바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Influence of Price Change on Consumer Perceptions of Price Fairness: Focused on Roles of The Types of Price Change and Self-Regulatory Focus

Abstract

Perceived price fairness of consumers has become an important consideration factor in firm's pricing policies and prior research has emphasized the importance of causes and types of price change. According to prior research, consumers perceive the price change as fair when an increase in a firm's cost makes their price change, whereas consumers perceive the price change as unfair when the pursuit of firm's profit makes their price change. In the context of types of price change, consumers are more sensitive to loss occurrence than to gain decrease. Thus, consumers perceive removal of discounted price more fairly than price increase. But prior research did not consider the motivation level of consumers and suggested the results of the limited situation. Thus, they raise questions about generalizability of results. Therefore, this research examines the roles of self-regulatory focus and the types of price change on fairness perceptions of consumers across causes of price change. Especially, this research suggests “gain decrease” as “capacity decrease of products”(experiment 1) or “quality decrease”(experiment 2). The findings indicate that consumers were more likely to perceive fairness when firm's price change was caused by increasing cost(vs. the pursuit of profit). Also, when price change was caused by increasing cost, the effects of self-regulatory focus and the types of price change were not significant. However, when price change was caused by the pursuit of profit, the effects of the types of price change on fairness perceptions of consumers vary depending on self-regulatory focus. Individuals in a promotion focus regarded price increase more fairly than quality decrease or capacity decrease of products, whereas individuals in a prevention focus considered quality or capacity decrease more fairly than price increase. Finally, discussion of the results, implications, and new ideas for further research were suggested.

keywords
price fairness, price change, causes of price change, types of price change, self-regulatory focus

Reference

1.

김재휘, 이지선 (2009). 자기개념 점화와 메시지 프레이밍이 설득에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 20(1), 66-76.

2.

박현숙, 곽원섭 (2003). 소비자의 가격·품질 지각에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 소비자, 광고, 4(2), 1-21.

3.

여준상 (2007). 비교유형이 브랜드태도에 영향을 미치는데 있어 자기조절초점의 조절 역할. 광고학연구, 18(5), 339-349.

4.

이진용 (1996). 가격정책의 공정성에 대한 소비자 판단에 관한 연구. 마케팅연구, 11(1), 77-104.

5.

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp.267-299). New York: Academic Press.

6.

Ailawadi, K. L., Neslin, S. A., & Gedenk, K. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65(January), 71-89.

7.

Akerlof, G. A. (1979). The case against conservative macroeconomics: An inaugural lecture. Economica, 46(August), 219-237.

8.

Anderoni, J. (1995). Warm-glow and cold-prickle: The effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 1-21.

9.

Arrow, K. (1973). Social responsibility and economic efficiency. Public Policy, 21(Summer), 303-317.

10.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(December), 1173-1182.

11.

Bearden, W. O., Carlson, J. P., & Hardesty, D. M. (2003). Using invoice price information to frame advertised price. Journal of Business Research, 56(5), 355-366.

12.

Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March), 474-491.

13.

Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), 189-199.

14.

Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(February), 117-132.

15.

Darke, P. R., & Dahl, D. W. (2003). Fairness and discounts: The subjective value of a bargain. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 328-338.

16.

Divine, R. L. (1995). The influence of price on the relationship between involvement and consideration set size. Marketing Letter, 6(4), 309-319.

17.

Haws, K. L., and Bearden W. O. (2006). Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(December), 304-311.

18.

Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-Discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(July), 319-340.

19.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300.

20.

Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(February), 276-286.

21.

Homans, G. C. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourts, Brace & World.

22.

Huber, J., & McCann, J. (1982). The Impact of Inferential Beliefs on Product Evaluations. Journal of Marketing, 19(August), 324-333.

23.

Huffman, C., Ratneshwar, S., & Mick, D. G. (2000). Consumer goal structures and goal-determination process. In S. Ratneshwar, D. G. Mick, & C. Huffmanin(Eds.), The Why of Consumption (pp. 9-35). London: Routledge.

24.

Huppertz, J. W., Arenson, S. J., & Evans, R. H. (1978). An application of equity theory to buyer-seller exchange situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(May), 250-260.

25.

Jacoby, J. (1976). Consumer and industrial psychology: Prospects for theory corroboration and mutual contribution. In M. D. Dunnette(Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp.1031-1061). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

26.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlement in the market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728-741.

27.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, Amos. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(March), 263-291

28.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, value, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(April), 341-350.

29.

Keller, P. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(June), 109-114.

30.

Kirmani, A., & Zhu, R. (2007). The effect of regulatory focus on use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(November), 688-701.

31.

Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.

32.

Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2009). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(May), 151-165.

33.

Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). How consumers are affected by framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374-378.

34.

Levin, I. P., & Johnson, R. D. (1984). Estimating price-quality tradeoffs using comparative judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(June), 593-600.

35.

Levin, I. P., Johnson, R. D., & Faraone, S. V. (1984), Information integration in price-quality tradeoffs: The effect of missing information. Memory & Cognition, 12(2), 96-102.

36.

Liberman, N., Molden, D. C., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: Implications for attributional functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(January), 5-18.

37.

Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854-864.

38.

Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp.293-355). New York: Academic Press.

39.

Major, B., & Testa, M. (1989). Social comparisons processes and judgments of entitlement and satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(2), 101-120.

40.

Martins, M. (1995). An experimental investigation of the effects of perceived price fairness of sacrifice and value. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois.

41.

Maxwell, S. (1995). What makes a price increase seem ‘fair’? Pricing Strategy & Practice, 3(4), 21-27.

42.

Monroe, K. B. (2003). In B. Ridge(Ed.), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. IL: Mcgraw- Hill/Irwin.

43.

Monroe, K. B., & Chapman, J. D. (1987). Framing effects on buyers' subjective product evaluations, Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 193-197.

44.

Mussweiler, T. (2003). ‘Everything is relative’: Comparison processes in social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(6), 719-733.

45.

Odean, T. (1998). Volume, volatility, price, and profit when all traders are above average. Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1887-1934.

46.

Okun, A. (1981). Prices and Quantities: A Macroeconomic Analysis. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

47.

Oliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989). Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach. Journal of Marketing, 53(April), 21-35.

48.

Ordóñez, L. D., Connolly, T. & Coughlan, R. (2000). Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(3), 329-344.

49.

Pham, M. T., & Avnet, T. (2004). Ideals and oughts and the reliance on affect versus substance in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(March), 503-518.

50.

Pham, M. T. & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Promotion and prevention in consumer decision making: The state of the art and theoretical propositions. In S. Ratneshwar & D. G. Mickin(Eds.), Inside Consumption: Consumer Motives, Goals, and Desires (pp.8-43). London: Routledge.

51.

Sinha, I., & Batra, R. (1999). The effect of consumer price consciousness on private label purchase. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(3), 237-251.

52.

Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effect in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt(Ed.), Sociological Methodology. CA: Jossey-Bass.

53.

Solow, R. M. (1980). On theories of unemployment. American Economic Review, 70(March), 1-11.

54.

Swaminathan, V., Page, K. L., & Gürhan-Canli, Z. (2007). “My” brand or “our” brand: The effects of brand relationship dimensions and self-construal on brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(August), 248-259.

55.

Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(March), 39-60.

56.

Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(Summer), 199-214.

57.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.

58.

Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 1-15.

59.

Yamagishi, T., & Hill, C. T. (1981). Adding versus averaging models revisited: A test of a path-analytic integration model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(1), 13-25.

logo