바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Ecological health assessments using multiple parameters of fish blood tissues to community along with water chemistry in urban streams

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2015, v.38 no.3, pp.307-318
https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.031




  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to identify multi-level stressors from blood biomarkers to community-level bioindica¬tors and diagnose the stream ecosystem health in polluted streams. Blood chemistry such as total protein (TPro), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), total cholesterol (TCho) and albumin (Alb) were analyzed from sentinel fish tissues; the functions of kidney, gill and liver were significantly decreased in the impacted zone (Iz), compared to the control zone (Cz). Histo¬pathological analysis showed that fish liver tissues were normal in the Cz. Fish liver tissues in the Iz, however, showed large cell necrosis and degeneration and also had moderate lobular inflammation and inflammatory cell infiltration of lymphocytic histocytes. Species biotic index (SBI) at species level and stream health assessment (SHA) at community level indicated that chemical impacts were evident in the Iz (ecological health; poor - very poor), and this was matched with the blood tissue analysis and histopathological analysis. The impairments of the streams were supported by water chemistry analysis (nitrogen, phosphorus). Tolerance guild analysis and trophic guild analysis of fish were showed sig¬nificant differences (P < 0.01) between Cz and Iz. Overall, multiple parameter analysis from biomarker level (blood tissues) to bioindicator level (community health) showed significantly greater impacts in the Iz than Cz. This approach may be effective as a monitoring tool in identifying the multilateral and forthcoming problems related to chemical pollution and habitat degradation of stream ecosystems.

keywords
blood chemistry, health assessment, histopathological analysis, species biotic index

Reference

1.

Adams SM. 2002. Biological indicators of aquatic ecosystem stress: introduction and overview. In: Biological Indicators of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress (Adams SM, ed). American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 1-11.

2.

Adams SM, Greeley MS. 2000. Ecotoxicological indicators of water quality: using multi-response indicators to assess the health of aquatic ecosystems. Water Air Soil Pollut 123: 103-115.

3.

Adams SM, Ham KD, Greeley MS, LeHew RF, Hinton DE, Saylor CF. 1996. Downstream gradients in bioindicator responses: Point source contaminant effects on fish health. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53: 2177-2187.

4.

Adams SM, Tremblay LA. 2003. Integration of chemical and biological tools in environmental management and regulation. Australas J Ecotoxicol 9: 157-164.

5.

An KG, Kim DS, Kong DS, Kim SD. 2004. Integrative assessments of a temperate stream based on a multimetric determination of biological integrity, physical habitat evaluations, and toxicity tests. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73: 471-478.

6.

An KG, Kim JK. 2007. Ecological impact analysis of a stream on the dam construction using species biotic index (SBI) as a tool of ecosystem health assessment. Korean J Limnol 40: 495-502.

7.

An KG, Lee JY, Bae DY, Kim JH, Hwang SJ, Won DH, Lee JK, Kim CS. 2006. Ecological assessments of aquatic environment using multi-metric model in major nationwide stream watersheds. J Korean Soc Water Qual 22: 796-804.

8.

An KG, Yeom DH, Lee SK. 2001. Rapid bioassessments of Kap Stream using the index of biological integrity. Korean J Environ Biol 19: 261-269.

9.

Anderson RO, Neumann RM. 1996. Length, weight, and associated structural indices. In: Fisheries Techniques (Murphy BR, Willis DW, eds). American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 447-482.

10.

Attrill MJ, Power M. 2002. Climatic influence on a marine fish assemblage. Nature 417: 275-278.

11.

Bae DY, An KG. 2006. Stream ecosystem Assessments, based on a biological multimetric parameter model and water chemistry analysis. Korean J Limnol 39: 198-208.

12.

Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. 2nd Ed. EPA-841-B-99-002. US. EPA Office of Water, Washington, DC.

13.

Brookes A, Shields FD. 1996. River channel restoration: guiding principles for sustainable projects. John Wiley, Chichester.

14.

Finney BP, Gregory-Eaves I, Sweetman J, Douglas MSV, Smol JP. 2000. Impacts of climatic change and fishing on Pacific salmon abundance over the past 300 years. Science 290: 795-799.

15.

Gibbons WN, Munkittrick KR. 1994. A sentinel monitoring framework for identifying fish population responses to industrial discharges. J Aquat Ecosyst Health 3: 227-237.

16.

Goede RW, Barton BA. 1990. Organismic indices and an autopsy-based assessment as indicators of health and condition of fish. In: Biological indicator of stress in fish (Adams SM, ed). American Fisheries Society Symposium, Bethesda, MD, pp 93-108.

17.

Gopal V, Parvathy S, Balasubramanian PR. 1997. Effect of heavy metals on the blood protein biochemistry of the fish Cyprinus carpio and its use as a bio-indicator of pollution stress. Environ Monit Assess 48: 117-124.

18.

Gore JA. 1985. The restoration of rivers and streams. Butterworth Publishers, Boston, MA.

19.

Hilsenhoff WL. 1988. Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family-level biotic index. J North Am Benthol Soc 7: 65-68.

20.

Hugueny B, Camara S, Samoura B, Magassouba M. 1996. Applying an index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages in a West African river. Hydrobiologia 331: 71-78.

21.

Kang N, Kang H, An KG. 2014. Analysis of fish DNA biomarkers as a molecular-level approach for ecological health assessments in an urban stream. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 93: 555-560.

22.

Karr JR. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27.

23.

Karr JR, Chu EW. 2000. Introduction: sustaining living rivers. In: Assessing the Ecological Integrity of Running Waters (Jungwirth M, Muhar S, Schmutz S, eds). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1-14.

24.

Karr JR, Dionne M. 1991. Designing surveys to assess biological integrity in lakes and reservoirs. In: Biological criteria: Research and Regulation-Proceedings of a symposium. EPA-44015-91-005. Office of Waters, US EPA, Washington, DC, pp 62-72.

25.

Kelly MG, Cazaubon A, Coring E, Dell’Uomo A, Ector L, Goldsmith B, Guasch H, Hurlimann J, Jarlman A, Kawecka B, Kwandrans J, Laugaste R, Lindstrom EA, Leitao M, Marvan P, Padisak J, Pipp E, Prygiel J, Rott E, Sabater S, van Dam H, Vizinet J. 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J Appl Phycol 10: 215-224.

26.

Kelly MG, Whitton BA. 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J Appl Phycol 7: 433-444.

27.

Kim IS, Park JY. 2002. Freshwater fish of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co., Seoul.

28.

Klemm DJ, Stober QJ, Lazorchak JM. 1993. Fish field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-92/111, Cincinnati, OH.

29.

Koizumi N, Matsumiya Y. 1997. Assessment of stream fish habitat based on index of biotic integrity. Bull Jpn Soc Fish Oceanogr 61: 144-156.

30.

Lam PK, Gray JS. 2003. The use of biomarkers in environmental monitoring programmes. Mar Poll Bull 46: 182-186.

31.

Lang C, l’Eplattenier G, Reymond O. 1989. Water quality in rivers of Western Switzerland: Application of an adaptable index based on benthic invertebrates. Aquat Sci 51: 224-234.

32.

Lang C, Reymond O. 1995. An improved index of environmental quality for Swiss rivers based on benthic invertebrates. Aquat Sci 57: 172-180.

33.

Lee RF, Steinert S. 2003. Use of the single cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay for detecting DNA damage in aquatic (marine and freshwater) animals. Mutat Res 544: 43-64.

34.

McCarty LS, Power M, Munkittrick KR. 2002. Bioindicators versus biomarkers in ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8: 159-164.

35.

Mela M, Randi MAF, Ventura DF, Carvalho CEV, Pelletier E, Oliveira Ribeiro CA. 2007. Effects of dietary methylmercury on liver and kidney histology in the neotropical fish Hoplias malabaricus. Ecotox Environ Safe 68: 426-435.

36.

Munkittrick KR, Dixon DG. 1989. A holistic approach to ecosystem health assessment using fish population characteristics. In: Environmental Bioassay Techniques and their Application (Munawar M, Dixon G, Mayfield CI, Reynoldson T, Sadar MH, eds). Hydrobiologia 188/189: 123-135.

37.

Munkittrick KR, McMaster ME, Van Der Kraak G, Portt C, Gibbons WN, Farwell A, Gray M. 2000. Development of methods for effects-driven cumulative effects assessment using fish populations: Moose River project. A Technical Publication of SETAC, Pensacola, FL.

38.

Nelson JS. 1994. Fishes of the world, 3rd Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

39.

Oberdorff T, Porcher JP. 1994. An index of biotic integrity to assess biological impacts of salmonid farm effluents on receiving waters. Aquaculture 119: 219-235.

40.

Ohio EPA. 1989. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: Vol. III. Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory method for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities. Technical Report. Columbus, OH.

41.

Olive PL, Banáth JP. 2006. The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells. Nat Protoc 1: 23-29.

42.

Peakall DB, Shugart LR. 1992. Biomarkers: Research and application in the assessment of environmental health. NATO ASI Series H: Cell Biology 68, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg.

43.

Peakall DW, Walker CH. 1994. The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (3). Vertebrates. Ecotoxicology 3: 173-179.

44.

Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD, Gross SK, Hughes RM. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. EPA-444-4-89-001. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, United states Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

45.

Robinet TT, Feunteun EE. 2002. Sublethal effects of exposure to chemical compounds: a cause for the decline in Atlantic eels. Ecotoxicology 11: 265-277.

46.

Rosenoer VM, Oratz M, Rothschild MA. 1977. Albumin structure, function and uses. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

47.

Sanders RE, Miltner RJ, Yoder CO, Rankin ET. 1999. The use of external deformities, erosion, lesions, tumors (DELT anomalies) in fish assemblages for characterizing aquatic resources: a case study of seven Ohio streams. In: Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources using Fish Communities (Simon TP, ed). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 225-246.

48.

Schmitt CJ, Dethloff GM. 2000. Biomonitoring of environmental status and trends (BEST) program: selected methods for monitoring chemical contaminants and their effects in aquatic ecosystems (No. USGS/BRD/ITR-2000-0005). US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Columbia, MO.

49.

Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. 1988. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 175: 184-191.

50.

Triebskorn R, Böhmer J, Braunbeck T, Honnen W, Köhler HR, Lehmann R, Oberemm A, Schwaiger J, Segner H, Schüürmann G, Traunspurger W. 2001. The project VALIMAR (VALIdation of bioMARkers for the assessment of small stream pollution): objectives, experimental design, summary of results, and recommendations for the application of biomarkers in risk assessment. J Aquat Ecosyst Stress Recovery 8: 161-178.

51.

US EPA. 1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxic control. EPA-505-2-90-001. US EPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC.

52.

US EPA. 2002. Summary of biological assessment programs and biocriteria development for states, tribes, territories, and interstate commissions: streams and wadable river. EPA-822-R-02-048. Office of Environmental Information and Office of Water, Washington, DC.

53.

Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NP. 2003. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 13: 57-149.

54.

Van Gestel CAM, Van Brummelen TC. 1996. Incorporation of the biomarker concept in ecotoxicology calls for a redefinition of terms. Ecotoxicology 5: 217-225.

55.

Water Framework Directive (EU WFD). 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy, Off J Eur Com 22: 12.

56.

Wepener V, Van Vuren JHJ, Chatiza FP, Mbizi Z, Slabbert L, Masola B. 2005. Active biomonitoring in freshwater environments: early warning signals from biomarkers in assessing biological effects of diffuse sources of pollutants. Phys Chem Earth Pt A/B/C 30: 751-761.

Journal of Ecology and Environment