- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2287-8327
- E-ISSN2288-1220
- SCOPUS, KCI
ISSN : 2287-8327
The effects of LEDs and duty ratio on the growth and physiological responses of Silene capitata Kom., endangered plant, in a plant factory
Abstract
Background: In this study, we observed their growth and physiological responses using a variety of duty ratio under the mixed light using red, blue, and white lights. The red+blue mixed light was treated with 95%, 90%, 85%, 80%, and 75% duty ratios and red+blue+white mixed light with 85% and 70% duty ratios. We examined the width and length of leaves, total number of leaves, and number of shoots to examine their growth responses. The physiological responses were studied by measuring their photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, chlorophyll content, and fluorescence (Fo, Fm, and Fv/Fm). Results: We found that lower duty ratio caused the length and width of the leaves to grow longer under red+blue mixed light but that it did not cause any difference in the red+blue+white mixed light condition. In addition, there was no difference in the number of leaves and shoots among all treatments. In the red+blue mixed light condition, the photosynthetic rate was no difference, but both transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were the highest at 95% duty ratio than in other ratios. Water use efficiency pattern was similar to that of photosynthetic rate; water use efficiency was no difference. Chlorophyll content was the highest at 95% duty ratios, and it was the least at 90%, 85%, and 75% duty ratio. Fo and Fm values were relatively high at 85% and 80% duty ratio and low at 90% duty ratio while Fv/Fm showed no difference. Conclusions: Under the red+blue+white mixed light, all physiological items showed no difference between 70 and 85% treatments. But, photosynthetic rate, water use efficiency, chlorophyll content, and Fv/Fm were relatively greater in the red+blue+white mixed light than in the red+blue mixed light. Therefore, red+blue+white mixed light treated with 70% duty ratio could lessen the environmental stress and save more power when cultivating Silene capitata in a plant factory.
- keywords
- Caryophyllaceae, Ecophysiological response, Environmental tolerance, Indoor plant, Light quality
Reference
Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Sánchez RA. Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science. 1990;247(4940):329–32. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4940.329.
Bjorkman O, Demmig B. Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta. 1987;170:489–504.
Cho KJ, Cho JY, Park IS, Oh W. Effects of duty ratio of pulsed LED light on growth and photosynthetic rate of lettuce grown in a plant factory system. J Korean Soc People Plants Environ. 2013;16(6):427–34. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe. 2013.16.6.427.
Goins GD, Yorio NC, Sanwo MM, Brown CS. Photomorphogenesis, photosynthesis, and seed yield of wheat plants grown under red lightemitting diodes (LEDs) with and without supplemental blue lighting. J Exp Bot. 1997;48(312):1407–13.
Hopkins W, Huner N. Introduction to plant physiology fourth edition. Hoboken:Wiley; 2008. p. 95–106.
Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press; 2001. p. 15–6.
Im JU, Yoon YC, Seo KW, Kim KH, Moon AK, Kim HT. Effect of LED light wavelength on chrysanthemum growth. Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory. 2013;22(1):49–54.
Kim JK, Yoon YJ, Kim KS, Sub Na JK, Choi KY. Effects of relative humidity and air injection on physiological and stomatal responses in phalaenopsis during acclimatization. Hort Sci Technol. 2018;36(2):193–201. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20180020.
Kim JW. Trend and direction for plant factory system. J Plant Biotechnol. 2010;37:442–55.
Kim SB, Lee KM, Kim HR, You YH. Effects of light sources, light quality on the growth response of leafy vegetables in closed-type plant factory system. Korean J Ecol Environ. 2014;47(1):32–40.
Kobayashi K, Amore T, Lazaro M. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for miniature hydroponic lettuce. Opt Photonics J. 2013;3(1):74–7.
Lee HJ, Chun JH, Kim SJ. Effects of pre harvest light treatments (LEDs, Fluorescent Lamp, UV-C) on glucosinolate contents in rocket salad (Eruca sativa). Hort Sci Technol. 2017;35(2):178–87. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20170021.
Lin KH, Huang MY, Huang WD, Hsu MH, Yang ZW, Yang CM. The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata). Sci Hortic. 2013;150(4):86–91.
Lu N, Maruo T, Johkan M, Hojho M, Tsukagoshi S, Ito Y, Ichimura T, Shinohara Y. Effects of supplemental lighting with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on tomato yield and quality of single-truss tomato plants growth at high planting density. Environ Control Biol. 2012;50(1):63–74.
Matsuda R, Ohashi-Kaneko K, Fujiwara K, Goto E, Kurata K. Photosynthetic characteristics of rice leaves grown under red light with or without supplemental blue light. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45(12):1870–4.
Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000;51(345):659–68.
Middleton L. Shade-Tolerant flowering plants: Adaptations and horti-cultural implications. Proc. XX EUCARPIA Symp. on New Ornamentals. 2001;552:95–102.
Ministry of Environment. White paper of environment. Sejong: Ministry of Environment; 2017. p. 47–9. pp 363-380
Mori Y, Takatsuji M, Yasuoka T. Effects of pulsed-red LD light on the growth of a plant. Laser Orig. 2002;30(10):602–5. https://doi.org/10.2184/lsj.30.602.
NIBR (2011) https://species.nibr.go.kr. Accessed 24 Oct 2018.
No HJ, Jeong HY. Well defined statistical analysis according to Statistica. Seoul:Hyungseul Publisher; 2002. p. 535–56.
Park JH, Lee EP, Lee SI, Jang RH, An KH, You YH. Effects of the light source of LEDs on the physiological and flowering response of endangered plant Silene capitata Kom. Korean J Environ Ecol. 2016;30(5):821–8.
Phansurin W, Jamaree T, Sakhonwasee S. Comparison of growth, development, and photosynthesis of petunia grown under white or red-blue LED lights. Hort Sci Technol. 2017;35(6):689–99. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20170073.
Richardson AD, Duigan SP, Berlyn GP. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol. 2002;153(1):185–94. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00289.x.
Trouwborst G, Oosterkamp J, Hogewoning SW, Harbinson J, Van Ieperen W. The responses of light interception, photosynthesis and fruit yield of cucumber to LED-lighting within the canopy. Physiol Plant. 2010;138:289–300.
Van den Berg AK, Perkins TD. Evaluation of a portable chlorophyll meter to estimate chlorophyll and nitrogen contents in sugar maple (Acer saccharum marsh.) leaves. For Ecol Manag. 2004;200(1–3):113–7.
Wang H, Gu M, Cui J, Shi K, Zhou Y, Yu J. Effects of light quality on CO2assimilation, chlorophyll-fluorescence quenching, expression of Calvin cycle genes and carbohydrate accumulation in Cucumis sativus. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2009;96(1):30–7.
Woitsch S, Romer S. Expression of xanthophyll biosynthetic genes during lightdependent chloroplast differentiation. Plant Physiol. 2003;132(3):1508–17.
Wojciechowska R, Kołton A, Długosz-Grochowska O, Żupnik M, Grzesiak W. The effect of LED lighting on photosynthetic parameters and weight of lamb’s lettuce (Valerianella locusta). Folia Hort. 2013;25(1):41–7.
Yorio NC, Goins GD, Kagie HR, Weeler RM, Sager JC. Improving spinach, radish, and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with blue light supplementation. Hortscience. 2001;36(2):380–3.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations