바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

Impact, management, and use of invasive alien plant species in Nepal’s protected area: a systematic review

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2024, v.48 no.2, pp.182-195
https://doi.org/10.5141/jee.23.081
Sunita Dhungana (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, ThailandDepartment of Forest Products and Engineering, Institute of Forestry, Pokhara Campus, Tribhuvan University, Pokhara 33700, Nepal)
Nuttaya Yuangyai (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)
Sutinee Sinutok (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, ThailandCoastal Oceanography and Climate Change Research Center, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Background: Invasive alien plant species (IAP) significantly threaten Nepal’s protected areas and local communities. Understanding their distribution, impact, management, and utilization is essential for developing effective management strategies and sustainable uti- lization practices. The systematic literature review of publications from 2010 to 2023. The search was conducted through the database Nepal Journal online database (NepJOL) and Google Scholar, yielding an initial pool of 4,304 publication. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria; we meticulously reviewed 43 articles for data extraction. Results: Seventeen IAP are found in protected area, Nepal with the highest prevalence observed in Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, followed by Chitwan and Sukhlaphanta National Park. The most problematic species in terrestrial ecosystems are Mikania micrantha, Lan- tana camara, and Chromolaena odorata. The grassland ecosystems of wildlife habitats, primarily in the Terai and Siwalik regions, are the most invaded. Various management ap- proaches are employed to mitigate the spread and impact of IAP, including mechanical methods such as uprooting, burning, and cutting. However, these methods are costly, and context-specific interventions are needed. The study also explores the potential use of IAP for economic, ecological, or cultural purposes, such as medicinal properties, energy production potential, and economic viability. Local communities utilize these plants for animal bedding, mulching, green manure, briquette, and charcoal production. Conclusions: Applying silvicultural practices alongside mechanical management is rec- ommended to maintain a healthy terrestrial ecosystem and utilize the removed biomass for valuable products, thereby reducing removal costs and increasing income sources, po- tentially benefitting both local communities and wildlife in protected areas.

keywords
invasive alien plant species, native species, protected area, wildlife habitat

Journal of Ecology and Environment