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of managed forests: a case study from temperate Australia. J Appl Ecol 43: 1149-1159.

27.

Schlesinger WH. 1997. Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. Academic Press, San Diego, California.

28.

Schwendenmann L, Pendall E. 2008. Response of soil organic matter dynamics to conversion from tropical forest to grassland as determined by long-term incubation. Biol Fertil Soils 44: 1053-1062.

29.

Tans PP, Fung IY, Takahashi T. 1990. Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget. Science 247: 1431-1438.

30.

Wright JA, DiNicola A, Gaitan E. 2000. Latin American forest plantations: opportunities for carbon sequestration, economic development, and financial returns. J Forestry 98: 20-23.

Journal of Ecology and Environment