바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Effects of local conspecific abundance on seed set and seed predation, and control of Carpinus laxiflora (Betulaceae) population density

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2015, v.38 no.1, pp.39-45
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.004
Takuro Katori (Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University)
Tohru Nakashizuka (Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this study, the dependence of local conspecific abundance on seed set and predation was examined, and determinates of population density of the temperate tree species Carpinus laxiflora (Betulaceae) in Inagi city, Tokyo, Japan were identi¬fied. During a good seed year (2013), seeds were sampled from 27 individuals and categorized as Sound, Empty, Predated, Immature, Decayed, or Broken. Empty seeds were identified as those that failed to fertilize and predation rates were defined as the proportion of seeds that were affected by predators. The proportion of the seed set that was fertilized was significantly positively correlated with local abundance of conspecific trees, while the proportion of seeds that escaped predation was significantly negatively correlated with local abundance of conspecific trees. Thereby, the production of Sound seeds was highest at sites with moderate local conspecific abundance. Although this phenomenon was only ob¬served in a few cases, it clearly showed optimal reproductive success under conditions of moderate density of conspecific reproductive adults, suggesting a mechanism that controls the population density of this species.

keywords
Carpinus laxiflora, Janzen-Connell model, population density, reproduction success, seed predation, seed set

Reference

1.

Abe S, Masaki T, Nakashizuka T. 1995. Factors influencing sapling composition in canopy gaps of a temperate deciduous forest. Vegetatio 120: 21-32.

2.

Brostrom G. 2013. glmmML: Generalized linear models with clustering. R package version 1.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmmML. Accessed 14 October 2014.

3.

Burkey TV. 1994. Tropical tree species diversity: a test of the Janzen-Connell model. Oecologia 97: 533-540.

4.

Clark DA, Clark DB. 1984. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen-Connell model. Am Nat 124: 769-788.

5.

Connell JH. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In: Dynamics of Populations (Den Boer PJ, Gradwell GR, eds). PUDOC, Wageningen, pp 298-312.

6.

Dauber J, Biesmeijer JC, Gabriel D, Kunin WE, Lamborn E, Meyer B, Nielsen A, Potts SG, Roberts SPM, Sõber V, Settele J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Stout JC, Teder T, Tscheulin T, Vivarelli D, Petanidou T. 2010. Effects of patch size and density on flower visitation and seed set of wild plants: a pan-European approach. J Ecol 98: 188-196.

7.

De Crop E, Brys R, Hoffmann M. 2012. The impact of habitat fragmentation on the interaction between Centaurium erythraea (Gentianaceae) and its specialized seed predator Stenoptilia zophodactylus (Pterophoridae, Lepidoptera). Ecol Res 27: 967-974.

8.

Fujimori N, Samejima H, Kenta T, Ichie T, Shibata M, Iida S, Nakashizuka T. 2006. Reproductive success and disweretance to conspecific adults in the sparsely distributed tree Kalopanax pictus. J Plant Res 119: 195-203.

9.

García D, Chacoff NP. 2007. Scale-dependent effects of habitat fragmentation on hawthorn pollination, frugivory, and seed predation. Conserv Biol 21: 400-411.

10.

Ghazoul J, Liston KA, Boyle TJB. 1998. Disturbance-induced density-dependent seed set in Shorea siamensis (Dipterocarpaceae), a tropical forest tree. J Ecol 86: 462-473.

11.

Gilbert GS. 2002. Evolutionary ecology of plant diseases in natural ecosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40: 13-43.

12.

House SM. 1993. Pollination success in a population of dioecious rain forest trees. Oecologia 96: 555-561.

13.

Howe H, Miriti MN. 2004. When seed dispersal matters. Bio-Science 54: 651-660.

14.

Hyatt LA, Rosenberg MS, Howard TG, Bole G, Fang W, Anastasia J, Brown K, Grella R, Hinman K, Kurdziel JP, Gurevitch J. 2003. The distance dependence prediction of the Janzen-Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis. Oikos 103: 590-602.

15.

Iida S, Nakashizuka T. 1995. Forest fragmentation and its effect on species diversity in sub-urban coppice forests in Japan. For Ecol Manage 73: 197-210.

16.

Ito K. 1989. Betulaceae. In: Wild Flowers of Japan, Woody Plants I (Satake Y, Hara H, Watari H, Tominari T, eds). Heibonsha, Tokyo, pp 52-65. (in Japanese)

17.

Jakobsson A, Ågren J. 2014. Distance to semi‑natural grassland influences seed production of insect‑pollinated herbs. Oecologia 175: 199-208.

18.

Janzen DH. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Nat 104: 501-528.

19.

Janzen DH. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2: 465-492.

20.

Japan Meteorological Agency. 1981-2010. The mean annual and maen monthly AMeDAS data in Huchu. http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/nml_amd_ym.php?prec_no=44&block_no=1133&year=&month=&day=&view=. Accessed 18 September 2014. (in Japanese)

21.

Knapp EE, Goedde MA, Rice KJ. 2001. Pollen-limited reproduction in blue oak: implications for wind pollination in fragmented populations. Oecologia 128: 48-55.

22.

Lambers JHR, Clark JS, Beckage B. 2002. Density-dependent mortality and the latitudinal gradient in species diversity. Nature 417: 732-735.

23.

Mangan SA, Schnitzer SA, Herre EA, Mack KML, Valencia MC, Sanchez EI, Bever JD. 2010. Negative plant–soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest. Nature 466: 752-755.

24.

Masaki T, Suzuki W, Niiyama K, Iida S, Tanaka H, Nakashizuka T. 1992. Community structure of a species-rich temperate forest, Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan. Vegetatio 98: 97-111.

25.

Miyawaki A. 1986. Vegetation of Japan: Kanto. Vol, 7. Shibundo, Tokyo. (in Japanese)

26.

Nakanishi S, Ohba T, Takeda Y, Hattori T. 1983. Illustration of Vegetation in Japan, Vol. I, Forest Vegetation. Hoikusha, Osaka. (in Japanese)

27.

Petermann JS, Fergus AJF, Turnbull LA, Schmid B. 2008. Janzen–Connell effects are widespread and strong enough to maintain diversity in grasslands. Ecology 89: 2399-2406.

28.

R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

29.

Shibata M. 2006. Meanings of seed set synchronization in many species. In: Forest Ecology, with Long-term Perspectives (The Society for the Study of Species Biology, ed). Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan Co., Tokyo, pp 39-57. (in Japanese)

30.

Shibata M, Masaki T, Tanaka H, Niiyama K, Iida S, Abe S, Nakashizuka T. 2010. Effects of abiotic and biotic factors and stochasticity on tree regeneration in a temperate forest community. Ecoscience 17: 137-145.

31.

Shibata M, Tanaka H, Iida S, Abe S, Masaki T, Niiyama K, Nakashizuka T. 2002. Synchronized annual seed production by 16 principal tree species in a temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecology 83: 1727-1742.

32.

Silander JA Jr. 1978. Density−dependent control of reproductive success in Cassia biflora. Biotropica 10: 292-296.

33.

Silvertown JW. 1980. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in trees. Biol J Linn Soc 14: 235-250.

34.

Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Tscharntke T. 2001. Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 1685-1690.

Journal of Ecology and Environment