바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Phytoremediation potential of indigenous Ghanaian grass and grass-like species grown on used motor oil contaminated soils

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2014, v.37 no.2, pp.41-51
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2014.006
Abednego Akutam (University of Ghana)
Alexander Nii Moi Pappoe (University of Cape Coast)
Frederick Ato Armah (Western University)
Lewis Enu-Kwesi (University of Ghana)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study investigated the ability of Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz.) S.T. Blake (Poaceae), Cyperus ligularis L. (Cyperaceae), Commelina erecta L. (Commelinaceae), Mariscus umbellatus (Rottb.) Vahl (Cyperaceae), Fimbistylis miliacea L. (Cypera¬ceae) and Torulinium odoratum L. (Cyperaceae) to clean up various levels of used motor oil (UMO) contaminated soils. The plants were grown in 2 kg garden soils treated to 0%, 1%, 5% and 10% levels of UMO contamination. The plant growth parameters, chlorophyll contents and dry weight of test plants were measured. The phytoremediation ability of these test plants were assessed by measuring the uptake of hydrocarbons in terms of total hydrocarbon content (THC) as well as their percentage degradation values. There was significant (P < 0.05) reduction in leaf chlorophyll contents and dry weights of the test plant species planted in UMO contaminated soils. THC as well as the percentage uptake (or degra¬dation) of hydrocarbons were both lowest in C. ligularis but highest in T. odoratum in all cases. The phytoremediation potential of test plants was highest in soils contaminated with 5% UMO. Based on the results of this study, all test plants with the exception of C. ligularis were potentially capable of undertaking phytoremediation. However, B. bladhii and T. odoratum proved most effective in the uptake and degradation of UMO.

keywords
Bothriochloa bladhii, contamination, motor oil, organic, phytoremediation, Torulinium odoratum

Reference

1.

Achuba FI, Peretiemo-Clarke BO. 2008. Effect of spent engine oil on soil catalase and dehydrogenase activities. Int Agrophysics 22: 1-4.

2.

Adenipekun CO, Oyetunji OJ, Kassim LS. 2008. Effect of spent engine oil on the growth parameters and chlorophyll content of Corchorus olitorius Linn. Environmentalist 28: 446-450.

3.

ASTM. 1993. Standard test method for liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of soils ASTM standard (D4318-84). In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04.08. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia, PA.

4.

Burken JG, Schnoor JL. 1997. Uptake and metabolism of atrazine by poplar trees. Environ Sci Technol 31: 1399-1406.

5.

Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. 2006. Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil: A review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev 19: 50–62.

6.

Carter MR, Gregorich EG. 2007. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

7.

Dai Y, Shen Z, Liu Y, Wang L, Hannaway D, Lu H. 2009. Effects of shade treatments on the photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll fluorescence, and chlorophyll content of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum Diels et Gilg. Environ Exp Bot 65: 177-182.

8.

Dominguez-RosadoE, Pichtel J, Coughlin M. 2004. Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with used motor oil. 1. Enhanced microbial activities from laboratory and growth chamber studies. Environ Eng Sci 21: 157–168.

9.

Eze PN, Udeigwe TK, Stietiya MH. 2010. Distribution and potential source evaluation of heavy metals in prominent soils of Accra Plains, Ghana. Geoderma 156: 357-362.

10.

Frick CM, Farrel RE, Germida JJ. 1999. Assessments of phytoremediation as an in-situ technique for cleaning oil contaminated sites. A report prepared for the Petroleum Technology Alliance, Canada.

11.

Gao YZ, Ling WT, Zhu LZ, Zhao BW, Zheng QS. 2007. Surfactant-enhanced phytoremediation of soils contaminated with hydrophobic organic contaminants: Potential and assessment. Pedosphere 17: 409-418.

12.

Garbisu C, Alkorta I. 2001. Phytoextraction: a cost-effective plant-based technology for the removal of metals from the environment. Bioresour Technol 77: 229-236.

13.

Harms H, Bokern M, Kolb M, Bock C. 2003. Transformation of organic contaminants by different plant systems. In: Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants (McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL, eds). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp 285–316.

14.

Hughes JB, Shanks J, Vanderford M, Lauritzen J, Bhadra R. 1997. Transformation of TNT by aquatic plants and plant tissue cultures. Environ Sci Technol 31: 266-271.

15.

Kayode J, Olowoyo O, Oyedeji A. 2009. The effects of used engine oil pollution on the growth and earth seedling performance of Vigna uniguiculata and Zea mays. Res J Soil Biol 1: 15-19.

16.

Krämer U, Talke IN, Hanikenne M. 2007. Transition metal transport. FEBS Lett 581: 2263-2272.

17.

Merkl, N 2005. Phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils in the tropics. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim, pp 126-131.

18.

Merkl, N, Schultze-Kraft R, Infante C. 2005. Assessment of tropical grasses and legumes for phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 165: 195–209.

19.

Odjegba VJ, Sadiq AO. 2002. Effect of spent engine oil on the growth parameters, chlorophyll and protein levels of Amaranthus hybridus L. Environmentalist 22: 23-28.

20.

Ogbo EM, Avwerosovwe U, Odogu G. 2009. Screening of four common Nigerian weeds for use in phytoremediation of soil contaminated with spent lubricating oil. Afr J Plant Sci 3: 102-106.

21.

Okieimen CO, Okieimen, FE. (2005). Bioremediation of crude oil polluted soil – Effect of poultry droppings and natural rubber processing Sludge application on biodegradatio of petroleum hydrocarbons. Environ Sci 12: 1-8.

22.

Okonokhua BO, Ikhajiagbe B, Anoliefo GO, Emede TO. 2007. The effects of spent engine oil on soil properties and growth of maize (Zea mays L.). J Appl Sci Environ Manage 11: 147–152.

23.

Olson PE, Reardon KF, Pilon-Smits EAH. 2003. Ecology of rhizosphere bioremediation. In: Phytoremediation: Transformation and Control of Contaminants (McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL, eds). Wiley, New York, pp. 317–354.

24.

Palmroth MRT, Pitchel J, Puhakka JA. 2002. Phytoremediation of subarctic soil contaminated with diesel fuel. Bioresour Technol 84: 221–228.

25.

Patrick-Iwuanyanwu KC, Ogwe GO, Onwuka FC. 2010. The hepatotoxic effects of the water-soluble fraction of spent lubricating oil in Wistar Albino Rats. The Internet J Toxicol. DOI 10.5580/1144.

26.

Reichenauer TG, Germida JJ. 2008. Phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soil and groundwater. Chem Sus Chem 1: 708-717.

27.

Shang TQ, Newman LA, Gordon MP. 2003. Fate of tricholorethylene in terrestrial plants. In: Phytoremediation: Transformation and control of contaminants (Mc- Cutcheon SC, Schnoor JL, eds). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 529-560.

28.

Singh SK, Srivastava RK, John S. 2009. Studies on soil contamination due to used motor oil and its remediation. Can Geotech J 46: 1077-1083.

29.

Spiares JDE, Kenwrthy K, Rhykerd R. 2001. Emergence and height of plants seeded in crude oil contaminated soil. Texas J Agric Nat Resour 14: 37-46.

30.

Van Dyke F. 2008. Conservation Biology: Foundations, Concepts, Applications. 2nd ed. Springer, New York.

31.

Walkley, A. 1947. A Critical examination of a rapid method for determination of organic carbon in soils - effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63: 251-264.

32.

Winnike‐McMillan SK, Zhang Q, Davis LC, Erickson LE, Schnoor JL. 2003. Phytoremediation of methyl tertiarybutyl ether. In: Phytoremediation: Transformation and Control of Contaminants (McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL, eds). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, pp 805-828.

33.

Witham FH, Blaydes BF, Devlin RM. 1971. Experiments in plant physiology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

Journal of Ecology and Environment