- Apply for Authority
- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2287-8327
- E-ISSN2288-1220
- SCOPUS, KCI
ISSN : 2287-8327
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.48)
- 2023 (Vol.47)
- 2022 (Vol.46)
- 2021 (Vol.45)
- 2020 (Vol.44)
- 2019 (Vol.43)
- 2018 (Vol.42)
- 2017 (Vol.41)
- 2016 (Vol.39)
- 2015 (Vol.38)
- 2014 (Vol.37)
- 2013 (Vol.36)
- 2012 (Vol.35)
- 2011 (Vol.34)
- 2010 (Vol.33)
- 2009 (Vol.32)
- 2008 (Vol.31)
- 2007 (Vol.30)
- 2006 (Vol.29)
- 2005 (Vol.28)
- 2004 (Vol.27)
- 2003 (Vol.26)
- 2002 (Vol.25)
- 2001 (Vol.24)
Differences between Sand and Gravel Bars of Streams in Patterns of Vegetation Succession
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
We analyzed the factors driving succession and the structure, and dynamics of vegetation on sand and gravel bars in order to clarify the differences in vegetation succession in rivers with different river bed substrates. Woody plant communities (dominated by Salix), perennial herb communities (dominated by Miscanthus), and annual plant communities (dominated by Persicaria) appeared in that order from upstream to downstream on the sandbar. The results of DCA ordination based on vegetation data reflected a successional trend. This result suggests that sandbars grow in a downstream direction. Various vegetation types different in successional stage, such as grassland, young stands of Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora), two-layered stands of young and mature pines, and mature pine stands also occurred on gravel bars, but the vegetation in earlier successional stage was established upstream, which is the opposite to the direction found on sandbars. Those results demonstrate that the dynamics of the bed load itself could be a factor affecting vegetation succession in rivers. In fact, sands suspended by running water were transported downstream over the vegetated area of sand bar and thereby created new areas of sandbar on the downstream end of the sandbar. Meanwhile, gravel, which is heavy and thereby is shifted by strong water currents, accumulated on the upstream end of the vegetated area, and thus created new areas of gravel bar in that direction. These results showed that allogenic processes drive vegetation succession on sand and gravel bars in streams and rivers.
- keywords
- Allogenic process, Gravel bar, Sand bar, Succession, Vegetation
Reference
Barbour MG, Burk JH, Pitts WD, Gilliam FS, Schwartz MW. 1999. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. 3rd ed. The Benjamin/Cummings Co., Menlo Park.
Bliss LC, Cantlon JE. 1957. Succession on river alluvium in northern Alaska. Am Midl Nat 58: 452-469.
Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundze der Vegetaionskunde. Springer-Verlag, Vienna, Austria.
Choi SU, Yoon B, Woo H. 2005. Effects of dam-induced flow regime change downstream river morphology and vegetation cover in the Hwang River, Korea. River Res Applic 21: 315-325.
Choi SU, Yoon B, Woo H, Cho KH. 2004. Effect of flow-regime change due to damming on the river morphology and vegetation cover in the downstream river reach: a case of Hapcheon dam on the Hwang River. Korea Water Resource Ass 37: 55-66.
Chun YM, Park SA, Lee CS. 2007. Structure and dynamics of Korean red pine stands established as riparian vegetation at the Tsang stream in Mt. Seorak National Park, eastern Korea. J Ecol Field Biol 30: 347-356.
Clements FE. 1916. Plant Succession: Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, No 242, Washington DC.
Décamps H. 1996. The renewal of floodplain forest along rivers: a landscape perspective. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 26: 35-59.
Fonda RW. 1974. Forest succession in relation to river terrace development in Olympic National Park, Washington. Ecology 55: 927-942.
Hill MO. 1979. DECORANA - A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell University Ithaca, New York.
Korea Forest Service. 2003. Korea Plant Names Index. http://www.koreaplants. go.kr: 9101/. Accessed 13 February 2009.
Kent M, Cocker P. 1992. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Lee CS, Hong SG, Cho HJ, Oh JM. 1999. Technique of Natural Environmen Restoration. Dong Hwa Technology Publishing, Seoul.
Lee TB. 1985. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul. (in Korean)
Magurran AE. 2003. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, New York
McCook LJ. 1994. Understanding ecological community succession: Causal models and theories, a review. Vegetation 110: 115-147.
Miles J. 1979. Vegetation Dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London.
Müeller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley, New York.
Pickett STA. 1980. Non-equilibrium coexistence of plants. Bull Torrey Bot Club 107: 238-248.
Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Technol J 27: 379-423, 623-656.
Tsujimoto T. 1998. Development of sand island with vegetation in fluvial fan river under degradation. In Proceedings of Water Resources Engineering '98, vol. 1, (Apt SR, ed). ASCE: Reston, VA, pp 574-579.
Tsujimoto T. 1999. Fluvial processes in streams with vegetation. J Hydraulic Res 37: 789-803.
van Andel J, Bakker JP, Grootjans AP. 1993. Mechanisms of vegetation succession: a review of concepts and perspectives. Acta Bot Neer 42: 413-433.
van der Maarel E, Sykes MT. 1993. Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. J Veg Sci 4: 179-188.
Walker LR, Chapin FS III. 1986. The role of life history processes in primary succession on an Alaskan floodplain. Ecology 67: 1243-1253.
Watt AS. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. J Ecol 35: 1-22.
Weaver JE. 1960. Flood plain vegetation of the central Missouri Valley and contacts of woodland with prairie. Ecol Monogr 30: 37-64.
White PS, Pickett STA. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (Pickett STA, White PS, eds). Academic Press, New York. pp 3-13.
Wistendahl WA. 1958. The floodplain of the Raritan River, New Jersey. Ecol Monogr 28: 129-153.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations