- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2287-8327
- E-ISSN2288-1220
- SCOPUS, KCI
ISSN : 2287-8327
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.48)
- 2023 (Vol.47)
- 2022 (Vol.46)
- 2021 (Vol.45)
- 2020 (Vol.44)
- 2019 (Vol.43)
- 2018 (Vol.42)
- 2017 (Vol.41)
- 2016 (Vol.39)
- 2015 (Vol.38)
- 2014 (Vol.37)
- 2013 (Vol.36)
- 2012 (Vol.35)
- 2011 (Vol.34)
- 2010 (Vol.33)
- 2009 (Vol.32)
- 2008 (Vol.31)
- 2007 (Vol.30)
- 2006 (Vol.29)
- 2005 (Vol.28)
- 2004 (Vol.27)
- 2003 (Vol.26)
- 2002 (Vol.25)
- 2001 (Vol.24)
Building capacity for ecological assessment using diatoms in UK rivers
Abstract
Diatoms have become an integral part of the UK’s freshwater monitoring strategy over the past two decades, mostly in response to increasingly stringent European Union (EU) legislation. The use of diatoms is based on strong correlations between diatom assemblages and environmental variables, and from knowledge of the “expected” (= “reference”) state of each river. The nationwide overview of the ecological health of rivers this gives allows those stretches of rivers which fail to meet EU criteria to be identified. This, in turn, allows appropriate remediation measures to be planned. Because diatom assemblages vary in space and time, even within a single water body, effective use of diatoms requires a consistent approach in order to minimise uncertainty. This includes the use of methods which comply with European Standards,a training and accreditation scheme for analysts, and a suite of quality assurance methods. Those aspects of uncertainty that cannot be readily controlled have been quantified and all estimates of ecological status are accompanied by the appropriate “confidence of class” and “risk of misclassification”. This, in turn, helps planners prioritise those locations which are most likely to benefit from remediation.
- keywords
- diatoms, monitoring, rivers, eutrophication, quality assurance
Reference
Bennion H, Burgess A, Juggins S, Kelly M, Reddihough G, Yallop M. 2012. Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using diatoms. Science Report SC070034/TR3, Environment Agency, Bristol.
Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, Brucet S, Courrat A, Poikane S, Solimini A, van de Bund W, Zampoukasb N, Hering D. 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecological Indicators 18: 31-41.
CEN. 2003. Water quality - Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pretreatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. EN 13946: 2003. Comité European de Normalisation, Geneva.
CEN. 2004. Water quality - Guidance standard for the identification, enumeration and interpretation of benthic diatom samples from running waters. EN 14407:2004. Comité European de Normalisation, Geneva.
Dines RA, Murray-Bligh J. 2000. Quality assurance and RIVPACS. pp. 71-78. In: Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and other techniques (Edited by Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW & Furse MT).Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside.
Environment Agency. 2007. Common Freshwater Diatoms of Britain and Ireland. CD-ROM produced by Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
European Community. 1991. Council directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/ EEC). Official Journal of the European Community Series L 135/40-52.
European Community. 1992. Council directive of 21 May 1992 concerning the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna. Official Journal of the European Community Series L 206/7-50.
European Union . 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 20000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities Series L 327: 1-73.
Juggins S, Kelly MG. 2012. A WFD compatible approach to assess acidification in UK and Irish rivers. Science Report SC070034/TR2, Environment Agency, Bristol.
Kahlert M, Albert R-L, Antilla EL, Bengtsson R, Bigler C, Eskola T, Gälman V, Gottschalk S, Herlitz E, Jarlman A, Kasperoviciene J, Kokocinski M, Luup H, Miettinen J, Paunksnyte I, Piirsoo K, Quintana I, Raunio J, Sandell B, Simola H, Sundberg H, Vilbaste S , Weckström J. 2009. Harmonization is more important than experience—results of the first Nordic–Baltic diatom intercalibration exercise 2007 (stream monitoring). Journal of Applied Phycology 21: 471-482.
Kelly MG. 2000. Identification of Common Benthic Diatoms in Rivers. Field Studies 9: 583-700.
Kelly MG. 2001. Use of similarity measures for quality control of benthic diatom samples. Water Research 35: 2784- 2788.
Kelly MG, Yallop M. 2012. A streamlined taxonomy for the Trophic Diatom Index. Science Report SC070034/TR1, Environment Agency, Bristol.
Kelly MG, Whitton BA. 1995. The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7: 433-444.
Kelly MG, Adams C, Graves AC, Jamieson J, Krokowski J, Lycett EB, Murray-Bligh J, Pritchard S, Wilkins C. 2001. The Trophic Diatom Index: A User’s Manual. Revised Edition. R&D Technical Report E2/TR2, Bristol: Environment Agency.
Kelly MG, Juggins S, Guthrie R, Pritchard S, Jamieson J, Rippey B, Hirst H, Yallop M. 2008a. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology 53: 403-422.
Kelly MG, King L, Jones RI, Barker PA, Jamieson BJ. 2008b. Validation of diatoms as proxies for phytobenthos when assessing ecological status in lakes. Hydrobiologia 610: 125-129.
Kelly MG, Bennett C, Coste M, Delgado C, Delmas F, Denys L, Ector L, Fauville C, Ferreol M, Golub M, Jarlman A, Kahlert M, Lucey J, ní Chatháin B, Pardo I, Pfister P, Picinska-Faltynowicz J, Rosebery J, Schranz C, Schaumburg J, van Dam H, Vilbaste S. 2009a. A comparison of national approaches to setting ecological status boundaries in phytobenthos assessment for the European Water Framework Directive: results of an intercalibration exercise. Hydrobiologia 629: 169-182.
Kelly MG, Bennion H, Burgess A, Elllis J, Juggins S, Guthrie R, Jamieson BJ, Adriaenseens V, Yallop ML. 2009b. Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms, Hydrobiologia 633: 5-15.
Kelly MG, King L, ní Chatháin B. 2009c. The conceptual basis of ecological status assessments using diatoms. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy: Biology and Environment 109B: 175-189.
Kelly MG, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Kahlert M, Almeida SFP, Bennett C, Bottin M, Delmas F, Descy J-P, Dörflinger G, Kennedy B, Marvan P, Opatrilova L, Pardo I, Pfister P, Rosebery J, Schneider S, Vilbaste S. 2012. Establishing expectations for pan-European diatom based ecological status assessments. Ecological Indicators 20: 177-186.
Moon J. 1999. Learning Journals: A Handbook for Academics, Students and Professional Development. Kogan Page, London.
Nõges P, van de Bund W, Cardoso AC, Solimini AG, Heiskanen A-S. 2009. Assessment of the Ecological Status of European Surface Waters. Hydrobiologia 633: 1-211.
Page T, Heathwaite AL, Moss B, Reynolds C, Beven KJ, Pope L, Willows R. 2012. Managing the impacts of nutrient enrichment on river systems: dealing with complex uncertainties in risk analysis. Freshwater Biology 57: 108-123.
Pardo I, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Wasson J-G, Owen R, van de Bund W, Kelly M, Bennett C, Birk S, Buffagni A, Erba S, Mengin N, Murray-Bligh J, Ofenböeck G. 2012. The European reference condition concept: A scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment 420: 33-42.
Wright JF, Armitage PD, Furse MT, Moss D. 1989. Prediction of invertebrate communities using stream measurements. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 4: 147-155.
Yallop M, Hirst H, Kelly M, Juggins S, Jamieson J, Guthrie R. 2009. Validation of ecological status concepts in UK rivers using historic diatom samples. Aquatic Botany 90:289-295.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations