바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.38 No.2
Citation Share

Regional land cover patterns, changes and potential relationships with scaled quail (Callipepla squamata) abundance

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2015, v.38 no.2, pp.185-193
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.020

X. Ben Wu (Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2138)
Fred E. Smeins (Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2138)
Nova J. Silvy (Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2258,)
Markus J. Peterson (Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2258,)
X., B. W. , Fred, E. S. , Nova, J. S. , & Markus, J. P. (2015). Regional land cover patterns, changes and potential relationships with scaled quail (Callipepla squamata) abundance. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 38(2), 185-193, https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.020
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

A dramatic decline in the abundance of the scaled quail (Callipepla squamata) has been observed across most of its geographic range. In order to evaluate the influence of land cover patterns and their changes on scaled quail abundance, we examined landscape patterns and their changes from the 1970s to the1990s in two large ecoregions with contrasting population trends: (1) the Rolling Plains ecoregion with a significantly decreased scaled quail population and (2) the South Texas Plains ecoregion with a relatively stable scaled quail population. The National Land Cover Database (NLCD) and the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Land Use/Land Cover data were used to quantify landscape patterns and their changes based on 80 randomly located 20×20 km2 windows in each of the ecoregions. We found that landscapes in the Rolling Plains and the South Texas Plains were considerably different in composition and spatial characteristics related to scaled quail habitats. The landscapes in the South Texas Plains had significantly more shrubland and less grassland-herbaceous rangeland; and except for shrublands, they were more fragmented, with greater interspersion among land cover classes. Correlation analysis between the landscape metrics and the quail-abundance-survey data showed that shrublands appeared to be more important for scaled quail in the South Texas Plains, while grassland-herbaceous range¬lands and pasture-croplands were essential to scaled quail habitats in the Rolling Plains. The decrease in the amount of grassland-herbaceous rangeland and spatial aggregation of pasture-croplands has likely contributed to the population decline of scaled quails in the Rolling Plains ecoregion.

keywords
Callipepla squamata, landscape change, landscape pattern metrics, Rolling Plains, scaled quail, South Texas Plains

Reference

1.

Bridges AS, Peterson MJ, Silvy NJ, Smeins FE, Wu XB. 2002. Landscape-scale land-cover change and long-term abundance of scaled quail and northern bobwhite in Texas. Proc Natl Quail Symp 5: 161-167.

2.

Elkie PC, Rempel RS, Carr A. 1999. Patch Analyst User’s Manual: A Tool for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Boreal Science, Northwest Science & Technology, Thunder Bay.

3.

Environmental Systems Research Institute. 1998. Working with ArcView Spatial Analyst. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) Inc., Redlands, CA.

4.

Geissler PH, Sauer JR. 1990. Topics in route-regression analysis. In: Survey Designs and Statistical Methods for the Estimation of Avian Population Trends (Sauer JR, S Droege, eds). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, D.C., pp 54-57.

5.

Goodwin JG Jr, Hungerford CR. 1977. Habitat used by native Gambel’s and scaled quail and released masked bobwhite quail in southern Arizona. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.

6.

Guthery FS, King NM, Kuvlesky WP Jr, DeStefano S, Gall SA, Silvy NJ. 2001. Comparative habitat use by three quails in desert grassland. J Wildl Manage 65: 850-860.

7.

Leyva-Espinosa IR. 2000. Use of broad-scale data to assess changes of scaled quail population in Texas. PhD Dissertation. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

8.

McGarigal K, Marks BJ. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.

9.

Peterson MJ. 2001. Northern bobwhite and scaled quail abundance and hunting regulation: a Texas example. J Wildl Manage 65: 828-837.

10.

Reid RR, Grue CE, Silvy NJ. 1979. Competition between bobwhite and scaled quail for habitat in Texas. Proc Annu Conf Southeastern Fish Wildl Agencies 33: 146-153.

11.

Rho P. 2003. GIS-based multiple-scaled study on scaled quail. PhD Dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

12.

Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Vogelmann JE, Jones KB. 2000. National land-cover pattern data. Ecology 81: 604-604.

13.

Rollins D. 2000. Status, ecology and management of scaled quail in West Texas. In: Quail IV (Brennan LA, Palmer WE, Burger LW Jr, Pruden TL, eds). Proceedings of the Fourth National Quail Symposium. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL, pp165-172.

14.

Sauer JR, Link WA, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ Jr. 2013. The North American breeding bird survey 1966-2011: summary analysis and species accounts. North American Fauna 79: 1-32.

15.

Schemnitz SD. 1961. Ecology of the scaled quail in the Oklahoma Panhandle. Wildl Monogr 8: 3-47.

16.

Schemnitz SD. 1993. Scaled quail habitats revisited – Oklahoma panhandle. In: Quail III (Church KE, Dailey TV, eds). Proceedings of the 3rd National Quail Symposium. Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Pratt, KS, pp143–147.

17.

Silvy NJ, Rollins D, Whisenant SW. 2007. Scaled quail ecology and life history In: Texas Quails: Ecology and Management (Brennan LA, ed). Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX, pp 65-88.

18.

Stormer FA. 1981. Characteristics of Scaled Quail Loafing Coverts in Northwest Texas. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.

19.

Stormer FA. 1984. Night-roosting habitat of scaled quail. J Wildl Manage 48: 191-197.

20.

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1990. Land Use and Land Cover Digital Data from 1:250,000- and 1:100,000-Scale Maps: Data User’s Guide 4. United States Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

21.

Uuemaa E, Antrop M, Roosaare J, Marja R, Mander U. 2009. Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Rev Landscape Res 3: 1-28.

22.

Wallmo OC. 1957. Ecology of scaled quail in west Texas. PhD Dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

23.

Wilson DE. 1992. Small game research and surveys: quail harvest regulations. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Performance Report W-126-R-1, Job No. 4.01, Austin, Texas.

24.

Wilson MH, Crawford JA. 1987. Habitat selection by Texas bobwhites and chestnut-bellied scaled quail in south Texas. J Wildl Manage 51: 575-582.

25.

Wu XB, Smeins FE, Slack RD. 2002. Fundamentals of Ecology Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy