바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

메뉴

The Role of Account Justificableness in Mental Accounting

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to verify the impact of the expenditure category itself's justification on the consumer's willingness to spend. Results indicated that when expenditure cannot be justified with the remaining budget of the expenditure account, justificableness of expenditure category affected consumer's willingness to spend. It was also shown that individuals with higher frugality are more willing to spend for expenditure that are related to more justifiable category. Finally, when a expenditure could be interpreted to two expenditure categories, consumers showed willingness to spend to interpret the expenditure as a more related to justifiable expenditure category. Implications, limitations, possible future studies were discussed.

keywords
mental accounting, justification, frugality, motivated reasoning

Reference

1.

권미화, 이기춘 (2000). 청소년소비자의 소비행동의 합리성에 영향을 미치는 요인. 한국가정관리학회지, 18(2), 175-190.

2.

임수진, 이정욱 (2005). 교육용 보드게임 개발 사례에 관한 연구. 어린이미디어연구, 4, 205-221.

3.

Bove, L. L., Nagpal, A., Dorsett, A. D. S., 2009. Exploring the determinants of the frugal shopper. J. Retailing Consum. Serv, 16(4), 291- 297.

4.

Cheema, A., & Soman, D. (2006). Malleable mental accounting: The effect of flexibility on the justification of attractive spending and consumption decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology,16(1),33-44. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6

5.

Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718

6.

Feick, L. F., & Price, L. L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 83-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251146

7.

Goldsmith, R., Reinecke Flynn, L., & Clark, R. (2014). The etiology of the frugal consumer. Journal Of Retailing And Consumer Services, 21(2), 175-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2013. 11.005

8.

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

9.

Heath, C., & Soll, J. B. (1996). Mental budgeting and consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(1), 40-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209465

10.

Hossain, M. T. (2018). How Cognitive Style Influences the Mental Accounting System: Role of Analytic versus Holistic Thinking. Journal of Consumer Research, (March), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy020

11.

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480- 498.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

12.

Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Hughner, R. S., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85-98.

13.

Loureiro, Y., & Haws, K. (2015). Positive Affect and Malleable Mental Accounting: An Investigation of the Role of Positive Affect in Flexible Expense Categorization and Spending. Psychology & Marketing, 32(6), 670-677. doi: 10.1002/mar.20808

14.

Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. (1), 113-131.

15.

Okada, E. M. (2005). Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(1), 4353 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.42.1.43.56889

16.

Shefrin, H. and R. H. Thaler (1988). “The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis,” Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609-643.

17.

Thaler, R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214. doi: 10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

18.

Thaler, R. H., A. Tverskey, D. Kahneman, and A. Schwartz (1997). The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: an Experimental Test, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 647-661.

19.

Thaler, R. H., Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Mental Accounting Matters. Choices, Values, and Frames, 206(September 1998), 241- 268. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3<183::AID-BDM318>3.0.CO;2-F

20.

Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To Do or to Have? That Is the Question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193-1202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1193

21.

Shafir, E., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition, 49(1-2), 11-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-S

logo