바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

논문 상세

심적 시뮬레이션(mental simulation)이 자기통제(self-control)에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

The Effect of Mental Simulation on Self - Control

초록

자아통제는 자신의 장기적인 목표를 달성하는 데 방해되는 행동을 억제하는 것을 의미한다. 개인에 따라 지니고 있는 자아통제 역량은 차이가 존재한다. 본 연구에서는 자아통제 상황에서 자아통제력이 높은 사람들의 활용하는 생각하는 방법에 대하여 살펴보고자 하였다. 구체적인 생각하는 방법으로 결과중심과 과정중심으로 구분되는 심적 시뮬레이션에 주목하였다. 본 연구에서는 자아통제 상황에서 자아통제력이 높은 사람일수록 과정중심 심적 시뮬레이션보다 결과중심 심적 시뮬레이션을 더 할 것으로 예상하였다. 그리고 자아통제가 요구되는 상황에서 결과중심 심적 시뮬레이션을 활성화 시키는 것이 과정중심 심적 시뮬레이션을 활성화 시키는 것보다 자아통제에 더 효과적일 것으로 예상하였다. 또한 심적 시뮬레이션이 자아통제에 미치는 영향을 예상된 후회가 매개할 것으로 예상하였다. 이를 검증하기 위하여 3번의 실험연구를 실시하였다. 연구 1에서는 개인의 자아통제력과 자아통제 상황에서 활용하는 심적 시뮬레이션 유형 사이의 관계를 살펴보았다. 개인의 자아통제력을 측정하고 자아통제 상황에서 활용하는 심적 시뮬레이션 유형을 측정하였다. 연구결과, 자아통제력이 높을수록 결과중심 심적 시뮬레이션을 과정중심 심적 시뮬레이션보다 더 활용하는 것으로 나타났다. 실험 2와 3에서는 조작에 의해 활성화된 심적 시뮬레이션이 자아통제에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 실험 설계는 2(심적 시뮬레이션 유형: 결과중심 vs. 과정중심)의 집단 간 실험설계 하였다. 실험 2에서는 자아통제 상황과 관련 없는 과업을 통해 참가자의 심적 시뮬레이션을 조작하였고, 실험 3에서는 자아통제 상황과 연결하여 참가자의 심적 시뮬레이션을 조작하였다. 연구 결과, 결과중심 심적 시뮬레이션 집단이 과정중심 심적 시뮬레이션 집단보다 자아통제를 더 잘하는 것으로 나타났고, 예상된 후회가 이를 매개하는 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
self control, self control ability, mental simulation, mind set, anticipated regret, 자아통제, 자아통제력, 심적 시뮬레이션, 사고방식, 예상된 후회

Abstract

Self-control refer to restraining behavior that interferes with individuals from achieving their long-term goals. Individuals have different self-control ability. This study investigates the mind set of individuals with high self-control ability in the context of self-control dilemma, especially focusing on mental simulation (Outcome-focused vs. Process-focused). We predicted that in self-control dilemma, individuals with high self-control might more likely utilize Outcome-focused mental simulation for self-control than Process-focused mental simulation, and activated Outcome-focused mental simulation might be more effective on self-control than activated Process-focused mental simulation. In addition, we predicted anticipated regret might mediate the effect of mental simulation on self-control. To test hypotheses, this study conducted 3 experiments. In Experiment 1, we examined the relation between individuals’ self-control level and types of mental simulation to utilize in self-control dilemma. Results showed that high self-control individuals used more Outcome-focused mental simulation than Process-focused. In Experiment 2 and 3, we examined the effect of mental simulation on self-control with between subject design(mental simulation: Outcome vs. Process focused). We manipulated participants’ mental simulation type in Experiment 2 with unrelated task with self-control dilemma and in Experiment 3 with related task. As we predicted, individuals activating Outcome-focused mental simulation did better self-control than Process-focused. and we found out the mediating effect of anticipated regret.

keywords
self control, self control ability, mental simulation, mind set, anticipated regret

참고문헌

1.

권익현, 이진석 (2012). 심적 시뮬레이션의 활용 유형에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 개인 특성과 과업 특성에 의한 차이를중심으로. 소비자학연구, 23(4), 261-285.

2.

김재휘, 설하린 (2014). 자기조절자원의 소진이자기통제에 미치는 효과. 한국심리학회지:소비자․광고, 15(1), 157-170.

3.

민수홍 (2006). 청소년의 자기통제력이 비행과범죄에 미치는 영향; 패널자료를 이용한인과성 및 일반성 검증. 청소년학연구, 13(6), 27-47.

4.

박경애, 김희수, 이화자, 김옥희 (2009). 가족과개인변인이 청소년의 인터넷 중독에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 41-51.

5.

이성수 (2009). 소비자 의사결정에서 사전가정사고와 예상된 후회의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 10(1), 147-166.

6.

주우진, 황희중 (2008). 후회경험과 예상후회가구매의사결정에 미치는 영향: 후회의 감정을 최소화하기 위한 소비자의 의사결정고려요인과 거래경험의 조절적 역할을 중심으로. 소비자학연구, 19(2), 215-246.

7.

한미영, 김재휘 (2008). 예상되는 후회와 자기효능감이 매몰비용 오류 행동에 미치는영향. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27(3), 695-709.

8.

Ackerman, J. M., N. J. Goldstein, J. R. Shapiro and J. A. Bargh (2009). You wear me out:The vicarious depletion of self-control. Psychological Science, 20, 326-332.

9.

Addis, D. R., A. T. Wong and D. L. Schacter (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1363-1377.

10.

Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

11.

Baumeister, R. F. and K. D. Vohs (2005). Handbook of self-regulation research. New York:Guilford.

12.

Baumeister, R. F., and K. D. Vohs (2007). Self-Regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 115-128.

13.

Bembemutty, H. and S. A. Karabenick (1998). Academic delay of gratification. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(4), 329-346.

14.

Bembemutty, H. and S. A. Karabenick (2004).Inherent association between academic delay of gratification, future time perspective, and self-regulated learning: Effects of time perspective on student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 35-57.

15.

Boyer, P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 219-224.

16.

Cooke, A. J., T. Meyvis and A. Schwartz (2001). Avoiding future regret in purchase timing decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 447-459.

17.

Ein-Gar, D., J. Goldenberg and L. Sagiv (2012). The role of consumer self-control in the consumption of virtue products. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(2), 123-133.

18.

Escalas, J. E. and M. F. Luce (2003). Process versus outcome thought focus and advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 246-254.

19.

Escalas, J. E. and M. F. Luce (2004). Understanding the effects of process-focused vs. outcome-focused thought in response to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 274-285.

20.

Fishbach, A., R. S. Friedman and A. W. Kruglanski (2003). Leading us not into temptation: momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 296-309.

21.

Fishbach, A. and Y. Zhang (2008). Together or apart: when goals and temptations complement versus compete. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 547-559.

22.

Freitas, A. L., P. M. Gollwitzer and Y. Trope (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mind sets on anticipating and guiding others’self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739-752.

23.

Fujita, K., Y. Trope, N. Liberman and M. Levin-Sagi (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351-367.

24.

Gilbert, D. T. and T. D. Wilson (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future, Science, 317, 1351-1354.

25.

Goerke, M., J. Möller, S. Schulz-Hardt, U. Napiersky and D. Frey (2004). “It's not my faults-but only I can change it”:counterfactual and prefactual thoughts of managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 279-292.

26.

Grasmick, H., C. Tittle, R. Bursick and B. Arneklev (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of gottfredson and hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.

27.

Hayes, A. F (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling, Manuscript submitted for publication.

28.

Hofmann, W., M. Friese and F. Strack (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162-176.

29.

Inman, J. J. (2007). Regret regulation:Disentangling self-reproach from learning.Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 19-24.

30.

Kanfer, F. H. (1977) The many faces of self-control, or behavior modification changes its focus, in P. B. Stuart(Ed.), Behavior Self-Management, NY:Brunner/Mazel, 1-48.

31.

Leventhal, H. and L. Cameron (1987). Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Education and Counseling, 10, 117-138.

32.

Macrae, C. N., B. M. Christian, M. Golubickis, M. Karanasiou, L. Troksiarova, D. L. McNamara, and L. K. Miles (2014). When do I wear me out? Mental simulation and the diminution of self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143(4), 1755-1764.

33.

McCullough, Michael E. and B. L. B. Willoughby (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and selfcontrol:Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69-93.

34.

Mukhopadhyay, A., J. Sengupta, and S. Ramanathan (2008). Recalling past temptations: An information processing perspective on the dynamics of self control. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 586-599.

35.

Oettingen, G. and D. Mayer (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1198-1212.

36.

Pham, L. B. and S. E. Taylor (1999) From thought to action: Effects of process versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 250-260.

37.

Suddendorf, T., and M. C. Corballis (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to humans?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 299-313.

38.

Taylor, S. E. and S. K. Schneider (1989). Coping and the simulation of events. Social Cognition, 7(2), 174-184.

39.

Taylor, S. E., L. B. Pham, I. D. Rivkin and D. A. Armor (1998). Harnessing the imagination:Mental simulation, self-regulation and coping. American Psychologist, 53(2), 429-439.

40.

Thompson, D. V., R. W. Hamilton and P. K. Petrova (2009). When mental simulation hinders behaviors: The effects of processoriented thinking on decision difficulty and performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 562-574.

41.

Trope, Y., and A. Fishbach (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(4), 493-506.

42.

Wertenbroch, Klaus (1998). Consumption selfcontrol by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17(4), 317-337.

43.

Sheth, J. N. and A. Parvatlyar (1995). Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 23(4), 255-271.

44.

Zhao, M., S. Hoeffler & G. Zauberman (2007). Mental simulation and preference consistency over time: The role of process versus outcome-focused. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 379-388.

45.

Zeelenberg, M. and R. Pieters (2007). A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.1. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(1), 29-35.

46.

Zeelenberg, M., W. W. van Dijk, J. Van der Pligt, A. S. R. Manstead, P. Van Empelen and D. Reinderman (1998). Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 117-141.

logo