- P-ISSN 1225-0163
- E-ISSN 2288-8985
- P-ISSN1225-0163
- E-ISSN2288-8985
- SCOPUS, ESCI, KCI
Article Detail
Home > Article Detail
Method comparison for analyzing formaldehyde in marker pen ink
Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
2020, v.33 no.3, pp.115-124
https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2020.33.3.115
&
(2020). Method comparison for analyzing formaldehyde in marker pen ink. Analytical Science and Technology, 33(3), 115-124, https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2020.33.3.115
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Marker pens belong to school things that are controlled by the regulation system called safety confirmation under special act on the safety of products for children with the formaldehyde criteria of 20 mg/ kg. With nine marker pens available commercially, formaldehyde in marker pen ink was analyzed by present test standard where marking on a fabric swatch with a pen and extracting the swatch in water and derivatization with Nash reagent followed by UV/Vis spectrophotometeric measurement (Nash-UV/Vis method), giving not detected results or a false positive result in case of a colored water extract. However, the contents of formaldehyde in ink of nine marker pens were determinded to range between 3.2 ~ 93.2 mg/kg with three results above the safety criteria of 20 mg/kg by HPLC/DAD measurements on DNPH derivatives of formaldehyde (DNPH-HPLC/ DAD method) in ink dissolved directly in water using an ultrasonic bath. Therefore, the DNPH-HPLC/DAD method with the extraction of ultrasonic dissolving ink in water is proposed as a proper method for analyzing formaldehyde in ink. The proposed method has advantages of lower detection limit and accuracy with colored extracts as well as a simple and fast extraction. The accuracy and precision of this method was estimated to be 90.1 ~ 105.4 % and 0.6 ~ 3.3 %, respectively by spiking tests in the ranges of 20 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg using matrixes such as highlighter pen ink, board marker ink, chalk marker pen ink and painter marker ink.
- keywords
- Formaldehyde, marker pen ink, safety criteria, Nash-UV/VIS, DNPH-HPLC/DAD
Reference
1
1. ‘전기용품 및 생활용품 안전관리법 가이드북’, http://www.motie.go.kr/motie/ne/Notice/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_cd_n=83&cate_n=1&bbs_seq_n=4474826, Assessed 25October 2019.
2
2. ‘Product Safety Control System’, http://kats.go.kr/content. do?cmsid=37, Assessed 25 October 2019.
3
3. ‘Consumer Products’, http://kats.go.kr/content.do?cmsid =49, Assessed 25 October 2019.
4
4. ‘Children’s Products‘, http://kats.go.kr/content.do?cmsid =496, Assessed 25 October 2019.
5
5. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards ‘국가기술표준원 고시 제2017-14호(2017.1.26), 전기용품및 생활용품 안전관리 운용요령’, Republic of Korea.
6
6. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy ‘산업통상자원부 고시 제2017-18호(2017.1.31), 어린이제품 공통안전기준’, Republic of Korea.
7
7. Ministry of Environment ‘환경부 고시 제2016-199호(2016.10.12), 어린이용품 환경유해인자 사용제한 등에 관한 규정’, Republic of Korea.
8
8. Ministry of Environment ‘Act No.11789 (22 May 2013), Act on the Registration and Evaluation, etc. of Chemical Substances’, Republic of Korea.
9
9. Ministry of Environment ‘Act No.15511 (3 March 2018), 생활화학제품 및 살생물제의 안전관리에 관한 법률’Republic of Korea.
10
10. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety ‘식품의약품안전처 고시 제2019-27호, 화장품 안전기준 등에 관한 규정’ Republic of Korea.
11
11. Ministry of Environment ‘Act No.14837 (18 April 2017), Hygiene Products Control Act’ Republic of Korea.
12
12. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards ‘어린이제품 안전확인 안전기준 부속서 Annex 11 (School thing) (2017.1.31)’ Republic of Korea.
13
13. R. L. Brunelle and K. R. Crawford, ‘Advances in the Forensic Analysis and Dating of Writing Ink’, Charles C Thamas Publisher Ltd., Springfield, USA, 31 (2003).
14
14. S. Everts, C&EN, 94(33), 24-26, 2016.
15
15. M. Ash and I. Ash, ‘Handbook of Preservatives’, Synapse Information Resources Inc., Endicott, NY, USA, 6(2004).
16
16. T. Saitoh, K. Taguchi and M. Hiraide, Anal. Sci., 18, 1267-1268 (2002).
17
17. Y.-M. Jeon, Y.-K. Kim and H.-M. Choi, AATCC Review., 10(6), 46-50 (2010).
18
18. Y.-J. Hong and K.-H. Kim, Anal. Sci. Technol., 18(1), 43-50 (2005).
19
19. A. Salvador and A. Chisvert, ‘Analysis of Cosmetic Products’, 2nd ed., Elsevier B.V. Cambridge, USA, 76, 2018.
20
20. J-P. Kim, S.-S. Park and M.-S. Bae, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 34(4), 616-624 (2018).
21
21. ‘GB/T 19941-2005, Leather and fur-Chemical tests-Determination of formaldehyde content’, 2005.
22
22. ‘SO/TS 17226:2003, Leather-Chemical tests-Determination of formaldehyde content in leather’, 2003.
23
23. ‘B/T 2912.3-2009, Textiles-Determination of formaldehyde-Part 3: High performance liquid chromatography method’, 2009.
24
24. K. S. Park, Y. D. Cho, E. K. Choe and Y. W. Lee, Proceedings of the 59th Biannual Conference of Korean Society of Analytical Sciences, 320 (2017).
25
25. D. A. Skoog, F. J. Holler and S. R. Crouch, ‘Principles of Instrumental Analysis’, 7th ed., Cengage Learning, Boston, USA, 2018.
26
26. ‘환경 시험·검사 QA/QC 핸드북’, 국립환경과학원, 2005.
27
27. I. Taverniers, M. De Loose and E. Van Bockstaele, Trends Anal. Chem., 23(8), 535-552 (2004).
Other articles from this issue
- Method comparison for analyzing formaldehyde in marker pen ink
- Screening and detection of methylisothiazolinone and chloromethylisothiazolinone in cosmetics by UPLC-MS/MS
- Study on simultaneous determination of aromatic material causing allergic in children’s products by GC-MSD
- A comparison study of crude protein contents obtained utilizing the Kjeldahl method and Dumas combustion method in foods
- Analysis of ethyl glucuronide (EtG) in Hair for the diagnosis of chronic alcohol abuse of Korean
- Comparison of vacuum metal deposition (VMD) and powder method for developing latent fingerprint on plastic envelope surface
- Erratum: Electrochemically polyaniline-coated microextraction needle for phthalates in water
- more
Recommanded Articles
This website recommended the use the Chrome browser for journal website.