바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Social Comparison Influences Risky Financial Decisions

Abstract

Despite the well-known effect of social comparison on our thoughts and behaviors, little is known about its influence on financial decision-making in a controlled laboratory setting. To investigate the effect of social comparison on risky financial decisions, the present study used a gambling-like game, where a player can see the outcomes of both himself/herself and the partner at the end of each game trial, and chooses to accept the outcome or to replay the game. A repeated measures ANOVA test using three levels of absolute outcome(gain, break-even and loss) and three levels of relative outcome(gain, equal, and loss) revealed significant main effects as well as an interaction effect of both absolute and relative outcomes on risk-aversion choices. In addition, a subsequent logistic regression analysis revealed that participants’ risk-aversion choices were affected significantly by the relative income only for the absolute loss trials. The present results demonstrated that perceived value of one's monetary outcome during gambling can be affected by others' outcomes, predominantly in a situation of financial loss, potentially providing a useful experimental framework that allows for a quantitative measure of the amount of social comparison.

keywords
decision making, social comparison, financial risk, gambling, loss aversion

Reference

1.

닥터아파트. http://www.drapt.com.

2.

Shiller, R. J., 김태훈 역 (2009). 야성적 충동. 랜덤하우스코리아.

3.

궈옌링, 강경이 역 (2007). 워렌 버핏의 9가지 충고. 이스트북스.

4.

김지영, 권석만 (2009). 용서특질척도의 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28, 239 -261.

5.

김현 (2005). Rich Way By Warren Buffett. 엔젤트리.

6.

심영철 (2007). 한국의 주식 부자들. 토네이도.

7.

채규만, 이홍표 (2004). 위험추구 소인과 도박동기 및 도박 심각도의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9, 1061-1075.

8.

한덕웅, 장은영 (2002). 사회비교가 분노경험, 주관안녕 및 건강지각에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8, 85-112.

9.

Arkes, H. R., Herren, L. T., & Isen, A. M. (1988). Role of possible loss in the influence of positive affect on risk preference. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 181-193.

10.

Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. E. (1993). Effects of social comparison direction, threat, and self-esteem on affects, self-evaluation, and expected success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 708-722.

11.

Boles, T. L., & Messick, D. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 262-275.

12.

Byrne, R. M. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 426-431.

13.

Clark, A., Frijters, P., & Michael, A. S. (2008). Relative incomes, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95-144.

14.

Clark, A., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359-381.

15.

Easterlin, R. A. (1974) Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence (pp.89-125). Nations and households in economic growth, New York: Academic Press.

16.

Easterlin, R. A. (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35-47.

17.

Festinger, L. A. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Process. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.

18.

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2005). Income and Well -being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 997-1019.

19.

Fliessbach, K., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Dohmen, T., Sunde, U., Elger, C. E., & Falk, A. (2007). Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum. Science, 318, 1305-1308.

20.

Gibbon, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 129-142.

21.

Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparison Arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 227-236.

22.

Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001) Rational choice in an uncertain world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

23.

Isen, A. M. (1993). Positive affect and decision making. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland(Eds.), Handbook of emotions, New York: Guilford, 261-277.

24.

Isen, A. M., & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process, 39, 145-154.

25.

Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1998). Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains losses: It is just not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 710-717.

26.

Isen, A. M., Shalker, T. E., Clark, M., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1-12.

27.

Isen, A. M., & Simmonds, S. (1978). The effect of feeling good on a helping task that is incompatible with good mood. Social Psychology Quarterly, 41, 346-349.

28.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292.

29.

Knez, M. J., & Camerer, C. F. (1995). Outside option and social comparison in three-player ultimatum game experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 65-94.

30.

Knowles, E. S., Cutter, H. S. G., Wlash, D. H., & Casey, N. A. (1973). Risk-taking as a personality trait. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 1, 123-136.

31.

Kruglanski, A. W., & Mayseless, O. (1990). Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 195-208.

32.

Loewenstein, G. F., Bazerman, M. H., & Thompson, L. (1989). Social Utility and Decision-Making in Interpersonal Contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 426-441.

33.

Major, B., & Forcey, B. (1985). Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preference for same-sex and same-job wage comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 393-405.

34.

Nygren, T. E., Isen, A. M., Taylor, P. J., & Dullin, J. (1996). The influence of positive affect on the decision rule in risk situations: Focus on outcome (and especially avoidance of loss) rather than probability. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 59-72.

35.

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M .E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

36.

Post, T., Baltussen, G., den Assem, M. V., & Thaler, R. H. (2008) Deal or no deal?: Decision making under risk in large-payoff game show. The American Economic Review, 98, 38-71.

37.

Reis, T. J., & Gibbons, F. X. (1993). Social comparison and the pill: Reactions to upward and downward comparison of contraceptive behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 13-20.

38.

Salovey, P., & Rodin, J. (1984). Some antecedents and consequences of social comparison jealousy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 780-792.

39.

Schneider, S. L., & Lopes, L. L. (1986). Reflection in preferences under risk: Who and when may suggest why. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 535-548.

40.

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Fischer, M., Dvash, J., Harari, H., & Perach-Bloom, N. (2009). Intranasal administration of oxytocin increases envy and schadenfreude(gloating). Biological Psychiatry, 66, 864-870.

41.

Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 40, 777-790.

42.

Takahashi, H., Kato, M., Matsuura, M., Mobbs, D., Suhara, T., & Okubo, Y. (2009). When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: Neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude. SCIENCE, 323, 937-939.

43.

Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60.

44.

Taylor, S. E., Wayment, H. A., & Carillo, M. (1996). Social comparison, self-regulation, and motivation. In R. M.S orrentino & E. T. Higgins(Eds.), Motivation & Cognition. The Guilford Press.

45.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, H. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference- dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039-1061.

46.

Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Allynand Bacon, Boston.

47.

Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1034-1048.

48.

Wheeler, L., & Miyake, K. (1992). Social comparison in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 760-773.

49.

Wills, T. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245-271.

50.

Wood, J. V., Taylor, S. E., & Lightman, R. R. (1985). Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1169-1183.

logo