바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Carabid beetle species as a biological indicator for different habitat types of agricultural landscapes in Korea

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2012, v.35 no.1, pp.35-39



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In the current study, several carabid beetle species were proposed as potential biological indicators for different habitat types (levee, upland dike, hillock, and streamside) of agricultural landscapes focusing on agrobiont species. Synuchus arcuaticollis and Synuchus orbicollis were found in all habitat types, indicating that they are general species for all habitat types. Harpalus eous and Synuchus cycloderus are potential bioindicator species for the paddy levee and hillock habitats,respectively. Amara pseudosimplicidens, Anisodactylus punctatipennis, and Chlaenius ocreatus, which occurred widely,and Bembidion morawitzi, which occurred only in the streamside habitat, are potential bioindicators for the streamside habitat.

keywords
bioindicator, carabid beetle, habitat, rural landscape

Reference

1.

Blake S, Foster GN, Eyre MD, Luff ML. 1994. Effects of habitat type and grassland management practices on the body size distribution of carabid beetles. Pedobiologia 38: 502-512.

2.

Duelli P, Obrist MK. 1998. In search of the best correlates for local organismal biodiversity in cultivated areas. Biodivers Conserv 7: 297-309.

3.

Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67: 345-366.

4.

Fournier E, Loreau M. 2001. Respective roles of recent hedges and forest patch remnants in the maintenance of ground-beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity in an agricultural landscape. Landsc Ecol 16: 17-32.

5.

Jonsson BG, Jonsell M. 1999. Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests. Biodivers Conserv 8: 1417-1433.

6.

Jung MP, Kim ST, Kim H, Lee JH. 2008. Biodiversity and community structure of ground-dwelling spiders in four different field margin types of agricultural landscapes in Korea. Appl Soil Ecol 38: 185-195.

7.

Kang BH, Lee JH, Park JK. 2009. The study on the characteristics of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Community for conservation of biodiversity in agricultural landscape. Korean J Environ Ecol 23: 545-552.

8.

Kinnunen H, Tiainen J. 1999. Carabid distribution in a farmland mosaic: the effect of patch type and location. Ann Zool Fenn 36: 149-158.

9.

Kremen C. 1992. Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecol Appl 2: 203-217.

10.

Lambeets K, Hendrickx F, Vanacker S, Van Looy K, Maelfait JP, Bonte D. 2008. Assemblage structure and conservation value of spiders and carabid beetles from restored lowland river banks. Biodivers Conserv 17: 3133-3148.

11.

Lawton MD, Dales RE, White J. 1998. The influence of house characteristics in a Canadian community on microbiological contamination. Indoor Air 8: 2-11.

12.

Lee JH. 2003. GIS Modeling and Monitoring of Agricultural and Aquatic Ecosystem Using Biological Indicators at a Watershed Scale. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation, Daejeon.

13.

Lövei GL, Sunderland KD. 1996. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu Rev Entomol 41: 231-256.

14.

Niemelä J. 1997. Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv Biol 11: 601-610.

15.

Niemelä J. 1999. Ecology and urban planning. Biodivers Conserv 8: 119-131.

16.

Niemelä J. 2000. Biodiversity monitoring for decision-making. Ann Zool Fenn 37: 307-317.

17.

Niemelä J, Haila Y, Halme E, Pajunen T, Punttila P. 1992. Small-scale heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles in the southern Finnish taiga. J Biogeogr 19: 173-181.

18.

Niemelä J, Kotze DJ, Venn S, Penev L, Stoyanov I, Spence J, Hartley D, de Oca EM. 2002. Carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) across urban-rural gradients: an international comparison. Landsc Ecol 17: 387-401.

19.

Noss RF. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4: 355-364.

20.

Oliver I, Beattie AJ. 1996. Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecol Appl 6: 594-607.

21.

Pearson DL, Cassola F. 1992. World-wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies. Conserv Biol 6: 376-391.

22.

Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

23.

Pisces Conservation. 2004. Species Diversity and Richness III (Software Program). Pisces Conservation, New Milton.

24.

Prendergast JR, Quinn RM, Lawton JH, Eversham BC, Gibbons DW. 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365: 335-337.

25.

Rainio J, Niemelä J. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 12: 487-506.

26.

Samu F, Szinetar C. 2002. On the nature of agribiont spiders. J Arachnol 30: 389-402.

27.

Samways MJ. 2006. Insect extinctions and insect survival. Conserv Biol 20: 245-246.

28.

Weaver JC. 1995. Indicator species and scale of observation. Conserv Biol 9: 939-942.

29.

Wise DH. 1993. Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Journal of Ecology and Environment