바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Role of Prefactual Thinking and Anticipated Regret in Consumer Decision-Making: Moderating of Need for Closure and Optimism-Pessimism

Abstract

Recently there has been a growing attention to the cognitive process of counterfactual thinking and the emotion of regret in consumer decision-making. Research has reported that decisions to maintain the status quo tend to make experience in counterfactual thinking and regret less than decisions to change. However, the study examined the influence of anticipated counterfactual thinking(i.e., prefactual thinking) and regret on status quo effect toward the upcoming outcome instead of counterfactual thinking and regret toward the past outcome. In addition, following research about individual differences on decision-making, the study explored whether need for closure and optimism-pessimism in deciding decision moderate the extent of prefactual thinking and regret. The results support the hypothesized interactive effect of need for closure by type of alternative(status-quo vs. non-status-quo) on prefactual thinking and anticipated regret, and the hypothesized interactive effect of need for closure by optimism-pessimism on regret. However, there is no the interactive effect of type of alternative by optimism- pessimism on both prefactual thinking and anticipated regret. Theoretical and practical implications for control of impulse buying discussed based on the results.

keywords
Prefactual Thinking, Anticipated Regret, Need for Closure, Optimism-Pessimism

Reference

1.

Aspinwall, L. & Burnhart, S. (1996). Distinguishing Optimism from Denial: Optimistic Beliefs Predict Attention to Health Threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 993-1003.

2.

Buchanan, G. M. & Seligman, M E. P.(Eds.). (1995). Explanatory Style. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

3.

Chiu, C. Y., Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. Y., Menon. T. (2000). Motivated Cultural Cognition: The Impact of Implicit Cultural Theories on Dispositional Attribution Varies as a Function of Need for Closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 247-259.

4.

Cooke, A. D., Meyvis, T., & Schwartz, A. (2001). Avoiding Future Regret in Purchase-Timing Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 447-459.

5.

Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., Strathman, A., Armor, D., Hetts, J., & Ahn, M. (1995). With an Eye toward the Future: The Impact of Conterfactual Thinking on Affect, Attitudes, and Behavior. In Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M.(Eds.), What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, 283-304, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

6.

Geers, A. L., Handley, I. M., & McLarney, A. R.(2003). Discerning the Role of Optimism in Persuasion: The Valence-Enhancement Hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 554-565.

7.

Gleicher, F., Kost, K. A., Baker, S. M., Strathman, A. J., Richman, S. A., & Sherman, S. J. (1990). The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Judgments of Affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 284-295.

8.

Goerke, M., Möller, J., Schulz-Hardt, S., Napiersky, U., & Frey, D. (2004). “It's Not My Fault-But Only I Can Change It”: Counterfactual and Prefactual Thoughts of Managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 279-292.

9.

Hetts, J. J., Boninger, D. S., Armor, D. A., Gleicher, F., & Nathanson, A. (2000). The Influence of Anticipated Counterfactual Regret on Behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 345-368.

10.

Inman, J. J. & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in Repeat Purchase versus Switching Decisions: The Attenuating Role of Decision Justifiability. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 116-128.

11.

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375.

12.

Kahneman, D. & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.

13.

Kasimatis, M. & Wells, G. L. (1995). Individual Differences in Counterfactual Thinking. In Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M(Eds.), What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, 81-102, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Klein, C. T. F. & Webster, D. M. (2000). Individual Differences in Argument Scrutiny as Motivated by Need for Cognitive Closure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 119-129.

15.

Kruglanski, A. W. & Freund, T. (1983). The Freezing and Unfreezing of Lay Inferences: Effects of Impressional Primacy, Ethnic Stereotyping, and Numerical Anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.

16.

Kruglanski, A. W. & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated Closing of the Mind: "Seizing" and “Freezing”. Psychological Review, 103(2), 263- 283.

17.

Kruglanski, A. W. (1990). Lay Epistemics Theory in Social Cognitive Psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 1(3), 181-197.

18.

Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated Resistance and Openness to Persuasion in the Presence or Absence of Prior Information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861-876.

19.

Landman, J. (1987). regret and Elation Following Action and Inaction: Affective Responses to Positive versus negative Outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536.

20.

Lovelock, C. H. (1983). Classifying Services to Gain Strategic Marketing Insights. Journal of Marketing, 47(Summer), 9-20.

21.

Maier, S. F. & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Learned Helplessness: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3-46.

22.

McConnell, A. R., Bill, C. M., Dember, W. N., & Grasha, A. F. (1993). Personality through Metaphor: Optimism, Pessimism, Locus of Control and Sensation Seeking. Current Psychology, 12(3), 195-210.

23.

McConnell, A. R., Niedermeier, K. E., Leibold, J. M., El-Alayli, A. G., Chin, P. P., & Kuiper, N. M. (2000). What If I Find It Cheaper Someplace Else? Role of Prefactual Thinking and Anticipated Regret in Consumer Behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 17(4), 281-298.

24.

Medvec, V. H. & Savitsky, K. (1997). When Doing Better Means Feeling Worse: The Effects of Categorical Cutoff Points on Counterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1284-1296.

25.

Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the ‘Side-Bet Theory’ of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372-378.

26.

Miller, D. t. & Taylor, B. R. (1995). Counterfactual Thought, Regret, and Superstition: How to Avoid Kicking Yourself. In Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M(Eds.), What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, 305-331, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

27.

N'gbala, A. & Branscombe, N. R. (1997). When Does Action Elicit More Regret Than Inaction and Is Counterfactual Mutation the Mediator of This Effect? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 324-343.

28.

Nordgren, L. F., van der Pligt, J., & van Harreveld, F. (2007). Unpacking Perceived Control in Risk Perception: The Mediating Role of Anticipated Regret. Journal of Behavioral Decsion Making, 20, 533-544.

29.

Peterson, C. (2000). The Future of Optimism. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44-55.

30.

Roese, N. J. & Hur, T. (1997). Affective Determinants of Counterfactual Thinking. Social Cognition, 15, 333-350.

31.

Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M. (1995). Counterfactual Thinking: A Critical Overview. In Roese, N. J. & Olson, J. M(Eds.), What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking, 1-55, Hillside, NJ: Erlbarum.

32.

Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual Thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.

33.

Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Omission and Commision in Judgment and Choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76-105.

34.

Scheier, M. F. & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, Coping, and Health: Assessment and Implications of Generalized Outcome Expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219-247.

35.

Scheier, M. F. & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of Optimism on Psychological and Physical Well-Being: Theoretical Overview and Empirical Update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 201-228.

36.

Segerstrom, S. C. (2001). Optimism and Attentional Bias for Negative and Positive Stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1334-1343.

37.

Seligman, M. E. P. (1990). Learned Optimism. NY: Knopf.

38.

Simonson, J. (1992). The Influence of Anticipating Regret and Responsibility on Purchase Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105-118.

39.

Tiger, L. (1979). Optimism: The Biology of Hope. NY: Simon & Schuster.

40.

Tsiros, M. & Mittal, V. (2000). Regret: A Model of Its Antecedents and Consequences in Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(March), 401-417.

41.

Tykocinski, O. E. & Pttman, T. S. (1998). The Consequence of Doing Nothing: Inaction Inertia as Avoidance of Anticipated Counterfactual Regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 607-616.

42.

Tykocinski, O. E. & Pttman, T. S. (2001). Product Aversion Following a Missed Opportunity: Price Contrast or Avoidance of Anticipated Regret? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 149-156.

43.

Tykocinski, O. E., Pttman, T. S., & Tuttle, E. E. (1995). Inaction Inertia: Foregoing Future Benefits as a Result of an Initial Failure to Act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 793-803.

44.

Weiner, B. (1980). A Cognitive (Attribution)- Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 186-200.

45.

Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated Regret, Expected Feedback and Behavioral Decison Making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12(2), 93-106.

46.

Zeelenberg, M., van den Bos, K., van Dijk, E., & Pieters, R. (2002). The Inaction Effect in the Psychology of Regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 314-327.

47.

Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., van der Pligt, J., Manstead, S. R., van Empelen, P., & Reinderman, D. (1998). Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 117-141.

logo