- KOREAN
- P-ISSN2287-8327
- E-ISSN2288-1220
- SCOPUS, KCI
ISSN : 2287-8327
Biotic and spatial factors potentially explain the susceptibility of forests to direct hurricane damage
Andrew C. Millington (Flinders University College of Science and Enginee)
Charles W. Lafon (Texas A&M University College Station)
Abstract
Background: Ecologists continue to investigate the factors that potentially affect the pattern and magnitude of tree damage during catastrophic windstorms in forests. However, there still is a paucity of research on which trees are more vulnerable to direct damage by winds rather than being knocked down by the fall of another tree. We evaluated this question in a mixed hardwood–softwood forest within the Big Thicket National Preserve (BTNP) of southeast Texas, USA, which was substantially impacted by Hurricane Rita in September 2005. Results: We showed that multiple factors, including tree height, shade-tolerance, height-to-diameter ratio, and neighborhood density (i.e., pre-Rita stem distribution) significantly explained the susceptibility of trees to direct storm damage. We also found that no single factor had pervasive importance over the others and, instead, that all factors were tightly intertwined in a complex way, such that they often complemented each other, and that they contributed simultaneously to the overall susceptibility to and patterns of windstorm damage in the BTNP. Conclusions: Directly damaged trees greatly influence the forest by causing secondary damage to other trees. We propose that directly and indirectly damaged (or susceptible) trees should be considered separately when assessing or predicting the impact of windstorms on a forest ecosystem; to better predict the pathways of community structure reorganization and guide forest management and conservation practices. Forest managers are recommended to adopt a holistic view that considers and combines various components of the forest ecosystem when establishing strategies for mitigating the impact of catastrophic winds.
- keywords
- Disturbance, Hurricane Rita, Life history traits, Neighborhood density, Spatial point pattern analysis
Reference
Allen MS, Thapa V, Thapa V, Arévalo JR, Palmer MW. Windstorm damage and forest recovery: accelerated succession, stand structure, and spatial pattern over 25 years in two Minnesota forests. Plant Ecol. 2012;213:1833–42.
Ancelin P, Courbaud B, Fourcaud T. Development of an individual tree-based mechanical model to predict wind damage within forest stands. Forest Ecol Manag. 2004;203:101–21.
Batista WB, Platt WJ. Tree population responses to hurricane disturbance: syndromes in a south-eastern USA old-growth forest. J Ecol. 2003;91:197–212.
Burns RM, Honkala BH. Silvics of North America: Vol. 2. Hardwoods. USDA Agricultural: Washington; 1990.
Canham CD, Papaik MJ, Latty EF. Interspecific variation in susceptibility to windthrow as a function of tree size and storm severity for northern temperate tree species. Can J For Res. 2001;31:1–10.
Churchill DJ, Larson AJ, Dahlgreen MC, Franklin JF, Hessburg PF, Lutz JA. Restoring forest resilience: from reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring. Forest Ecol Manag. 2013;291:442–57.
Clinton BD, Baker CR. Catastrophic windthrow in the southern Appalachians: characteristics of pits and mounds and initial vegetation responses. Forest Ecol Manag. 2000;126:51–60.
Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science. 2000;288:1414–8.
Cremer KW, Borough CJ, McKinnell FH, Carter PR. Effects of stocking and thinning on wind damage in plantations. New Zeal J For Sci. 1982;12:244–68.
Egbäck S, Bullock BP, Isik F, McKeand SE. Height-diameter relationships for different genetic planting stock of loblolly pine at age 6. For Sci. 2015;61: 424–8.
Everham EM, Brokaw NVL. Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot Rev. 1996;62:113–85.
Foster DR. Species and stand response to catastrophic wind in central New England. USA J Ecol. 1988;76:135–51.
Foster DR, Boose ER. Patterns of forest damage resulting from catastrophic wind in central New England. USA J Ecol. 1992;80:79–98.
Franklin JF, Spies TA, van Pelt R, Carey AB, Thornburgh DA, Berg DR, Lindenmayer DB, Harmon ME, Keeton WS, Shaw DC, Bible K, Chen J. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. Forest Ecol Manag. 2002;155:399–423.
Gardiner B, Marshall B, Achim A, Belcher R, Wood C. The stability of different silvicultural systems: a wind-tunnel investigation. Forestry. 2005;78:471–84.
Gardiner BA, Quine CP. Management of forests to reduce the risk of abiotic damage—a review with particular reference to the effects of strong winds. Forest Ecol Manag. 2000;135:261–77.
Gardiner BA, Stacey GR, Belcher RE, Wood CJ. Field and wind tunnel assessments of the implications of respacing and thinning for tree stability. Forestry. 1997; 70:233–52.
Glitzenstein JS, Harcombe PA. Effects of the December 1983 tornado on forest vegetation of the Big Thicket, southeast Texas. USA Forest Ecol Manag. 1988; 25:269–90.
Green SR, Grace J, Hutchings NJ. Observations of turbulent air flow in three stands of widely spaced Sitka spruce. Agric For Meteorol. 1995;74:205–25.
Gresham CA, Williams TM, Lipscomb DJ. Hurricane Hugo wind damage to southeastern U.S. coastal forest tree species. Biotropica. 1991;23:420–6.
Grime JP. Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2001.
Haase P. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: introduction and methods of edge correction. J Veg Sci. 1995;6:575–82.
Hale SE, Gardiner BA, Wellpott A, Nicoll BC, Achim A. Wind loading of trees: influence of tree size and competition. Eur J For Res. 2012;131:203–17.
Harcombe PA, Leipzig LEM, Elsik IS. Effects of Hurricane Rita on three long-term forest study plots in east Texas, USA. Wetlands. 2009;29:88–100.
Kim D, Campbell JJN. Effects of tree size, shade-tolerance, and spatial pattern on the mortality of woody plants in a semi-natural urban woodlot, central Kentucky, USA. Prof Geogr. 2016;68:436–50.
Kooch Y, Hosseini SM, Šamonil P, Hojjati SM. The effect of windthrow disturbances on biochemical and chemical soil properties in the northern mountainous forests of Iran. Catena. 2014;116:142–8.
Lafon CW. Forest disturbance by ice storms in Quercus forests of the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Écoscience. 2006;13:30–43.
Long JN. Emulating natural disturbance regimes as a basis for forest management: a North American view. Forest Ecol Manag. 2009;257:1868–73.
Marks PL, Harcombe PA. Forest vegetation of the Big Thicket, southeast Texas. Ecol Monogr. 1981;51:287–305.
Mason WL. Are irregular stands more windfirm? Forestry. 2002;75:347–55.
Milne R. Modelling mechanical stresses in living Sitka spruce stems. In: Coutts MP, Grace J, editors. Wind and trees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 165–81.
Mitchell SJ. Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis. Forestry. 2013;86:147–57.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Data tools: 1981–2010 Normal. [https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datatools/normals] Accessed 27 Sept 2017.
Oliver WW. Twenty-five-year growth and mortality of planted ponderosa pine repeatedly thinned to different stand densities in northern California. West J Appl For. 1997;12:122–30.
Peltola H, Kellomäki S. A mechanistic model for calculating windthrow and stem breakage of Scots pines at stand edge. Silva Fenn. 1993;27:99–111.
Peterson CJ. Damage and recovery of tree species after two different tornadoes in the same old growth forest: a comparison of infrequent wind disturbances. Forest Ecol Manag. 2000;135:237–52.
Pinkard EA, Neilsen WA. Crown and stand characteristics of Eucalyptus nitens in response to initial spacing: implications for thinning. Forest Ecol Manag. 2003;172:215–27.
Reukema DL. Forty-year development of Douglas-fir stands planted at various spacings. In: USDA Forest Service Research Paper. PNW-100; 1970. p. 21.
Reukema DL. Fifty-year development of Douglas-fir stands planted at various spacings. In: USDA Forest Service Research Paper. PNW-253; 1979. p. 21.
Rich RL, Frelich LE, Reich PB. Wind-throw mortality in the southern boreal forest: effects of species, diameter and stand age. J Ecol. 2007;95:1261–73.
Ruck B, Frank C, Tischmacher M. On the influence of windward edge structure and stand density on the flow characteristics at forest edges. Eur J For Res. 2012;131:177–89.
Santos LT, Marra DM, Trumbore S, de Camargo PB, Negrón-Juárez RI, Lima AJN, Ribeiro GHPM, Santos J, Higuchi N. Windthrows increase soil carbon stocks in a central Amazon forest. Biogeosciences. 2016;13:1299–308.
Schindler D, Bauhus J, Mayer H. Wind effects on trees. Eur J For Res. 2012;131: 159–63.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. New York: W H Freeman; 1995.
Stearns SC. The evolution of life histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
Ulanova NG. The effects of windthrow on forests at different spatial scales: a review. Forest Ecol Manag. 2000;135:155–67.
Uriarte M, Papaik M. Hurricane impacts on dynamics, structure and carbon sequestration potential of forest ecosystems in southern New England, USA. Tellus A. 2007;59:519–28.
Valinger E, Fridman J. Modelling probability of snow and wind damage in Scots pine stands using tree characteristics. Forest Ecol Manag. 1997;97:215–22.
Valladares F, Niinemets Ü. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 2008;39:237–57.
Webb SL. Windstorm damage and microsite colonization in two Minnesota forests. Can J For Res. 1988;18:1186–95.
Webb SL. Contrasting windstorm consequences in two forests, Itasca State Park, Minnesota. Ecology. 1989;70:1167–80.
Wiegand T, Moloney KA. Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos. 2004;104:209–29.
Wiegand T, Moloney KA. Handbook of spatial point pattern analysis in ecology. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC press; 2013.
Wolf A, Møller PF, Bradshaw RHW, Bigler J. Storm damage and long-term mortality in a semi-natural, temperate deciduous forest. Forest Ecol Manag. 2004;188:197–210.
Wonn HT, O’Hara KL. Height:diameter ratios and stability relationships for four northern Rocky Mountain tree species. West J Appl For. 2001;16:87–94.
Xi W, Peet RK. The complexity of catastrophic wind impacts on temperate forests. In: Lupo A, editor. Recent hurricane research – climate, dynamics, and societal impacts. Shanghai: InTech; 2011. p. 503–34.
Xi W, Peet RK, Decoster JK, Urban DL. Tree damage risk factors associated with large, infrequent wind disturbances of Carolina forests. Forestry. 2008;81:317–34.
Zeng H, Peltola H, Talkkari A, Venäläinen A, Strandman H, Kellomäki S, Wang K. Influence of clear-cutting on the risk of wind damage at forest edges. Forest Ecol Manag. 2004;203:77–88.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations