바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

C:N:P stoichiometry of particulate and dissolved organic matter in river waters and changes during decomposition

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2019, v.43 no.1, pp.14-21
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-018-0101-4
Mohammad Jahidul Islam (Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University)







  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Background: Stoichiometry plays an important role in understanding nutrient composition and cycling processes in aquatic ecosystems. Previous studies have considered C:N:P ratios constant for both DOM (dissolved organic matter) and POM (particulate organic matter). In this study, water samples were collected in the six major rivers in Korea and were incubated for 20 days. C:N:P ratios were determined during the time course of the incubations. This allowed us to examine the changes in N and P contents of organic matter during decomposition. Results: POM and DOM showed significant differences in N and P content and the elemental ratios changed during the course of decomposition; DOM showed higher C:N and C:P ratios than POM, and the C:N and C:P ratios increased during decomposition, indicating the preferential mineralization of P over N and N over C. Conclusions: The N and P contents of organic matter in aquatic ecosystem are far from constant and vary significantly during decomposition. More detailed information on the changes in C:N:P ratios will provide improved understanding of decomposition processes and improved modeling of aquatic ecosystems.

keywords
Organic matter C:N:P, POM, DOM, Labile and refractory organic matter, River water

Reference

1.

Anderson LA. On the hydrogen and oxygen contents of marine phytoplankton. Deep-Sea Res. 1995;42:1675–80.

2.

APHA (American Public Health Association). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2005.

3.

Cleveland CC, Liptzin DC. N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry. 2007;85:235–52.

4.

Cole TM, Wells SA. CE-QUAL-W2: a two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, version 3.71. User manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 2017.

5.

Cross WF, Wallace JB, Rosemond AD. Nutrient enrichment reduces constrains on material flows in a detritus-based food web. Ecology. 2007;88:2563–75.

6.

Dagg M, Benner R, Lohrenz S, Lawrence D. Transformation of dissolved and particulate materials on continental shelves influenced by large rivers:plume processes. Cont Shelf Res. 2004;24:833–58.

7.

Elser JJ, Schampel JH, Garcίa-Pichel F, Wade BD, Souza V, Eguiarte L, et al. Effects of phosphorus enrichment and grazing snails on modern stromatolitic microbial communities. Freshw Biol. 2005;50:1808–25.

8.

Fitter A, Hillebrand H. Microbial food web structure affects bottom-up effects and elemental stoichiometry in periphyton assemblages. Limnol Oceanogr. 2009;54:2183–200.

9.

Goldman JC, McCartthy JJ, Peavey DG. Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature. 1979;279:210–5.

10.

Guo L, Santschi PH. Isotopic and elemental characterization of colloidal organic matter from the Chesapeake Bay and Galveston Bay. Mar Chem. 1997;59:1–15.

11.

Hall SH, Smith VH, Lytle DA, Leibold MA. Constrains of primary producer N:P stoichiometry along N:P supply ratio gradients. Ecology. 2005;86:1894–904.

12.

Islam MJ, Jang C, Eom J, Jung S, Shin M-S, Lee Y, et al. The decomposition rates of organic phosphorus and organic nitrogen in river waters. J Freshw Ecol. 2013;28(2):239–50.

13.

Jeanneau L, Richard R, Shreeram I. Molecular fingerprinting of particulate organic matter as a new tool for its apportionment: changes along a headwater drainage in coarse, medium and fine particles as a function of rainfalls. Biogeosciences. 2018;15(4):973–85.

14.

Klausmeier CA, Litchman E, Daufresne T, Levin SA. Optimal nitrogen-tophosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton. Nature. 2004;429:171–4.

15.

Meybeck M. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus transport by world rivers. Am J Sci. 1982;282:401–50.

16.

Ruttenberg KC, Goni MA. Phosphorus distribution, C:N:P ratios and δ13C subOC in arctic, temperate, and tropical coastal sediments: tools for characterizing bulk sedimentary organic matter. Mar Geol. 1997;139:123–45.

17.

Sinsabaugh RL, Hill BH, Follstad Shah JJ. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment. Nature. 2009;462:795–8.

18.

Søndergaard M, PJLeB W, Cauwet G, Riemann B, Robinson C, Terzic S, et al. Net accumulation and flux of dissolved organic carbon and dissolved organic nitrogen in marine plankton communities. Limnol Oceanogr. 2000;45:1097–111.

19.

Stelzer RS, Lamberti GA. Ecological stoichiometry inrunning waters: periphyton chemical composition and snail growth. Ecology. 2001;83:1039–51.

20.

Sterner RW, Elser JJ. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002.

21.

Sterner RW, George N. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of cyprinid fishes. Ecology. 2000;81:127–40.

22.

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP) version 6.0 user’s manual. Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/823/B/95/003; 1985.

23.

Wetzel RG. Extracellular enzymatic interactions in aquatic ecosystems: storage, redistribution, and interspecific communication. In: Chrost RJ, editor. Microbial enzymes in aquatic environments. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1991. p. 6–28.

24.

Wetzel RG. Limnology-Lake and river ecosystems. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001.

Journal of Ecology and Environment