바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

The Difference of Product Judgement and Consideration Set on Digital Convergence Product depending on Categorization Methods

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to examine whether digital convergence product's Judgement and Consideration set vary with marketers' inducement within which the way of categorization is changed from taxonomic to goal-derived ones. In study 1, it is found that, under goal-derived conditions, although they belong to different categories, products are more likely to; 1)be regarded as similar, 2)be included in Consideration set, 3)be estimated highly in terms of typicality and goal-suitability, and 4)get purchase intention, than ones under the other conditions. In study 2, Consumers have a high opinion on the typicality and goal-suitability of the PMP under goal-derived conditions. Attitude is moderated by consumers' prior knowledge and involvement. Product attitude is highly shown under goal-derived conditions, on the other hand, purchase intention does not alter under both conditions of goal-derived and taxonomic categorization. Only in the case where consumers have much prior knowledge under goal derived conditions, their purchase intention is shown in high.

keywords
digital convergence, category, categorization, Taxonomic categorization, goal-derived categorization

Reference

1.

고달영 (2006). 임시범주 광고유형이 제품선호도와 구매의향에 미치는 영향. 홍익대학교 광고홍보대학원 석사학위 논문.

2.

김문용 (2003). 혁신제품에 대한 소비자 반응에 영향을 미치는 선행변수에 관한 연구 : 소비자의 전문성, 혁신의 연속성, 광고메시지 유형을 중심으로. 한국과학기술원 석사학위논문.

3.

Alba, J., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411-454.

4.

Barsalou, L. W. (l991). Deriving Categories to Achieve Goals. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advance in Research and Theory, 27, l-64.

5.

Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93.

6.

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc Categories," Memory & Cognition, Vol. 1, No.3, pp.211-227.

7.

Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, Central Tendency & Frequency of Instantiation as Determinants of Graded Structure in Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 11, 629- 654.

8.

Barsalou, L. W., & Medin, D. L. (1986). Concepts: Fixed definitions or dynamic context dependent representations? Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 6(2), 87-202.

9.

Belk, R. (1975a). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 157-164.

10.

Bettman, J., & Sujan, M. (1987). Effects of framing on evaluations of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 141-154.

11.

Bettman, J. R.(1979). An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice., Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley

12.

Campbell, B. M. (1969). The Existence of Evoked Set and Determinants of Its Magnitude in Brand Choice Behavior. Unpublished Ph. D Dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY.

13.

Carpenter, G., & Nakamoto. K. (1989). Consumer Preference Formation and Pioneering Advantage. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 285-298.

14.

Cohen, J. B. (1982). The Role of Affect in Categorization: Toward a Reconsideration of the Concept of Attitude. Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 94-100.

15.

Dickson, P. R. (1982). Person-situation: Segmentation's Missing Link, Journal of Marketing 46, 55-81.

16.

Engel, J. F., & Blackwell. R. D. (1982). Consumer Behavior, 4th edition. New York, NY: The Dryden Press.

17.

Felcher, E. M., Malaviya, P., McGill, A. L. (2001). The role of taxonomic and goal-derived product categorization in, within, and across category judgments. Psychology and Marketing 18(8), 865-887.

18.

Heath, C., & Soll. J. B. (1996). Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 40-52.

19.

Homa, D. (1984). On the Nature of Categories. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 18, 49-94.

20.

Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley.

21.

Hutchinson, J. W. (1983). Expertise and the structure of free recall. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 585-589.

22.

Johnson, E., & Russo, J. E. (1984). Product Familiarity and Learning New Information. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542-550.

23.

Lockheed, G. R.(1982). Know, then decide. In: T. Wallsten, Editor, Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1982), pp.143–154.

24.

Loken, B., & Ward. J. (1990). Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 111-126.

25.

Loken, B., & Ward. J. (1987). Measures of Attribute Structure Underlying Product Typicality. Advances Consumer Research, l4, 22- 26.

26.

Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238

27.

Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1981). Strategies and classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 241-253.

28.

Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 113-138.

29.

Meyers-Levy, J. & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 39-54.

30.

Narayana, C. L., & Markin, R. (1975). Consumer Behavior and Product Performance: An Alternative Conceptualization. Journal of Marketing, 39, l-6

31.

Nedungadi, P., & Hutchinson. J. (1985). The Prototypicality of Brands: Relationships with Brand Awareness, Preference and Usage. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 498-503.

32.

Osgood, C., Succi, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

33.

Park, C. W., & Lessig, P. (1981). Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 223- 230

34.

Park, C. W. & Smith, D. (1989). Product-level choice: A top-down or bottom-up process? Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 289-299.

35.

Ratneshwar, S., Pechmann, C., & Shocker, A. D. (1996). Goal-derived categories and the antecedents of Facross-category consideration. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 240-250.

36.

Roberts, J. H., & Lattin, J. M. (1991). Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research 28, 429–440.

37.

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press.

38.

Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976). Structural Behavior of Typicality Effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 491-502.

39.

Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family Resemblance: Studies in the International Structure of Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.

40.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D. & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573- 605.

41.

Shocker, A. D., Ben-Akiva, M., Boccara, B., & Nedungadi, P. (1991). Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: models and suggestions. Marketing Letters, 2(3), 181-197.

42.

Shocker, A. D., Bayus, B. L., & Kim, N. (2004). Product complements and substitutes in the real world: The relevance of other products. Journal of Marketing 68(1), 28-40.

43.

Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

44.

Srivastava, R. K., Alpert, M. I, & Shocker. A. D. (1984). A Consumer-Oriented Approach for Determining Market Structures, Journal of Marketing, 48, 32-45.

45.

Sujan, M., & Dekleva, C. (1987). Product categorization and inference making: Some implications for comparative advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 372-378.

46.

Troye, S. V. (1984). Evoked Set Formation as a Categorization Process. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 180-186.

47.

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of Similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.

48.

Veryzer, R. W. & Hutchinson. J. W. (1998). The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 374-394.

49.

Wänke, M., Bless, H., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Lobster, Wine, and Cigarettes: Ad Hoc Categorizations and the Emergence of Context Effects. Marketing Bulletin, 10, 52-56.

50.

Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 341-352.

51.

Zanten, R., Reid. M., & Mavondo. F. (2009). Social and situational influences on cross-category consideration. Proceedings of the Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, 30 Nov - 2 Dec, Melbourne.

logo