바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

유명인 광고모델의 아름다움이 이들의 비도덕적 행동에 대한 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향

The influence of attractiveness on consumer responses toward celebrity endorsers who have engaged in immoral behavior

초록

본 연구에서는 비도덕적 행동을 저지른 광고모델에 대한 소비자 반응을 규명하고자 하였다. 구체적으로, 본 연구에서는 광고모델의 아름다움에 따라 해당 광고모델에 대한 소비자 반응이 달라질 수 있으며, 이러한 효과는 개인적 특성인 사회비교경향성에 따라 조절될 수 있음을 제안하였다. 제안한 가설을 검정하기 위하여 음주운전이라는 비도덕적 행동을 저지른 광고모델의 아름다움이 사건의 심각성 지각과 전문성 지각에 유의한 영향을 미치는지 알아보았다. 분석 결과, 광고모델이 비매력적인 경우보다 매력적인 경우에 해당 광고모델의 전문성을 더 낮게 지각하였으며, 이러한 광고모델의 전문성 지각은 광고모델태도에 유의한 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 사회비교경향성이 높은 소비자의 경우 광고모델의 외모가 전문성 지각에 미치는 영향이 더 크게 나타났다. 다만, 사건의 심각성 지각의 경우 광고모델의 외모에 따른 차이가 나타나지 않았는데, 이는 심각성이 낮게 인지된 음주운전을 대상으로 연구를 진행했기 때문인 것으로 보인다. 본 연구는 광고모델에 대한 부정적 정보에 대한 소비자 반응 관련 연구를 확장하여, 광고모델의 아름다움이나 사회비교경향성에 따라 해당 사건에 대한 소비자 반응이 달라질 수 있음을 보였다. 이러한 연구 결과는 실무적으로 유명인 광고모델과 관련된 실질적 시사점을 제공할 것으로 기대한다.

keywords
the attractiveness of a celebrity endorser, severity of immoral behavior, expertise, social comparison orientation, attitude toward a celebrity endorser, 광고모델의 아름다움, 사건의 심각성, 광고모델의 전문성, 사회비교경향성, 광고모델에 대한 태도

Abstract

This research aims to verify consumer responses toward celebrity endorsers who have engaged in immoral behavior. Specifically, this research suggested that the attractiveness of the celebrity endorser would influence consumer responses toward him or her, and this influence would be moderated by consumers’ social comparison orientation as a personal trait. To verify the suggested hypotheses, an experiment was conducted. Through the analyses, it was found that when the endorser was attractive, consumers perceived the expertise of the endorser as lower in comparison to a non-attractive endorser. Also, this pattern was more pronounced for consumers with a high level of social comparison orientation. This research expanded the research scope to include negative information on celebrity endorsers, and suggested that the beauty of the celebrity endorser was an antecedent and social comparison orientation was a moderator. It is expected that the findings of this research can have practical implications for marketers.

keywords
the attractiveness of a celebrity endorser, severity of immoral behavior, expertise, social comparison orientation, attitude toward a celebrity endorser

참고문헌

1.

김영조 (2014). 광고모델이 제품평가에 미치는 영향 색상의 역할. 마케팅관리연구, 19(1), 65-75.

2.

안희경, 하영원 (2001). 기업브랜드 스테레오타입에 일치하지 않는 정보가 스테레오타입의 변화에 미치는 영향. 마케팅연구, 16 (1), 109-134.

3.

전성률, 주태욱, 전호준 (2009). 브랜드 위기 상황에서 책임규명 정보의 주체가 소비자의 브랜드 태도 변화에 미치는 영향. 마케팅연구, 24(2), 81-108.

4.

정병욱, 김영조 (2014). 매력적인 광고모델이 제품평가에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 15(1), 145-156.

5.

Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 1-16.

6.

Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 73-93.

7.

Antioco, M., Smeesters, D., & Le Boedec, A. (2012). Take Your Pick: Kate Moss or the Girl Next Door?. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 15-30.

8.

Bartz, S., Molchanov, A., & Stork, P. A. (2013). When a celebrity endorser is disgraced: A twenty-five-year event study. Marketing Letters, 24(2), 131-141.

9.

Bhattacharjee, A., Berman, J. Z., & Reed, A. (2013). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167-1184.

10.

Bower, A. B. (2001). Highly attractive models in advertising and the women who loathe them: The implications of negative affect for spokesperson effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 51-63.

11.

Bower, A. B., & Landreth, S. (2001). Is beauty best? Highly versus normally attractive models in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 1-12.

12.

Bry, C., Follenfant, A., & Meyer, T. (2008). Blonde like me: When self-construals moderate stereotype priming effects on intellectual performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 751-757.

13.

Buunk, A. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2011). Does attractiveness sell? Women's attitude toward a product as a function of model attractiveness, gender priming, and social comparison orientation. Psychology & Marketing, 28(9), 958-973.

14.

Carrillat, F. A., d'Astous, A., & Christianis, H. (2014). Guilty by association: The perils of celebrity endorsement for endorsed brands and their direct competitors. Psychology & Marketing, 31(11), 1024-1039.

15.

Carrillat, F. A., d'Astous, A., & Lazure, J. (2013). For better, for worse?. Journal of Advertising Research, 53(1), 15-30.

16.

Choi, S. M., Lee, W. N., & Kim, H. J. (2005). Lessons from the rich and famous: A cross- cultural comparison of celebrity endorsement in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 85-98.

17.

D'Alessandro, S., & Chitty, B. (2011). Real or relevant beauty? Body shape and endorser effects on brand attitude and body image. Psychology & Marketing, 28(8), 843-878.

18.

Doorley, K., & Sierminska, E. (2012). Myth or fact? The beauty premium across the wage distribution. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6674. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract= 2101941.

19.

Elberse, A., & Verleun, J. (2012). The economic value of celebrity endorsements. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(2), 149-165.

20.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140.

21.

Fisher, R. J., & Ma, Y. (2014). The price of being beautiful: Negative effects of attractiveness on empathy for children in need. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 436-450.

22.

Fong, C. P., & Wyer, R. S. (2012). Consumers’ reactions to a celebrity endorser scandal. Psychology & Marketing, 29(11), 885-896.

23.

Forehand, M. R., & Perkins, A. (2005). Implicit assimilation and explicit contrast: A set/reset model of response to celebrity voice-overs. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 435-441.

24.

Franklin, R. G., & Adams, R. B. (2010). The two sides of beauty: laterality and the duality of facial attractiveness. Brain and cognition, 72(2), 300-305.

25.

Gibbons, F. X., & Buunk, B. P. (1999). Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 129-142.

26.

Griffin, A. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2006). Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: Is beauty good or is ugly bad?. Social Cognition, 24(2), 187-206.

27.

Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635-650.

28.

Hung, K., Chan, K. W., & Tse, C. H. (2011). Assessing celebrity endorsement effects in China: A consumer-celebrity relational approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(4), 608-623.

29.

Janssen, D. M., & Paas, L. J. (2014). Moderately thin advertising models are optimal, most of the time: Moderating the quadratic effect of model body size on ad attitude by fashion leadership. Marketing Letters, 25(2), 167-177.

30.

Jenq, C., Pan, J., & Theseira, W. (2015). Beauty, weight, and skin color in charitable giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 119, 234-253.

31.

Johnson, S. K., Sitzmann, T., & Nguyen, A. T. (2014). Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful: Acknowledging appearance mitigates the “beauty is beastly” effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(2), 184-192.

32.

Kang, Y. S., & Herr, P. M. (2006). Beauty and the beholder: Toward an integrative model of communication source effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 123-130.

33.

Keel, A., & Nataraajan, R. (2012). Celebrity endorsements and beyond: New avenues for celebrity branding. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 690-703.

34.

Lee, J. S., Kwak, D. H., & Moore, D. (2015). Athletes’ transgressions and sponsor evaluations: A focus on consumers’ moral reasoning strategies. Journal of Sport Management, 29(6), 672-687.

35.

Lee, S., Pitesa, M., Pillutla, M., & Thau, S. (2015). When beauty helps and when it hurts: An organizational context model of attractiveness discrimination in selection decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 15-28.

36.

Louie, T. A., Kulik, R. L., & Jacobson, R. (2001). When bad things happen to the endorsers of good products. Marketing Letters, 12(1), 13-23.

37.

McCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 310-321.

38.

Morse, S., & Gergen, K. J. (1970). Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(1), 148-156.

39.

O’Connor, K. M., & Gladstone, E. (2017). Beauty and social capital: Being attractive shapes social networks. Social Networks. in press.

40.

Praxmarer, S. (2011). How a presenter’s perceived attractiveness affects persuasion for attractiveness-unrelated products. International Journal of Advertising, 30(5), 839-865.

41.

Richins, M. L. (1991). Social comparison and the idealized images of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 71-83.

42.

Rydell, R. J., McConnell, A. R., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Multiple social identities and stereotype threat: imbalance, accessibility, and working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 949-966.

43.

Sherman, J. W., Stroessner, S. J., Conrey, F. R., & Azam, O. A. (2005). Prejudice and stereotype maintenance processes: attention, attribution, and individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 607-622.

44.

Thwaites, D., Lowe, B., Monkhouse, L. L., & Barnes, B. R. (2012). The impact of negative publicity on celebrity ad endorsements. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 663-673.

45.

Till, B. D., & Shimp, T. A. (1998). Endorsers in advertising: The case of negative celebrity information. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 67- 82.

46.

Trampe, D., Stapel, D. A., Siero, F. W., & Mulder, H. (2010). Beauty as a tool: The effect of model attractiveness, product relevance, and elaboration likelihood on advertising effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 27(12), 1101-1121.

47.

Tripp, C., Jensen, T. D., & Carlson, L. (1994). The effects of multiple product endorsements by celebrities on consumers' attitudes and intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 535-547.

48.

White, D. W., Goddard, L., & Wilbur, N. (2009). The effects of negative information transference in the celebrity endorsement relationship. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(4), 322-335.

49.

Wolbring, T., & Riordan, P. (2016). How beauty works. Theoretical mechanisms and two empirical applications on students' evaluation of teaching. Social Science Research, 57, 253-272.

50.

Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231- 248.

51.

Wyer, R. S. (Ed.). (2013). Stereotype activation and inhibition: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 11). Psychology Press.

52.

Zhou, L., & Whitla, P. (2013). How negative celebrity publicity influences consumer attitudes: The mediating role of moral reputation. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1013-1020.

logo