Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1225-0163
  • E-ISSN 2288-8985

Comparison of recovery rates of DNPH-Cartridge sampler in the analysis of odorous carbonyl compounds

Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2010, v.23 no.5, pp.446-456
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2010.23.5.446



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

In this study, the performance characteristics of DNPH sampling were investigated in the collection and analysis of 5 carbonyl compounds (CC) in air using the cartridge products produced by three different makers. For these experiments, gaseous standards of 5 CCs were prepared to cover 9 concentration levels for each compound (33~2600 nmol). Some cartridge products exhibited relatively high blank values of acetaldehyde (AA) and propionaldehyde (PA). The recovery rates of all three cartridges showed moderate reduction as the molecular weight of CC increased. In addition, when the recovery rate was compared by percent error (%), the most stable patterns were achieved in the intermediate concentration range of 263~1312 nmol (in case of AA). The overall results of our study suggest that the optimal range of recovery for a given concentration range should be considered to obtain the most reliable data for the DNPH cartridge method.

keywords
DNPH cartridge, carbonyl compounds, recovery rate


Reference

1

1. “개정악취방지법” Korean Ministry of Environment (2008).

2

2. S. Uchiyama, Y. Inaba and N. Kunugita, J. Chromatogr. A, 6, 1-6(2010).

3

3. M. J. Fedoruk and B. D. Kerger, J. Expo. Anal. Environ Epidemiol., 13, 31-41(2003).

4

4. M. Onishi, Y. Sekine, K. Sugihara, K. Kitasaka and H. Shimajiri, J. Health Sci., 53(4), 413-422(2007).

5

5. J. O. Levin, R. Lindahi and K. Andersson, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., 39, 44-47(1989).

6

6. S. Uchiyama, E. Matsushima, H. Tokunaga, Y. Otsubo, M. Ando, J. Chromatogr. A, 1116, 165-171(2006)

7

7. D. Grosjean, Environ. Sci. Technol., 116, 254-262(1982).

8

8. K. Kuwata, M. Uebori, H. Yamasaki, Y. Kuge and Y. Kiso, Anal. Chem., 55, 2013-2016(1985).

9

9. T. Schmitz, D. Hassel and F. J. Weber, Atm. Environ., 34, 4639-4647(2000).

10

10. 조덕희, 송일석, 김인구, 김웅수, 김종보, 김태현, 황선민, 남우경, 대한위생학회지, 21(1), 35-43(2006).

11

11. R. Pal and K. H. Kim, Anal. Chim. Acta, 610, 289- 296(2008).

12

12. 정지연, 박승현, 이광용, 오세민, 한국산업위생학회지, 10(1), 126-147(2000).

13

13. M. Possanzini and V. D. Palo, Chromatogrphia, 46(5/6), 235-240(1997).

14

14. M. Possanzini, V. D. Palo and A. Cecinato, Atm. Environ., 37, 1309-1316(2003).

15

15. K. H. Kim, Y. J. Hong, R. Pal, E. C. Jeon, Y. S. Koo and S. W. Young, Chem., 70, 807-820(2008).

16

16. B. P. Andreini, R. Baroni, E. Galimberti and G. Sesana, Microchem. J., 67, 11-19(2000).

17

17. 홍원필, 임승민, 김기현, 이은희, 김윤신, 한국실내환경학회지, 7(3), 135-146(2010).

18

18. D. Sin and V. Jack, Respir. Crit. Care Med., 164(4), 580-584(2001).

19

19. “배출허용기준”, 환경부, 2007.

20

20. “악취공정시험방법”, 환경부, 2008.

상단으로 이동

Analytical Science and Technology