바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Automatic Thoughts of Test Questionnaire: Development and Psychometric Properties

Abstract

Based on the cognitive approach to test anxiety, we conducted two studies in order to develop the Automatic Thoughts of Test Questionnaire (ATTQ) to assess cognitive content associated with test anxiety and to examine its psychometric properties. In Study 1, 95 preliminary items were initially drawn from automatic thoughts collected with the thought-listing method, as well as from existing scales of test anxiety, and then 37 items were selected through an examination of content validity. The preliminary 37-item version of the ATTQ was administered to 223 undergraduate students during an actual test. The final version of the ATTQ consisted of 21 items that were selected using a series of exploratory factor analyses. Factor analyses of the ATTQ revealed a five-factor structure: ‘Negative Prediction of Test Scores’, ‘Catastrophic Interpretation of Test Results’, ‘Concerns about Others’ Negative Evaluation’, ‘Worry about Unexpected Questions on an Exam’, and ‘Fear of Having One's Mind Go Blank’. Study 2 aimed to replicate the initial factor structure found in Study 1 and to examine the reliability and validity of the ATTQ in a sample of 292 undergraduate students. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the correlated five-factor model had a better goodness-of-fit than other models. The ATTQ showed high internal consistency, acceptable test-retest reliability over a five-week period, and good convergent, criterion, and incremental validity. Consistent with the cognitive model of test anxiety, automatic thoughts as measured by the ATTQ partially mediated the association between cognitive test anxiety and state anxiety during an actual test, thus providing support for its construct validity. In conclusion, these findings suggest that the ATTQ is a highly reliable and valid instrument for assessing the automatic thoughts associated with test anxiety in undergraduate students. Finally, the theoretical and clinical implications as well as the limitations of the present research were discussed.

keywords
automatic thoughts, test anxiety, psychometric properties, factor structure, cognitive theory, 자동적 사고, 시험불안, 심리측정적 속성, 요인구조, 인지이론

Reference

1.

강병식 (2000). 특성 시험불안과 평가시기에 따른 시험에 대한 통제감과 시험 대처행동의 차이. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

2.

권석만 (1996). 우울과 불안의 관계: 유발 생활사건과 인지내용에 있어서의 공통점과 차이점. 심리과학, 5, 13-38.

3.

김문주 (1991). 우리나라 학생들의 시험불안 진단을 위한 도구 개발 과정. 소아․청소년정신의학, 2(1), 32-42.

4.

김성희 (2003). 특성불안, 통제소재, 자기효능감이 시험불안에 미치는 영향. 충남대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

5.

김혜진 (2000). 내․외 통제소재가 아동의 시험불안 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향. 서울교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문.

6.

문성원, 한종철 (1996). 스트레스에 대한 인지적 평가와 지각된 사회적 지지가 청소년의 대처행동에 미치는 영향. 소아․청소년 정신의학, 7, 233-246.

7.

박순환. (1986). 시험불안, 성공-실패 경험 및 자기지향적 주의가 과제수행에 미치는 효고. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.

8.

원호택, 이민규 (1987). 고등학교 재학생들의 스트레스. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 6, 22-32.

9.

이주영, 김지혜 (2002). 긍정적 사고의 평가와 활용: 한국판 긍정적 자동적 사고 질문지의 표준화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 21, 647-664.

10.

임지연, 이영호, 최영안 (2004). 역기능적 신념 및 부정적인 자동적 사고와 사회적 자기 효능감이 발표불안에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23, 595-609.

11.

장형석 (2000). 대학생들의 스트레스 원천과 대처전략. 부산대학교 학생생활연구소, 32, 101-115.

12.

조용래 (1999). 역기능적 신념과 사회공포증상간의 관계에서 부적응적인 자동적 사고의 매개효과 검증: 구조방정식모델 접근법을 사용하여. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 18, 17- 36.

13.

조용래 (2000). 발표불안에 대한 인지적 평가: 자동적 사고 질문지의 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19, 831-851.

14.

조용래 (2004). 한국판 발표불안 사고 검사의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23, 1109-1124.

15.

조용래 (2008a). 시험불안에서 상위인지의 역할: 우울수준, 실수에 대한 완벽주의적 염려, 학습기술 및 학업적 자기 효능감의 영향을 넘어서. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 27, 709-727.

16.

조용래 (2008b). 걱정의 통제 불능성/위험에 대한 부정적 신념과 시험불안의 관계: 경험 회피의 매개역할. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 27, 891-909.

17.

조용래 (2011). 한국판 개정된 시험불안척도에 대한 확인적 요인분석. 인지행동치료, 11, 99-109.

18.

채숙희, 오수성, 조용래 (2000). 완벽주의 성향과 주의 방향이 수행불안에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19, 231-246.

19.

표경식, 조용래, 이무석, 김학렬, 박상학, 김상훈 (1998). 성취관련 자기 불일치와 평가위협 스트레스가 수행불안에 미치는 효과. 신경정신의학, 37, 1174-1185.

20.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19, 161-178.

21.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173- 1182.

22.

Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: New American Library.

23.

Beck, A. T., Brown, G., Steer, R. A., Eidelson, J. L., & Riskind, J. H. (1987). Differentiating anxiety and depression: A test of the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 179-183.

24.

Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. L. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias. New York: Basic Books.

25.

Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York: Guilford Press.

26.

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.

27.

Blankstein, K. R., Flett, G. L., Boase, P., & Toner. B. B. (1989). Thoughts listing and endorsement measures of self-referential thinking in test anxiety. Anxiety Research, 2, 133-142.

28.

Blankstein, K. R., Toner, B. B., & Flett, G. L. (1989). Test anxiety and the contents of consciousness: Thoughts listing and endorsement measures. Journal of the Research in Personality, 23, 269-286.

29.

Bruch, M. A., Kaflowitz, N. G., & Kuethe, M. (1986). Beliefs and the subjective meaning of thoughts: Analysis of the role of self-statements in academic test performance. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 51-69.

30.

Cassady, J. C. (2004). The influence of cognitive test anxiety across the learning-testing cycle. Learning and Instruction, 14, 569-592.

31.

Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270- 295.

32.

Cho, Y., Smits, J. A., & Telch, M. J. (2004). The Speech Anxiety Thoughts Inventory: Scale development and preliminary psychometric data. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 13- 25.

33.

Cho, Y., & Telch, M. J. (2005). Testing the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis of social anxiety and depression: An application of structural equation modeling. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 399-416.

34.

Clark, D. A. (1988). The validity of measures of cognition: A review of the literature. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12, 1-20.

35.

Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (1989). Cognitive theory and therapy of anxiety and depression. In P. C. Kendall & D. Watson(Eds.), Anxiety and depression: Distinctive and overlapping features(pp.379-411). San Diego: Academic Press.

36.

Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1981). As failure mount: Affective and cognitive consequences of ability demotion in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 796-808.

37.

de Bruin, G. O., Rassin, E., & Muris, P. (2007). The Prediction of worry in non-clinical individuals: The role of intolerance of uncertainty, meta-worry, and neuroticism. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 93-100.

38.

Flaxman, P. L., Bond, F. W., & Keogh, E. (2002). Handbook of brief cognitive behaviour therapy, John Wiley & Sons.

39.

Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in development and refinement of clinical assessments instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.

40.

Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 20-35.

41.

Greenberg, M. S., & Beck, A. T. (1989). Depression and anxiety: A test of the content-specificity hypothesis, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 9-13.

42.

Heimberg, R. G., Nyman. M., & O' Brien, G. T. (1987). Assessing variations of the thought-listing technique: effects of instructions, stimulus intensity, stimulus modality, and scoring procedures. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 13-24.

43.

Hunsley, J. (1987). Internal dialogue during academic examinations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 653-664.

44.

Ingram, R. E., & Kendall, P. C. (1987). The cognitive side of anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 523-536.

45.

Ingram, R. E., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Assessment of positive automatic cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 898-902.

46.

Kendall, P. C., & Chansky, T. (1991). Considering cognition in anxiety disorders children. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 5, 167-185.

47.

Kendall, P. C., & Hollon, S. D. (1981). Assessing self-referent speech: Method in measurement of self-statements. In P. C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon(Eds), Assessment strategies for cognitive-behaviroal interventions(pp.85-118). New York: Academic Press.

48.

King, N. J., Mietz, A., Tinney, L. A., & Ollendick, T. H. (1995). Psychopathology and cognition in adolescents experiencing severe test anxiety. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24, 49-54.

49.

Meichenbaum, D., & Butler, L. (1980). Toward a conceptual model for treatment of test anxiety: Implications for research and treatment. In I. G. Sarason(Ed), Test anxiety; Theory, research and applications(pp.187-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

50.

Morris, L. W., & Liebert, R. M. (1970). Relationship of cognitive and emotional components of test anxiety to physiological arousal and academic performance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 332-337.

51.

Ramirez, G., & Beilock, S. L. (2011). Writing about testing worries boosts exam performance in the classroom. Science, 331, 211-213.

52.

Sarason, I. G. (1972). Test anxiety and the model who fails. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 410-413.

53.

Sarason, I. G. (1980). Test Anxiety: Theory, research and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

54.

Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929-938.

55.

Wine, J. D. (1971). Test anxiety and the direction of attention. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 92-104.

56.

Wine, J. D. (1980). Cognitive-attentional theory of test-anxiety. In I. G. Sarason(Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research and applications (pp.349-385). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

logo