open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
E-ISSN : 2733-4538
위험추구 행동은 정서적인 Hot 시스템과 인지적인 Cool 시스템의 불균형에 의해 발생할 수 있는데, 이 불균형은 양가감정과 메타인지 수준을 통해 알 수 있다. 본 연구는 양가감정과 메타인지가 위험추구 행동으로써의 음주 행동에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 수행되었다. 대학생 206명에게 양가감정과 메타인지를 기준으로 군집분석을 실시한 결과, 네 개의 구분되는 군집이 발견되었다. 군집 1은 두 변인의 수준이 모두 높고, 군집 2는 양가감정은 낮지만, 메타인지 수준은 높고, 군집 3은 두 변인의 수준이 모두 낮으며, 군집 4는 양가감정 수준은 높지만 메타인지 수준이 낮았다. 군집 간 음주 행동의 차이를 분석한 결과, 군집 1은 다른 군집에 비해 음주 빈도와 음주량이 적고, 음주에 대한 강박적 갈망 수준도 낮으며, 현재 건강한 음주를 위해 자신의 음주를 조절하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 상관분석 결과, 양가감정과 메타인지는 모두 음주 행동과 관련이 있었지만, 특히 양가감정이 음주 빈도, 음주량, 변화동기와 더 높은 관련성이 있음을 확인하였다. 이러한 결과는 Hot 시스템과 Cool 시스템 간의 균형을 유지하는 것이 건강한 음주를 위해 중요함을 시사하므로, 음주 문제의 해결을 위해 두 시스템의 균형을 지속적으로 파악하는 것이 필요하다.
Risk-taking behaviors result from the imbalance between affective Hot system and rational Cool system. This imbalance is affected by ambivalence and metacognition. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of ambivalence and metacognition on drinking behaviors as risk-taking behaviors. In order to create naturalistic groups based on actual data, we used cluster analysis. A four-cluster solution was selected for representation of data. Cluster 1 represented high ambivalence and high metacognition, Cluster 2 represented low ambivalence and high metacognition, Cluster 3 represented low ambivalence and low metacognition, and Cluster 4 represented high ambivalence and low metacognition. In addition, the analysis examined differences in alcohol use within groups. Cluster 1 had a lower frequency of drinking, a smaller amount of drinking, a lower level of obsessive alcohol thought, and a superior stage of change, compared with the other clusters. Results of correlation analyses indicated that both ambivalence and metacognition were related to drinking behaviors. These results suggest that the balance between Hot system and Cool system is essential for healthy drinking. Therefore, understanding the balance between the systems may be needed in order to resolve drinking problems.
김용석 (2000). 대처수단으로서의 음주동기와 음주행위, 음주문제 간의 관계. 정신보건과 사회사업, 9, 5-22.
김종성, 오미경, 박병강, 이민규, 김갑중, 오장균 (1999). 한국에서 Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test(AUDIT)를 통한 알코올리즘의 선별기준. 가정의학회지, 20, 1152- 1159.
이덕기, 신진규, 정영인 (2000). 알코올 사용 척도에 의한 알코올 의존의 유형과 그 특성에 관한 연구. 대한신경정신의학회, 39, 1132-1142.
이새롬, 이장한 (2012). 한국판 음주 접근․회피 질문지의 타당화 연구. 한국임상심리학회 봄 학술대회 발표 초록집, pp.187-188. 4월 27일. 춘천: 한림대학교.
전영민 (2005). 알코올 의존자의 변화동기 평가: 변화단계척도(SOCRATES) 개발연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 24, 207-223.
주소연 (2005). 비구조적 문제해결(Ⅲ- structured problem solving)에서 질문 프롬프트에 의한 비계설정(scaffolding)이 학습자의 메타인지, 학습동기, 참여도, 문제해결력에 미치는 효과. 이화여자대학교 석사학위 논문.
최문종, 이 은, 이병욱, 이필구, 오병훈, 이충헌, 남궁기 (2002). 한국어판 강박음주갈망척도의 표준화 연구. 대한신경정신의학, 41, 98-109.
Anton, R. F., Moak, D. H., & Latham, P. K. (1996). The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS). Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 225-231.
Ayduk, O., Mischel, W., & Downey, G. (2002). Attentional mechanisms linking rejection to hostile reactivity: The role of “hot” versus “cool” focus. Psychological Science, 13, 443-448.
Baker, T. B., Piper, M. E., McCarthy, D. E., Majeskie, M. R., & Fiore, M. C. (2004). Addiction motivation reformulated: An affective processing model of negative reinforcement. Psychological Review, 111, 33-51.
Barkby, H., Dickson, J. M., Roper, L., & Field, M. (2012). To approach or avoid alcohol? Automatic and self-reported motivational tendencies in alcohol dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 361-368.
Bechara, A. (2005). Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1458-1463.
Blashfield, R. K., & Aldenderfer, M. S. (1978). The literature on cluster analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13, 271-295.
Breiner, M. J., Stritzke, W. G. K., & Lang, A. R. (1999). Approaching avoidance: A step essential to the understanding of craving. Alcohol Research and Health, 23, 197-206.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp.77-165). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, 1789-1795.
Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 28, 62-77.
Casey, B. J., & Jones, R. M. (2010). Neurobiology of the adolescent brain and behavior: Implications for substance use disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 1189-1201.
Cherpitel, C. J. (1993). Alcohol and injuries: A review of international emergency room studies. Addiction, 88, 923-937.
Clark, N., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). A social cognitive view of self-regulated learning about health. Health Education Research, 5, 371-379.
de Liver, Y., van der Pligt, J., & Wigboldus, D. (2007). Positive and negative associations underlying ambivalent attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 319-326.
de Visser, R. O., & Smith, J. A. (2007). Young men’s ambivalence toward alcohol. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 350-362.
Emmons, R. A. (1996). Strivings and feeling: Personal goals and subjective well-being. In P. M. Gollwitzer, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp.313-337). New York: Guilford.
Ersche, K. D., Jones, P. J., Williams, G. B., Turton, A. J., Robbins, T. W., & Bullmore, E. T. (2012). Abnormal brain structure implicated in stimulant drug addiction. Science, 335, 601-604.
Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2005). Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: From actions to habits to compulsion. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1481-1489.
Figner, B., & Voelki, N. (2004). Risky decision making in a computer card game: An information integration experiment. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 135-139.
Frankel, A. (1976). Subjective responses to alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages by alcoholic respondents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 14, 73-76.
Fromme, K., Katz, E., & D'Amico, E. (1997). Effects of alcohol intoxication on the perceived consequences of risk taking. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5, 14-23.
Fromme, K., Katz, E. C., & Rivet, K. (1997). Outcome expectancies and risk-taking behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 421-442.
Gladwin, T. E., Figner, B., Crone, E. A., & Wiers, R. W. (2011). Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 364-376.
Goudriaan, A. E., Grekin, E. R., & Sher, K. J. (2007). Decision making and binge drinking: A longitudinal study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31, 928-938.
Grant, S., Contoreggi, C., & London, E. D. (2000). Drug abusers show impaired performance in a laboratory test of decision making. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1180-1187.
Griffin, K. M., & Sayatte, M. A. (2008). Facial reactions to smoking cues relate to ambivalence about smoking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22, 551-556.
Heather, N. (1998). A conceptual framework for explaining drug addiction. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 12, 3-7.
Henry, K. L., Slater, M. D., & Oetting, E. R. (2005). Alcohol use in early adolescence: The effect of changes in perceived harm and friends’ alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66, 275-283.
Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence- indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Review, 77, 361-372.
Klaczynski, P. (2004). A dual-process model of adolescent development: Implications for decision making, reasoning, and identity. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp.73-123). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Klein, A. A., Stasiewizc, P. R., Koutsky, J. R., Bradizza, C. M,, & Coffey, S. F. (2007). A psychometric evaluation of the Approach and Avoidance of Alcohol Questionnaire (AAAQ) in alcohol dependent outpatients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 231-240.
Kuther, T. L. (2002). Rational decision perspectives on alcohol consumption by youth. Revising the theory of planned behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 35-47.
Lipkus, I. M., Green, J. D., Feaganes, J. R., & Sedikides, C. (2001). The relationship between attitudinal ambivalence and desire to quit smoking among college smokers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 113-133.
McEvoy, P. M., Stritzke, W. G. K., French, D. J., Lang, A. R., & Ketterman, R. L. (2004). Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: A cross validation. Addiction, 99, 482-497.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A Hot/Cool- system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3-19.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2004). Talking oneself into change: Motivational interviewing, stages of change, and therapeutic process. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 18, 299-308.
Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1996). Assessing drinker's motivation for change: The Stage of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 10, 81-89.
Mischel, W., Cantor, N., & Feldman, S. (1996). Principles of self-regulation: The nature of willpower and self-control. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp.329-360). New York: Guilford Press.
Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
O’Neil, H. E., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 234-245.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, 161-173.
Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., Yeadon, C., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (2004). A dual-process model of reactions to perceived stigma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 436-452.
Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2003). Addiction. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 25- 53.
Rubak, S., & Sandbaek, A. (2005). Motivational interviewing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The British Journal of General Practice, 55, 305-312.
Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption II. Addiction, 88, 791-804.
Shaffer, H. J., & Simoneau, G. (2001). Reducing resistance and denial by exercising ambivalence during the treatment of addiction. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20, 99-105.
Spada, M. M., & Wells, A. (2005). Metacognitions, emotion and alcohol use. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 150-155.
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220- 247.
Stritzke, W. G. K., McEvoy, P. M., Wheat, L. R., Dyer, K. R., & French, D. J. (2007). The yin and yang of indulgence and restraint: The ambivalence model of craving. In P. W. O'Neal (Ed.), Motivation of health behavior (pp. 31-47). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Tapert, S. F., Schweinsburg, A. D., Barlett, V. C., Brown, S. A., Frank, L. R., Brown, G. G., & Meloy, M. J. (2004). Blood oxygen level dependent response and spatial working memory in adolescents with alcohol use disorders. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 28, 1577-1586.
Toneatto, T. (1999). Metacognition and substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 24, 167-174.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Maton, K. I. (1992). Life- style and substance use among male african- american urban adolescents: A cluster analytic approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 121-138.
