바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

신뢰게임 시 주관적 정보와 객관적 정보의 제시 순서가 투자 행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

The effect of the presentation order of facial trustworthiness and prior repayment ratio of trustees on the investment behaviors during trust games

초록

본 연구는 불확실한 투자결정 상황에서 자동적이고 직관적인 정보처리과정을 거치는 얼굴 신뢰도 관련 주관적 정보와 인지적인 정보처리과정을 거쳐 투자행동에 영향을 미치는 과거 평판 관련 객관적 정보가 함께 제시될 때 각각이 투자 행동에 미치는 영향을 독립적으로 관찰하기 위해 고안되었다. 각 실험참가자는 신뢰게임(trust game)을 통해 피투자자의 얼굴사진과 과거 게임에서의 평균 반환 비율 정보라는 두 가지 정보에 기초하여 투자할 금액을 결정하도록 지시받았다. 두 가지 정보의 제시 순서가 투자 금액에 미치는 효과를 관찰하기 위해 전체 시행 중 절반은 얼굴정보가 먼저 제시되었고, 나머지 절반은 과거반환비율정보가 먼저 제시되었다. 연구 결과 과거 투자액 반환 비율과 같은 객관적 정보가 함께 제시될 경우에도 피투자자의 얼굴 신뢰도에 따라 투자 행동이 영향 받을 수 있음을 관찰하였다. 또한, 정보가 제시되는 순서에 따라 얼굴 신뢰도 효과는 유의미한 차이를 보였으며 얼굴 정보가 반환 비율 정보 이후에 제시되었을 경우 얼굴인상 효과가 더 높게 나타남을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구 결과들은 투자행동이 직관적 정보처리 기제와 통제적 정보처리 기제라는 독립된 정보처리 기제들의 상호작용을 통해 이루어진다는 이중정보처리 모형을 지지하고 있다.

keywords
이중정보처리모형, 얼굴, 신뢰, 반환비율, 투자행동, face, trustworthiness, repayment ratio, investment, dual-process model, face, trustworthiness, repayment ratio, investment, dual-process model

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the role of automatic and intuitive information, when presented together with deliberative and cognitive contextual information, in affecting investment behavior under the situation of uncertain and risky decision. Each participant, playing a role as trustor in laboratory trust games, was instructed to decide the amount of investment based on a photograph of the face and prior repayment ratio (RR) of a trustee. To examine the effect of information presentation order, participant viewed facial information prior to repayment ratio in the half of the trials, and the order was reversed for the rest of the trials. The experimental findings suggest that investment decisions can be influenced by facial trustworthiness of trustees even when repayment ratio is provided together. In addition, the effect of facial impression in investment decision can be significantly modulated by the presentation order, revealing increased facial impression effect in the trials where facial information follows RR information. The present study suggests that human investment behavior can be the final product of close interplay between two independent decision modules: intuitive vs. logical decision systems, supporting the idea of the dual process model.

keywords
face, trustworthiness, repayment ratio, investment, dual-process model

참고문헌

1.

김은주, 김정일, 남승규 (2009). 광고모델효과의 출처 및 원인 분석, 광고학연구, 20(4), 75-87

2.

기화서, 이승엽 (2000). 비교의 강도와 정보원의 신뢰도가 비교광고의 효과에 미치는 영향, 광고연구, 46, 175-195

3.

성영신, 박진영, 박은아 (2002). 온라인 구전정보가 영화관람 의도에 미치는 영향. 광고연구, 57, 31-52.

4.

성영신, 정건지, 장 영 (2004). 모델의 매력도와 시선처리에 따른 광고효과 연구. 광고연구, 62, 55-81.

5.

이호배, 정이규 (1997). 유명인 광고모델속성이 공고태도와 상표태도에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 8(2), 167-181

6.

이온죽, Lin, N, Khondker, H 외 저 (2004). 신뢰: 지구촌 시대의 사회적 자본. 집문당

7.

Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (1994). Impaired recognition of emotion in facial expressions following bilateral damage to the human amygdala. Nature, 372(6507), 669-672.

8.

Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O'Connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32(3), 537-551.

9.

Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 42-58.

10.

Baumgartner, T., Heinrichs, M., Vonlanthen, A., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2008). Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron, 58(4), 639-650.

11.

Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142.

12.

Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1387-1397.

13.

Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual -process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

14.

Cohen, D. (1972). Advertising. New York: John Willy Sons.

15.

Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychological Science, 15(12), 806-813.,

16.

De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684-687.

17.

Delgado, M., Frank, R., & Phelps, E. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nat Neurosci, 8(11), 1611-1618.

18.

Dickhaut, J., Hubbard, J., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (1997). Trust, reciprocity, and interpersonal history: Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Tucson, Arizona: University of Arizona, Economic Science Laboratory.

19.

Dipboye, R. L., Arvey, R. D., & Terpstra, D. E. (1977). Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 288-294.

20.

Dodd, T. H., Laverie, D. A., Wilcox, J. F., & Duhan, D. F. (2005). Differential effects of experience, subjective knowledge, and objective knowledge on sources of information used in consumer wine purchasing. Journal of Hospital & Tourism Research, 29, 3-19.

21.

Doney, P. M., & Canon, J. P. (1997). An examination of trust in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing, 2, 35-51.

22.

Downs, A. C., & Lyons, P. M. (1991). Natural observations of the links between attractiveness and initial legal judgments. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 541-547.

23.

Ellen, P.S. (1994). Do we know what we need to know? Objective and subjective knowledge effects on pro-ecological behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 30, 43-52.

24.

Engell, A. D., Haxby, J. V., & Todorov, A. (2007). Implicit trustworthiness decisions: Automatic coding of face properties in human amygdala. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 19, 1508-1519.

25.

Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43-54.

26.

Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Russell, J. (1991). Attractiveness and income for men and women in management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(13), 1039-1057.

27.

Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1174-1194.

28.

Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2009). Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 324(5927), 646-648.

29.

Hemsley, G. D., & Doob, A. N. (1978). The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a communicator's credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 136-144.

30.

Holbrook, M. B. (1978). Beyond attribute structure. Journal of Marketing Research. 15(4), 540-556.

31.

House, L., Lusk, J. Jaeger, S., Traill, W. B., Moore, M., Valli, C. Morrow, B., & Yee, W. (2004). Objective and subjective knowledge: Impacts on consumer demand for genetically modified foods in the United States and the European Union. AgBioForum, 7(3), 113-123.

32.

Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. M. (1985). Physical attractiveness of the celebrity endorser: A social adaption perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 954-961.

33.

Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.

34.

Kim, H., Somerville, L. H., Johnstone, T., Alexander, A. L, & Whalen, P. J (2003). .Inverse amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex responses to surprised faces. Neuroreport, 14 (18), 2317-2322.

35.

Kim, H., Adolphs, R., O'Doherty, J. P., Shimojo, S. (2007). Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104 (46), 18253-18258.

36.

King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308, 78-83.

37.

Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435(7042), 673-676.

38.

Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2004). Animal spirits: Affective and deliberative processes in economic behavior. Working paper, Dept. of Social and Decision Sciences, CMU.

39.

Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in moden societies: The search for the bases of social order. Cambridge, England: Polity Press

40.

Mohr, J., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Communication strategies in marketing channels: a theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36-51.

41.

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). Commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.

42.

Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J Cogn Neurosci, 14(8), 1215-1229.

43.

Raju, P. S., Lonial, S. C., & Mangold, W. G. (1995). Differential effects of subjective knowledge, and Usage Experience on decision making: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(2), 153-180.

44.

Roussean, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1999).Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.

45.

Shiv, B. & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 278-292.

46.

Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 410-414.

47.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665.

48.

Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach /avoidance behaviors. In M. Miller & A. Kingstone (Eds.), The year in cognitive neuroscience 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 1124, pp. 208-224).

49.

Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813-833.

50.

van't Wout, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2008). Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition, 108(3), 796-803.

51.

Vohs, K. D., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 537-547.

52.

Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 189-202.

53.

Wright, C. I., Fischer, H., Whalen, P. J., McInerney, S. C., Shin, L. M., & Rauch, S. L. (2001). Differential prefrontal cortex and amygdala habituation to repeatedly presented emotional stimuli. Neuroreport, 12(2), 379 -383.

54.

Yamagishi, T. (1998). Structure of Trust, (김의철, 박영신, 이상미 역, 2001. 신뢰의 구조-동서양의 비교. 서울: 교육과학사)

logo