바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.36 No.1
Citation Share

HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT STATE OF VEGETATION DEGRADATION USING GIS, A CASE STUDY: SADRA REGION, IRAN

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2013, v.36 no.1, pp.49-56
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.006
Masoud Masoudi (Shiraz University)
E. AMIRI (2Department of Environment in Fars Province)
Masoud, M. , & E., A. (2013). HAZARD ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT STATE OF VEGETATION DEGRADATION USING GIS, A CASE STUDY: SADRA REGION, IRAN. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 36(1), 49-56, https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2013.006
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The entire land of Southern Iran faces problems arising out of various types of land degradation of which vegetation degradation forms one of the major types. The present work introduces a model developed for assessing the current status of hazard of vegetation degradation using Geographic Information System (GIS). This kind of assessment differs from those assessments based on vulnerability or potential hazard assessments. The Sadra watershed which covers the upper reaches of Marharlu basin, Fars Province, has been chosen for a hazard assessment of this type of degradation. The different kinds of data for indicators of current status of vegetation degradation were gathered from collecting of field data and also records of the governmental offices of Iran. Taking into consideration three indicators of current status of vegetation degradation the model identifies areas with different hazard classes. By fixing the thresholds of severity classes of the three indicators including per cent of vegetation cover, biomass production and ratio of actual biomass to potential biomass production, a hazard map for each indicator was first prepared in GIS. The final hazard map of current status of vegetation degradation was prepared by intersecting three hazards in the GIS. Results show areas under severe hazard class have been found to be widespread (89 %) while areas under moderate and very severe hazard classes have been found less extensive in the Sadra watershed. The preparation of hazard maps based on the GIS analysis of these indicators will be helpful for prioritizing the areas to initiate remedial measures.

keywords
Vegetation Degradation, GIS, Indicator, Hazard map, current state

Reference

1.

Ahmadi H. 1995. Applied geomorphology. Tehran University Publication. 613p.

2.

Ahmadi H, Abbas Abadi MR, Onagh M and Ekhtessasi MR. 2001. Quantitative assessment of desertification in Aghqalla and Gomishan Plain for creation of a regional model. Iranian J. Natural Resources 54 (1): 3-22.

3.

Alaback PB. 1986. Biomass regression equations for understory plants in coastal Alaska: effects of species and sampling design on estimates. Northwest Science 60(2): 90–103.

4.

Asadu C LA, Ike OO and Ugwuoke BO. 1999. Cattle grazing and environment in eastern Nigeria: Impact on soil physical properties. Outlook on Agriculture 28: 103-107.

5.

Bonham CD. 1989. Measurements for terrestrial vegetation. John Wiley & sons, Inc:New York. 338 p.

6.

Bridges EM, Hannam ID, Oldeman LR, Penning de Vries FWT, Scherr SJ and Sombatpanit S .2001. Response to land degradation. Science publishers, INC, 510p.

7.

Chiarucci A, Wilson JB, Anderson BJ & De Dominicis V. 1999. Cover versus biomass as an estimate of species abundance: does it make a difference to the conclusions? Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 35–42

8.

EEA. 1999. Environment in the European Union at the turn of the century, environmental assessment report No.2. Copenhagen: EEA.

9.

FAO. 1994. Land degradation in South Asia: its severity causes and effects upon the people. FAO, UNDP and UNEP: Rome.

10.

FAO/UNEP. 1984. Provisional methodology for assessment and mapping of desertification. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 84p.

11.

Feiznia S, Gooya AN, Ahmadi H and Azarnivand H. 2001. Investigation on desertification factors in Hossein-Abad Mish Mast plain and a proposal for a regional model. Journal of Biaban 6: 1-14.

12.

Grunblatt J, Ottichilo WK and Sinange RK. 1992. A GIS approach to desertification assessment and mapping. Journal of Arid Environments 23: 81-102.

13.

Jonasson S. 1988. Evaluation of the point intercept method for the estimation of plant biomass. Oikos 52: 10–106.

14.

Kharin NG. 1986. Desertification assessment and mapping: a case study of Turkmenistan, USSR. Annals of Arid Zone 25: 1-17.

15.

Kumar S. 1992. Assessment of vegetation degradation: status of methodological research. Annals of Arid zone 31: 53- 62.

16.

Le Houerou, H. N. 1965. Improvement of natural pastures and fodder resources. Report to the Government of Libya. FAO, Rome. EPTA Rep. No. 1979. 46 p.

17.

Le Houerou HN and Le Hoste CH. 1977. Rangeland production and annual rainfall relations in the Mediteranianian Basin and in the African Sahelo- Sudanian zone. Jour. of Range Management 30: 181-189.

18.

Le Houerou HN. 1996. Climate change, drought and desertification. Journal of Arid Environments 34: 133-185.

19.

Liang E, Vennetier M, Lin J, Shao X. 2003. Relationships between tree increment, climate and above-ground biomass of grass: a case study in the typical steppe, north China. Acta Oecologica 24: 87–94.

20.

MacDonald R L, Burke JM, Chen HYH., and Prepas EE. 2012. Relationship between Aboveground Biomass and Percent Cover of Ground Vegetation in Canadian Boreal Plain Riparian Forests. Forest Science 58(1): 47-53.

21.

Masoudi M. 2005. Risk assessment of land degradation in parts of Mond Basin, Southern Iran [PhD thesis]. Department of Environmental Science, Pune University, India.

22.

Muukkonen P, Makipaa R, Laiho R, Minkkinen K, Vasander H. and Finer L. 2006. Relationship between biomass and percentage cover in understorey vegetation of boreal coniferous forests. Silva Fenn. 40:231–245.

23.

Mwendra E J and Mohammad Saleem MA. 1996. Infiltration rates surface runoff and soil loss as influenced by grazing pressure in the Ethiopian highlands. Soil Use and Management 13: 29-35.

24.

Oldeman LR, Hakkeling RTA and Sombroek WG. 1991. World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note. Wageningen, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Nairobi, UNEP, 27 p + 3 maps. Revised edition.

25.

Rtِtgermann M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W & Dietz H. 2000. Linear relationship between aboveground biomass and plant cover in low open herbaceous vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science 11(1):145–148.

26.

Van Lynden GWJ and Oldeman. 1997. Assessment of the status of human-induced soil degradation in south and southeast asia (ASSOD). International Soil Reference and Information Centre.

27.

Wijngaarden, W. van. 1985. Elephants-Trees-Grass-Grazers: relationships between climate, soil, vegetation and large herbivores in a semi-arid savanna ecosystem. ITC Publ. No. 4, Enschede, Netherlands.

28.

Sims P L, Singh J S. 1978. The structure and function of ten western North American grasslands. III. Net primary production, turnover and efficiencies of energy capture and water use. Journal of Ecology 66: 573-597.

29.

Singh S, Kar A, Joshi DC, Ram B, Kumar S, Vats PC, Singh N, Raina P, Kolarkar AS and Dhir RP. 1992. Desertification mapping in Western Rajasthan. Annals of Arid Zone 31: 237-246.

30.

Taddese Y. 2001. Land degradation: A challenge to Ethiopia. Environmental Management 27: 815-824.

31.

Zehtabian G, and Jafari R. 2002 Evaluation of water resources degradation in Kashan area using desertification model. Journal of Ecology 30: 19-30.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy