open access
메뉴.png){kind=logo}
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-8778
Research investigating the effect of mood on self-control has generated considerable interest. However, unlike negative moods, the role of positive mood on self-control is ambiguous. In the present research, we investigated the differential impact of the AE/AR mechanism in positive moods and of product information on self-control. In Study 1, we investigated the impact of two critical factors on consumers' purchase intention toward an unhealthy food item (beverage): mood and product information. Using a 2 x 2 between-subject factorial design on purchase intension, we found that consumers' intention to purchase was more positive when cost attributes were not included in the product information(M = 4.72) than when cost attributes were included in the product information(M = 3.55). More importantly, interaction between mood and product information was significant(F = 61.728, df = 1, p < .001). Contrast analysis supported our hypotheses. When cost attributes were included in the product information, consumers in the positive mood condition(M = 2.98) had lower purchase intentions toward unhealthy food than did consumers in the neutral mood condition (M = 4.13). However, when cost attributes weren't included in the product information, consumers in the positive mood condition(M = 5.31) had higher purchase intentions toward unhealthy food than did consumers in the neutral mood condition(M = 3.96). In addition, our results showed that anticipated mood mediated the effect of mood on purchase intentions when cost attributes were included in the product information(a = .84, b = -.29, a x b = -.24, 95% CI: -.5424 ∼ -.0263). Path coefficients showed that an AR mechanism of positive mood was activated when cost attributes were included in the product information. Our results also showed that anticipated mood mediated the effect of mood on purchase intentions when cost attributes were not included in the product information(a = -1.58, b = -.17, a x b = .26, 95% CI: .0307 ∼ .6656). Path coefficients showed that an AE mechanism was activated when cost attributes were not included in the product information. In Study 2, we investigated the effect of three critical factors on consumers' WTPs for unhealthy(hamburger) and healthy(salad) foods: mood, food type, and evaluation mode. Using a 2 x 2 x 2 design on WTP, we found differential effects of mood between Joint Evaluation(JE) and Single Evaluation(SE). In the JE condition, interaction between mood and food type was marginally significant(F = 3.453, df = 1, p = .71). For consumers in the neutral mood condition, food type had no impact on their WTPs(unhealthy food: 3975 vs. healthy food: 3820; t = -.308, p > .1). However, consumers in the positive mood condition had higher WTPs for healthy food(M = 5215) than for unhealthy food(M = 4000). In the SE condition, we found main effects for mood. Consumers' WTPs were higher in the positive mood condition(M = 4509.5) than in the neutral mood condition(M = 3807.3; F = 4.141, df = 1, p < .05). More importantly, interaction between mood and food type was significant(F = 4.415, df = 1, p < .05). For consumers in the neutral mood condition, food type had no impact on their WTPs (unhealthy food: 3705 vs. healthy food: 3904.8; t = .407, p > .1). However, consumers in the positive mood condition had higher WTPs for unhealthy food(M = 5138.1) than for healthy food(M = 3881). In Study 3, we investigated the boundary conditions of the effects of mood and product information on self-control. Specifically, Study 3 showed that the effects of mood and product information on self-control were attenuated in the high cognitive load condition. We investigated the impact of three critical factors on WTP of an unhealthy food(chocolate cake): mood, product information, and cognitive load. Using a 2 x 2 x 2 between-subject factorial design on WTP, we found that consumers' WTPs were more positive when cost attributes were not included in the product information(M = 5157.2) than when cost attributes were included in the product information(M = 4481.6; F = 33.877, df = 1, p < .001). In addition, consumers' WTPs were more positive in high cognitive load condition(M = 5482.6) than in low cognitive load condition(M = 4178.5; F = 134.014, df = 1, p < .001). More importantly, interaction between mood, product information, and cognitive load interaction was significant(F = 23.752, df = 1, p < .001). Contrast analysis supported our predictions. When cognitive load was high, mood and product information had no impact on the WTPs(all, p > .1). However, when cognitive load was low, the findings from Study 1 were replicated. When cost attributes were included in the product information, consumers in the positive mood condition(M = 3034.6) had lower WTPs of unhealthy food than consumers in the neutral mood condition(M = 4092.8; F = 20.187, df = 1, p < .001). However, when cost attributes weren't included in the product information, consumers in the positive mood condition(M = 5263) had higher WTPs of unhealthy food than consumers in the neutral mood condition(M = 4216.6; F = 21.623, df = 1, p < .001). The results of this research show that the impact of positive mood on self-control varied with the AE/AR mechanism. Furthermore, this research provides academic and practical implications.
Andrade, E. B. (2005). Behavioral consequences of affect: Combining evaluative and regulatory mechanisms. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 355-362.
Andrade, E. B., & Cohen, J. B. (2007). Affect-based evaluation and regulation as mediators of behavior: The role of affect in risk taking, helping and eating patterns. Do emotions help or hurt decision making.
Baumeister, R. F., & Heatherton, T. F. (1996). Self-regulation failure: An overview. Psychological Inquiry, 7(1), 1-15.
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation: Academic press.
Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion a cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), 331-345.
Bruner, G. C. (1990). Music, mood, and marketing. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 94-104.
Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., Martin, K. M., & Wright, J. L. (1996). Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Economics, 72,(1), 80-99.
Chernev, A., & Gal, D. (2010). Categorization effects in value judgments: Averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 738-747.
Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., Garvin, E., & Forgas, J. P. (2001). Affect as information. Handbook of affect and social cognition, 121-144.
Coker, B. L. S., Ashill, N. J., & Hope, B. (2011). Measuring internet product purchase risk. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1130- 1151.
Cools, J., Schotte, D. E., & McNally, R. J. (1992). Emotional arousal and overeating in restrained eaters. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(2), 348.
Fedorikhin, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2010). Positive mood and resistance to temptation: The interfering influence of elevated arousal. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), 698-711.
Fishbach, A., & Labroo, A. A. (2007). Be better or be merry: how mood affects self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 158.
Gardner, M. P., Wansink, B., Kim, J., & Park, S. B. (2014). Better moods for better eating? How mood influences food choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 320-335.
Gaston-Breton, C., & Duque, L. C. (2015). Utilitarian and hedonic promotional appeals of 99-ending prices: The influence of decision-making style. European Journal of Marketing, 49(1/2), 212-237.
Garg, N., Wansink, B., & Inman, J. J. (2007). The influence of incidental affect on consumers' food intake. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 194-206.
Gervey, B., Igou, E. R., & Trope, Y. (2005). Positive mood and future-oriented self-evaluation. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 267-294.
Goldstone, R. L., Medin, D. L., & Gentner, D. (1991). Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments. Cognitive psychology, 23(2), 222-262.
Gorn, G., Pham, M. T., & Sin, L. Y. (2001). When arousal influences ad evaluation and valence does not (and vice versa). Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 43-55.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271.
Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247-257.
Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). General evaluability theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 343-355.
Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Wang, L., & Zhang, S. (2013). Magnitude, time, and risk differ similarly between joint and single evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 172-184.
Isen, A. M., & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(2), 145-154.
Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259-266.
Kivetz, R., & Keinan, A. (2006). Repenting hyperopia: An analysis of self-control regrets. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 273-282.
Krüger, T., Mata, A., & Ihmels, M. (2014). The Presenter's Paradox Revisited: An Evaluation Mode Account. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1127-1136.
Krishnamurthy, P., & Prokopec, S. (2010). Resisting that triple-chocolate cake: Mental budgets and self-control. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 68-79.
Labroo, A. A., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 800-809.
Loureiro, Y. K., & Haws, K. L. (2015). Positive Affect and Malleable Mental Accounting: An Investigation of the Role of Positive Affect in Flexible Expense Categorization and Spending. Psychology & Marketing, 32(6), 670-677.
Lynch Jr, J. G., Marmorstein, H., & Weigold, M. F. (1988). Choices from sets including remembered brands: Use of recalled attributes and prior overall evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 169-184.
Macht, M., Roth, S., & Ellgring, H. (2002). Chocolate eating in healthy men during experimentally induced sadness and joy. Appetite, 39(2), 147-158.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. Psychological review, 106(1), 3-19.
Nagpal, A., Khare, A., Chowdhury, T., Labrecque, L. I., & Pandit, A. (2011). The impact of the amount of available information on decision delay: The role of common features. Marketing Letters, 22(4), 405-421.
Patel, K. A., & Schlundt, D. (2001). Impact of moods and social context on eating behavior. Appetite, 36(2), 111-118.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Pyone, J. S., & Isen, A. M. (2011). Positive affect, intertemporal choice, and levels of thinking: Increasing consumers' willingness to wait. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 532-543.
Rook, D. W., & Gardner, M. P. (1993). In the mood: Impulse buying’s affective antecedents. Research in Consumer Behavior, 6(7), 1-28.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Happy but mindless? Mood effects on problem solving and persuasion. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, 2, 527-561.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513-523.
Sherman, E., Mathur, A., & Smith, R. B. (1997). Store environment and consumer purchase behavior: mediating role of consumer emotions. Psychology & Marketing, 14(4), 361-378.
Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 278-292.
Siemer, M., & Reisenzein, R. (1998). Effects of mood on evaluative judgements: Influence of reduced processing capacity and mood salience. Cognition & Emotion, 12(6), 783-805.
Trope, Y., & Neter, E. (1994). Reconciling competing motives in self-evaluation: the role of self-control in feedback seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 646-657.
Trudel, R., & Murray, K. B. (2011). Why didn't I think of that? Self-regulation through selective information processing. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(4), 701-712.
Trudel, R., & Murray, K. B. (2013). Self-regulatory strength amplification through selective information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1), 61-73.
Vohs, K. D., & Faber, R. J. (2007). Spent resources: Self-regulatory resource availability affects impulse buying. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 537-547.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206.