바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

한국심리학회지:학교

아동 인지능력 평가의 최근 동향: CHC이론과 K-WISC-Ⅳ

Recent Trends in Cognitive Assessment for Children: CHC Theory and K-WISC-Ⅳ

초록

이 논문의 목적은 아동 인지능력 평가의 최근 동향을 논하는 것으로 Cattell-Horn-Carroll(CHC)이론과 K-WISC-Ⅳ를 중점적으로 다루었다. 동시대에 가장 영향력있는 심리측정이론인 CHC이론은 최근 10년 사이 여러 지능검사 개발에 이론적 틀을 제공하였고 교차배터리평가법(cross-battery assessment) 발달에 초석이 되었다. 다시 말해서, CHC이론은 지능검사의 개발, 실시 및 해석에서 이론과 실제의 간격을 좁히는데 기여해왔다. 이러한 CHC이론은 전판과 비교해서 혁신적인 변화를 선보인 WISC 최신 개정판을 이해하는데 매우 중요하다. 많은 기대와 관심 속에서 출판된 K-WISC-Ⅳ는 도구의 이론적 토대 업데이트, 발달적 적합성의 증가, 심리측정 속성의 향상, 검사자의 편의성 증대라는 네 가지 개정목표를 갖고 있다. 이 논문에서는 CHC이론과 일반적인 검사개발기준에 비추어 개정목표별로 K-WISC-Ⅳ의 장단점을 평가하였다. 더불어, 이 검사의 실시와 해석 그리고 향후 연구를 위한 제언을 제공하였다.

keywords
지능검사, 인지능력, 인지평가, CHC, WISC, Intelligence test, Cognitive abilities, Cognitive assessment, CHC, WISC, Intelligence test, Cognitive abilities, Cognitive assessment, CHC, WISC

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss recent trends in the field of cognitive assessment for children with a focus on CHC theory and to review K-WISC-Ⅳ. CHC theory, which is the most influential psychometric theory of cognitive abilities in contemporary cognitive assessment, has provided a theoretical framework for several recently revised intelligence tests for children and has led to the development of cross-battery assessment. Stated differently, this theory has contributed to reducing the gap between theory and practice in terms of the development, administration, and interpretation of intelligence tests over the past decade. From the CHC perspective and based on standards for educational and psychological testing, we reviewed K-WISC-Ⅳ that has been published lately with four revision goals including update in theoretical foundations, increased developmental appropriateness, improved psychometric properties, and enhanced test convenience. We provided some suggestions about the administration and interpretation of K-WISC-Ⅳ, and discussed implications for future research in the area of child cognitive assessment.

keywords
지능검사, 인지능력, 인지평가, CHC, WISC, Intelligence test, Cognitive abilities, Cognitive assessment, CHC, WISC, Intelligence test, Cognitive abilities, Cognitive assessment, CHC, WISC

참고문헌

1.

곽금주, 박혜원, 김청택 (2001). K-WISC-Ⅲ. 서울: 도서출판 특수교육.

2.

곽금주, 오상우, 김청택 (2011a). Korean Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition(K- WISC-Ⅳ). 서울: 학지사서울심리검사연구소.

3.

곽금주, 오상우, 김청택 (2011b). Korean Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition(K- WISC-Ⅳ) 전문가 지침서. 서울: 학지사서울심리검사연구소.

4.

박현옥 (2005). Cattell-Horn-Carroll 지능이론에 대한 이론적 탐색. 발달장애학회지, 9(2), 29-45.

5.

이창우, 서봉연 (1974). K-WISC 실시요강. 서울

6.

한국교육개발원 (1991). KEDI-WISC. 서울: 도서출판 특수교육.

7.

Alfonso, V. C., Flanagan, D. P., & Radwan, S. (2005). The Impact of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory on Test Development and Interpretation of Cognitive and Academic Abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp.185-202). New York: Guilford Press.

8.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

9.

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Carroll, J. B. (2005). The Three-Stratum Theory of Cognitive Abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison(Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues(pp.69-76). New York: Guilford Press.

11.

Flanagan, D. P., Fiorello, C. A., & Ortiz, S. O. (2010). Enhancing practice through application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory and research: A “third method” approach to specific learning disability identification. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 739-760.

12.

Flanagan, D..P., & Kaufman, A. S. (2004). Essentials of WISC-Ⅳ assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

13.

Flanagan, D..P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment(2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

14.

Gustafsson, J. E. (1989). Broad and narrow abilities in research on learning and instruction. In R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerman, & R. Cudeck(Eds.), Abilities, motivations, and methodology: The Minesota Symposium on Learning and Individual Differences (pp.203-237). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

15.

Gustafsson, J. E. (2001). On the hierarchical structure of ability and personality. In J. M. Colis & S. Messick(Eds.), Intelligence and Personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement(pp.25-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

16.

Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.

17.

Horn, J. L. (1968). Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence. Psychological Review, 75, 242-259.

18.

Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for Better Understanding of Cognitive Abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp.41-68). New York: Guilford Press.

19.

Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57(5), 253-270.

20.

Kamphaus, R. W. (2001). Clinical assessment of child and adolescent intelligence(2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

21.

Kamphaus, R. W., Winsor, A. P., Rowe, E. W., & Kim, S. (2005). A history of intelligence test interpretation. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues(pp.23-38). New York: Guilford Press.

22.

Kaufman, A. S., & Lichtenberger, E. O. (2006). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence(3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley.

23.

Kaufman, A. S., Flanagan, D. P., Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. T. (2006). Test review: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, fourth edition(WISC-Ⅳ). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 278-295.

24.

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1993). Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

25.

Kaufman, A. S., Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

26.

Keith, T. Z., Fine, J. G., Taub, G. E., Reynolds, M. R., & Kranzler, J. H. (2006). High order, multisample, confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-fourth edition: What does it measure? School Psychology Review, 35, 108-127.

27.

Lecerf, T., Rossier, J., Favez, N., Reverte, L., & Coleaux, L. (2010). The four- vs. alternative six-factor structure of the French WISC-Ⅳ: Comparison using confirmatory factor analyses. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 69, 221-232.

28.

McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison(Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: theories, tests, and issues (pp.136-181). New York: Guilford Press.

29.

McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1-10.

30.

McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

31.

Molfese, V. J., DiLalla, L. F., & Bunce, D. (1997). Prediction of the intelligence test scores of 3- to 8-year-old children by home environment, socioeconomic status, and biomedical risks. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43(2), 219-234.

32.

Newton, J. H., & McGrew, K. S. (2010). Introduction to the special issue: Current research in Cattell-Horn-Carroll–based assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 621- 634.

33.

Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

34.

Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. London: Macmillan.

35.

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). The perceptual factor. Psychometrika, 3(1), 1-17.

36.

Vanderploeg, R. D., Schinka, J. A., Baum, K. M., Tremont, G., & Mittenberg, W. (1998). WISC-Ⅲ premorbid prediction strategies: Demographic and best performance approaches. Psychological Assessment, 10, 277-284.

37.

Wechsler, D. (2003a). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

38.

Wechsler, D. (2003b). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-Ⅳ) administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

39.

Wechsler, D. (2003c). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition(WISC-Ⅳ) technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

40.

Woodcock, R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations of the WJ—R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 231- 258.

41.

Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery- Revised: Tests of Cognitive Ability. Chicago: Riverside.

42.

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001a). Woodcock-Johnson Ⅲ Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca. IL: Riverside.

43.

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001b). Woodcock-Johnson Ⅲ Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ Ⅲ Cog) technical manual.. Itasca. IL: Riverside.

한국심리학회지:학교