바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

시간적 거리와 브랜드확장 적합성이 확장브랜드 평가에 미치는 영향에서 모브랜드 광고 기대불일치성의 조절적 역할

The moderating role of expectancy incongruency of parent brand’s advertising in the evaluation toward brand extension by temporal distance

초록

브랜드 확장 연구에서 모브랜드의 광고 크리에이티브의 역할의 중요성에도 불구하고 이를 규명한 연구는 찾아보기 어렵다. 본 연구의 목적은 브랜드 확장 시에 확장브랜드에 대한 평가에서 시간적 거리의 영향과 함께 모브랜드 광고표현의 기대불일치성의 조절적 역할을 규명하는 것이다. 이를 위해 대학생을 대상으로 2(브랜드확장 적합성: 적합, 부적합) x 2(시간거리: 가까운 미래, 먼 미래) x 2(광고 기대불일치 정도: 높음, 낮음) 피험자 간 실험을 하였다. 분석결과, 시간적 거리가 가까울 때에는 부적합확장에 비해 적합확장에 대한 태도가 긍정적이었지만 시간적 거리가 먼 미래일 때에는 적합확장과 부적합확장 간에는 태도의 차이가 없었다. 모브랜드 광고유형의 기대불일치성의 효과가 나타났는데, 광고표현의 기대불일치성이 높을 때는 낮을 때에 비해 전반적으로 확장브랜드에 대한 태도가 더 높았다. 나아가 광고표현의 기대불일치성의 조절효과를 발견할 수 있었다. 모브랜드 광고표현의 기대불일치성이 낮을 때는 가까운 미래에서는 적합확장이 부적합확장에 비해 평가가 긍정적이지만 먼 미래에서는 적합확장과 부적합확장에 대한 태도는 차이가 없었다. 하지만 모브랜드 광고표현의 기대불일치성이 높을 때는 시간적 거리가 가깝다 하더라도 적합확장과 부적합확장에 대한 태도는 차이가 없었다. 결과를 바탕으로 시사점과 향후 연구에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
광고, 광고 비주얼, 시간적 거리, 기대불일치성, 브랜드확장, Advertising, Advertisement visual, Temporal distance, Expectancy incongruency, Brand extension

Abstract

No research has attempted to find out the role of advertisement creative in brand extensions. This research is interested in clarifying the moderating role of expectancy incongruency of parent brand’s advertising in the attitudes toward brand extensions by temporal distance. Results show that when temporal distance was near future congruent brand extension was preferred to incongruent brand extension. However, when temporal distance was far from present time no difference was found in attitudes toward brand extensions. Parent brand’s advertising incongruency contributed to favorable attitudes toward brand extensions overall and moderated the effect of temporal distance. When incongruency level of advertising was low interaction between temporal distance and type of extensions(congruent, incongruent brand extension) was found. However, no significant difference was found in attitudes toward congruent versus incongruent brand extensions when the level of advertising incongruency was high.

keywords
Advertising, Advertisement visual, Temporal distance, Expectancy incongruency, Brand extension

참고문헌

1.

곽준식 (2007). 시간적 거리에 따른 확장 브랜드 평가 차이에 관한 연구. 한국경영학회 통합학술 대회 논문집.

2.

나준희 (2007). 브랜드 확장에 있어서 시간적 거리를 이용한 프리어나운싱의 효과. 마케팅연구, 22(3), 1-17.

3.

도선재, 전주언, 문영준 (2009). 브랜드확장의 적합성에 따른 시간적 거리의 제시 효과: 브랜드 컨셉과 브랜드 친숙성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 소비자 광고,10(1), 79-99.

4.

심성욱 (2004). 브랜드 확장에서의 광고효과: 모 제품과 확장 제품 간의 연결성 연구. 광고학연구, 15(5), 131-151.

5.

안광호, 이재홍, 허영회 (2012). 소비자, 모 브랜드, 확장제품범주 간의 젠더 이미지 일치성이 확장제품에 대한 소비자 태도와 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 광고학연구, 23(6), 161-181.

6.

여준상 (2010). 조절초점, 확장제품의 제조 난이도, 모브랜드-확장제품간 유사성이 브랜드확장 평가에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자 광고, 11(2), 257-272.

7.

우석봉, 성영신 (2005). 비주얼의 기대불일치성과 표현 독특성. 광고학연구, 16(3), 219-250.

8.

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. NY; The Free Press.

9.

Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54, 27-41.

10.

Banerjeep, P., Mishra, S., & Zhao, G. (2011). Temporal Construal, Categorization Processes, and Brand Extension Evaluation. Advances in Consumer Research, 38, 829-830.

11.

Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W. (2002). Mood and brand extension judgments: Asymmetric effects of desirable versus undesirable brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 283-290.

12.

Barone, M. J., Miniard, P. W., & Romeo, J. B. (2000). The influence of positive mood on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 386-400.

13.

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211-227.

14.

Belch, M. A., & Belch, G. E. (2013). The future of creativity in advertising. Journal of Promotion Management, 25(August), 395-399.

15.

Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. NY: Appleton Century Crofts.

16.

Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (2001). The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 53, 111-122.

17.

Boush, D. M., & Loken, B. (1991). A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 16-28.

18.

Boush, D. M., Shipp, S., Loken, B., Gencturk, E., Crockett, S., Kennedy, E. (1987). Affect generalization to similar and dissimilar brand extensions. Psychology & Marketing, 225-237.

19.

Bransford, J. D., Barclay, R., & Franks, J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3(2), 193-209.

20.

Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 214-228.

21.

Cohen, J. B., & Basu, K. (1987). Alternative models of categorization: Toward a contingent processing framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 455-472.

22.

Dahlen, M., Friberg, L., & Nilsson, E. (2009). Long live creative media choice. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 121-129.

23.

Foster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequence for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.

24.

Goodman, G. S. (1980). Picture memory: How the action scheme affects retention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(4), 473-495.

25.

Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2008). Art and the brand: The role of visual art in enhancing brand extendibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 212-222.

26.

Hastie, R., & Kumar, P. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 25-38.

27.

Heckler, S. E., & Childers, T. L. (1992). The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(March), 475-492.

28.

Herr, P. M., Farquar, P. H., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Impact of dominance and relatedness on brand extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5, 135-159.

29.

Kapferer, J-N. (2009). The new strategic brand management(4ed.). Paris: Editions d’ Organisation.

30.

Keller, K. L. (2007). Advertising and brand equity. In Tellis, G. J., & Ambler, T.(Ed.). The Sage handbook of advertising, London: Sage Publications Inc.

31.

Keller, K. L (2002). Branding and brand equity. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

32.

Keller, K. L., & Aaker, D. A. (1992).The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 35-50.

33.

Kevin, L., Brian, D., & Jose, M. (2014). Advertising Creativity: The Role of Divergence Versus Meaningfulness. Journal of Advertising, 43(3), 274-285.

34.

Kim, H., & John, D. R. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 116-126.

35.

Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. NC: Duke University Press.

36.

Kreuzbauer, R., & Matler, A. J. (2005). Embodied cognition and new product design: Changing product form to influence brand categorization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 65-76.

37.

Lee, Y. H., & Mason, C. (1999). Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(September), 156-169.

38.

Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: When do brand extensions have a negative impact? Journal of Marketing, 57, 71-84.

39.

Markman, E. M., & Hutchinson, J. (1984). Children’s sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1-27.

40.

Martin, B., Gnoth, J., & Strong, C. (2009). Temporal construal in advertising: The moderating role of temporal orientation and attribute importance in consumer evaluations. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 5-19.

41.

McCrae, R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.

42.

Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.

43.

Meng, L. (2007). A Left-brain Exploration of Consumer Creativity: Creative Thinking, Product Evaluation, and Cultural Differences. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota.

44.

Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(June), 39-54.

45.

Miniard, P. M., Bhatla, S., Lord, K., Dickson, P., & Unnava, H. R. (1991). Picture-based persuasion process and the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(June), 92-107.

46.

Monga, A., & Houston, M. J. (2002). The brand extension evaluation process: Insights from the continuum model of impression formation. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 188-189.

47.

Murray, N., Harish, S., Edward, R., & Mita, S. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 411-425.

48.

Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 185-193.

49.

Rosengren, S., Dahlen, M., & Modig, E. (2013). Think outside the ad: Can advertising creativity benefit more than the advertiser? Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 320-330.

50.

Sagristano, M., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent Gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 364-376.

51.

Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (1992). The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 296-313.

52.

Sujan, M., & Bettman, J. (1989). The effects of brand positioning strategies on consumers’ brand and category perceptions: Some insights from consumer research. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(November), 454-467.

53.

Trope, Y. (2004). Theory in social psychology: Seeing the forest and the trees. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 193-200.

54.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.

55.

Volckner, F., & Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of brand extension success. Journal of Marketing, 70, 18-34.

56.

Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.

57.

Yeo, J., & Park. J. (2006). Effects of Parent-Extension Similarity and Self Regulatory Focus on Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 272-282.

58.

Zinkhan, G. M. (1993). Creativity in advertising: Creativity in the Journal of Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 22, 1-3.

logo