바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.43 No.2

Citation Share

The benefit of one cannot replace the other: seagrass and mangrove ecosystems at Santa Fe, Bantayan Island

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2019, v.43 no.2, pp.183-190
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0114-7
Ayana Rose R. Mendoza (University of San Carlos)
Jenny Marie R. Patalinghug (University of San Carlos)
Joshua Ybañez Divinagracia (University of San Carlos)
Ayana, R. R. M. , Jenny, M. R. P. , & Joshua, Y. D. (2019). The benefit of one cannot replace the other: seagrass and mangrove ecosystems at Santa Fe, Bantayan Island. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 43(2), 183-190, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0114-7

Abstract

Background: In the Philippines, the practice of planting mangroves over seagrass has been a practice done topromote coastline protection from damages done by storms. Despite the added protection to the coastline, the addition of an artificial ecosystem gradually inflicts damage to the ecosystem already established. In this study, seagrass communities that had no history of mangrove planting were compared with those that had mangrove planting. The percent substrate cover of seagrass in the sampling areas was determined, and the macroinvertebrates present in the sampling areas were also observed. The study was conducted based on reports of mangrove planting activity that disrupted seagrass functions on Santa Fe, Bantayan Island, Cebu. Transectquadrat method sampling was done to assess the chosen sites. Results: Six species of seagrass was found on the site without mangrove planting which was barangay Ocoy (Cymodocea sp., Thalassia sp., Halodule sp., Enhalus sp., Halophila sp., and Syringodium sp.) and had a higher percent cover, while only four were found on the site with mangrove planting (barangay Marikaban). It was also found that barangay Marikaban had a lesser Shannon-Wiener and Simpson’s index compared to barangay Ocoy. Jaccard’s index of similarity between the two sites was low. Conclusion: With the results of the assessment, we recommend proper monitoring of future mangrove planting activities and that these activities should not disrupt another ecosystem as all ecosystems are important.

keywords
Seagrass, Mangrove planting, Diversity index

Reference

1.

Bird E. Mangroves, geomorphology. In: Schwartz M, editor. Encyclopedia of coastal science. Encyclopedia of earth science series: Springer; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3880-1.

2.

Brander LM, Hussain SS, McVittie A, Verburg PH, de Groot RS, van der Ploeg S. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: a meta-analysis and value transfer application. Ecosyst Serv. 2012;1:62–9.

3.

Brown B. The significance of pollution in eliciting the ‘bleaching’ response in symbiotic cnidarians. Int J Environ Pollut. 2000;13:392–415.

4.

Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Management VII. Participatory Coastal Resource Assessment of Santa Fe, Cebu. Cebu: Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Management VII; 2009.

5.

Calumpong H, Menez E. Seagrass beds of the Philippines. Ann Trop Res. 1994;16:1-15.

6.

Codilla MZ. DENR told to stop planting mangroves in seagrass beds: Cebu Daily News; 2015a. https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/68698/denr-told-to-stopplanting-mangroves-in-seagrass-beds?utm_expid=.XqNwTug2W6nwDVUSgFJXed.1. Accessed 19 Oct 2018

7.

Codilla MZ. Bakhaw’ deprives seagrass fauna of their habitat: Cebu Daily News; 2015b. https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/70107/bakhaw-deprives-seagrassfauna-of-their-habitat?utm_expid=.XqNwTug2W6nwDVUSgFJXed.1. Accessed 19 Oct 2018

8.

Demopoulos AW, Smith CR. Invasive mangroves alter macrofaunal community structure and facilitate opportunistic exotics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;404:51–67.

9.

Ellison A, Farnsworth E, Twilley R. Facultative mutualism between red mangroves and root-fouling sponges in Belizean mangal. Ecology. 1996;77:2431–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265744.

10.

Fortes M. Wetland conservation and management in the Philippines. In: Wetlands ecosystems in Asia: function and management. Oxford: Elsevier; 2004. p. 233–62.

11.

Fourqurean J, Duarte C, Kennedy H, Marba N, Holmer M, Mateo M, et al. Seagrass ecosystems as a globally significant carbon stock. Nat Geosci. 2012;5:505–9.

12.

Greve T, Binzer T. Which factors regulate seagrass growth and distribution? In: European seagrasses: an introduction to monitoring and management. The monitoring and management of European beds project; 2004. p. 19–23.

13.

Jackson EL, Rowden AA, Atrill MJ, Jones M. The importance of seagrass beds as a habitat for fishery species. Oceanogr Mar Biol. 2001;39:269–304.

14.

Kristensen E. Mangrove crabs as ecosystem engineers; with emphasis on sediment processes. J Sea Res. 2008;59:30–43.

15.

Leung JY. Habitat heterogeneity affects ecological functions of macrobenthic communities in a mangrove: implication for the impact of restoration and afforestation. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2015;4:423–33.

16.

Mangubat EG. Will ‘bakhaw’ project spoil Bantayan seagrass beds?. Cebu daily News; 2012. https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/69477/will-bakhaw-projectspoil-bantayan-seagrass-beds?utm_expid=.XqNwTug2W6nwDVUSgFJXed.1. Accessed 19 Oct 2018.

17.

McKenzie L, Campbell S, Roder C. Seagrass-watch: manual for mapping and monitoring seagrass resources by community (citizen) volunteers. 2003. http://www.seagrasswatch.org/Methods/Manuals/SeagrassWatch_monitoring_guidelines_2ndEdition.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2018.

18.

Meode M, Montes E, Paloma A, Panal M, Pesquera N. Distribution and abundance of seagrasses of Bontoc, Southern Leyte. JESTEC. 2014;2:93–103.

19.

Orth RJ, Carruthers TJB, Dennison WC, Duarte CM, Fourqurean JW, Heck KL, Hughes AR, Kendrick GA, Kenworthy WJ, Olyarnik S, Short FT, Waycott M, Williams SL. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. BioScience. 2006;56:987–96.

20.

Park YS, Lek S, Baehr C, Jørgensen SE. Advanced modelling techniques studying global changes in environmental sciences, vol. 27. 1st ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 27.

21.

Primavera JH, Esteban JMA. A review of mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines: successes, failures and future prospects. Wetl Ecol Manag. 2008; 16:345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9101-y.

22.

Quintas KB. Stakeholders fail to solve mangrove planting issues: Philstar; 2015. https://www.philstar.com/cebu-news/2015/10/06/1508102/stakeholders-failsolve-mangrove-planting-issues. Accessed 19 Oct 2018.

23.

Roozbahani MM, Nabavi SMB, Farshchi P, Rasekh A. Studies on the benthic macroinvertebrates diversity species as bio-indicators of environmental health in Bahrekan Bay (Northwest of Persian Gulf). Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9:27.

24.

Rutzler K, Feller C. Mangrove swamp communities. Oceanus. 1988;40:17–24.

25.

Samson M, Rollon R. Growth performance of planted mangroves in the Philippines: revisiting forest management strategies. Ambio. 2008;37:234–40.

26.

Sharma S, Nadaoka K, Nakaoka M, Uy W, MacKenzie R, Friess D, Fortes M. Growth performance and structure of a mangrove afforestation project on a former seagrass bed, Mindanao Island, Philippines. Hydrobiologia. 2017;803:359–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3252-x.

27.

Simpson L, Feller I, Chapman S. Effects of competition and nutrient enrichment on Avicennia germinans in the salt marsh-mangrove ecotone. Aquat Bot. 2013;104:55–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.09.006.

28.

Vine P. Red Sea invertebrates. London: Immel Publishing; 1986.

29.

Wright J, Jones C. The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. BioScience. 2006;56:203–9.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy