바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Effect of Brand Extension Similarity, Extension Product Price and Perceived Risk on Extension Product Evaluation

Abstract

This research was conducted to investigate the effect of extension similarity, the price of extension product and perceived risk on extension evaluation and purchase intension. Main interest of this research was to clarify the role of perceived risk. That is, how perceived risk moderate the effect of extension similarity and the price of extension product. Extension similarity(2) X price(2) X perceived risk(2) between subjects factorial design was employed. Results supported research hypotheses. In case of high similarity and high perceived risk condition, high priced extension product was preferred to low priced extension product and purchase intension was significantly high. The results reveal that the price preference caused by perceived risk can be generalized to the situation of brand extension. Research limitations and implications of future research were discussed.

keywords
brand extension, extension similarity, perceived risk, extension price, extension evaluation

Reference

1.

고성현, 여준상, 김영조, 김재영 (2007). 모브랜드-확장제품간 유사성이 브랜드 확장 평가에 영향을 미치는데 있어 BRQ의 조절효과. 경영연구, 22(4), 231-248.

2.

금영숙 (1987). 제품에 대한 위험 지각에 따른 준거집단의 영향에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교 대학원.

3.

김경민, 나준희 (2006). 모 브랜드에 대한 지식이 브랜드 확장에 대한 평가에 미치는 영향. 소비문화연구, 9(1), 45-60.

4.

나윤규, 홍병숙 (2008). 인터넷 쇼핑에서의 지각된 위험과 신뢰가 지각된 유용성, 태도 및 패션상품 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 32(5), 834-845.

5.

도선재, 전주언, 문영준 (2009). 브랜드확장의 적합성에 따른 시간적 거리의 제시 효과: 브랜드 컨셉과 브랜드 친숙성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 10(1), 79- 99.

6.

이종헌 (1997). 구매목적에 따른 소비 행동의 차이: 자기사용구매와 선물구매를 중심으로. 석사학위 논문. 고려대학교 대학원.

7.

안광호, 한상만 (2008). 전략적 브랜드 관리 이론과 응용(3판). 서울: 학현사.

8.

전성률 (2005). 브랜드 확장 제품에 대한 소비자의 기대가격 형성에 관한 연구. 마케팅연구, 20(1), 91-110.

9.

홍성태, 강동균 (1997). 유사성, 지각된 품질 및 기업의 신뢰도가 상표확장제품평가에 미치는 영, 마케팅연구, 12(1), 1-25.

10.

황병일 (1989). 상황이 소비자 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 과업상황을 중심으로. 박사학위 논문. 중앙대학교 대학원.

11.

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New york: Free press.

12.

Aaker, D. A. & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extension. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27-41.

13.

Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W. & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 386-400.

14.

Belk, R. W. (1979). Gift-giving behavior. Research in Marketing, 3(3), 427-437.

15.

Bettman, J. R. (1973). Perceived risk and it's components: A model and empirical test. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 184-90.

16.

Boush, D. M. & Loken, B. (1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 16-28.

17.

Bridges, S., Keller, K. L. & Sood, S. (2000). Communication strategies for brand extensions: Enhancing perceived fit by establishing explanatory links. Journal of Advertising, 29, 1-11.

18.

Broniarczyk, S. M. & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214-229.

19.

Campbell, M. C. & Goodstein, R. C. (2001). The moderating effect of perceived risk on consumer's evaluations of product incongruity: Preference for the norm. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 439-449.

20.

Dowling (1999). Perceivd risk. In P. E. Earl & S. K. Cheltenham (Eds), The elgar companion to consumer research and economic psychology. UK: Edward elgar, 419-424.

21.

Dowling, G. R. & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 119-134.

22.

Erdem, T. (1998). An empirical analysis of umbrella branding. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 339-351.

23.

Folkes, V. S. (1988). The availability heuristic and perceived risk. Journal of ConsumerRsearch, 15(1), 13-23.

24.

Jacoby, J. & Kaplan, L. (1972). The components of perceived risk. Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 382-38

25.

Kapferer, J. N. (2004). The new strategic brand management. London: Kogan page.

26.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity, Journal of Marketing, 57, 1-22.

27.

Kirmani, A. & Zeithaml, V. (1993). Advertising perceived quality and brand image, Brand Equity and Advertising, 213-231.

28.

Maoz, E. & Tybout, A. M. (2002). The moderating role of involvement and differentiation in the evaluation of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 119-131.

29.

Muthukrishnan. A. V. & Weitz, B. A. (1991). Role of product knowledge in evaluation of brand extension. Advances in Consumer Researpch, 18, 407-413.

30.

Park, C. W., Milberg S. & Lawson R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extension: The role of product level similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 185-193.

31.

Park, J. W. & Kim, K. H. (2001). Role of consumer relationships with a brand in brand extensions: Some exploratory findings. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 179-185.

32.

Smith , D. C. & Park, C. W. (1992). The effects of brand extension on market share andadvertising efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 296-313.

33.

Solomon, M. R. (2008). Consumer behavior. New Jersey: Prentice hall.

34.

Taylor, V. A. & Bearden, W. O. (2002). The effects of price on brand extension evaluations:The moderating role of extension similarity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 131-140.

35.

Yeo, J. S. & Park, J. W. (2006).. Effects of parent-extension similarity and self regulatory focus on evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 272-282.

logo