Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1225-0163
  • E-ISSN 2288-8985

Article Contents

    Comparison of vacuum metal deposition (VMD) and powder method for developing latent fingerprint on plastic envelope surface

    Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
    2020, v.33 no.3, pp.159-166
    https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2020.33.3.159




    • Downloaded
    • Viewed

    Abstract

    Vacuum metal deposition (VMD) is effective to develop latent fingerprints on non-porous and semiporous surfaces. VMD can be used in cases when fingerprints that can not be developed by generalized techniques or deposited on difficult surfaces. The recommended surfaces for VMD techniques include vinyl, polymer bills, magnetic coated tickets, etc. In this study, the minimum amount of gold input was explored for developing fingerprints from at least 12 hours to up to 28 days after deposit fingerprint on the pink high density polyethylene envelope (HDPE) and low density polyethylene envelope (LDPE), which are mainly used as delivery envelopes. And the results were compared with the effects of black powder and fluorescent powder. In addition, delivery envelopes used for delivery were collected, then classified as HDPE and LDPE and pseudooperation test was performed. As a result, VMD method developed good quality of fingerprints.

    keywords
    vacuum metal deposition (VMD), high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), powder method


    Reference

    1

    1. P. Durussel, E. Stauffer, A. Becue, C. Champod and P. Margot, J. Forensic Ident., 59(1), 80-96 (2009).

    2

    2. N. Jones, M. Stoilovic, C. Lennard and C. Roux, Forensic Sci. Int., 115(1-2), 73-88 (2001).

    3

    3. N. Jones, D. Mansour, M. Stoilovic, C. Lennard and C. Roux, Forensic Sci. Int., 124(2-3), 167-177 (2001).

    4

    4. H. Grant, E. Springer and Z. Ziv, ‘Vacuum metal deposition inhibition on polythene bags. In: Almog J, Springer E, Eds., Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fingerprint Detection and Identification’, Hemed Press, 1996.

    5

    5. N. Jones, M. Stoilovic, C. Lennard and C. Roux, Forensic Sci. Int., 123, 5-12 (2001).

    6

    6. N. E. Masters and J. D. DeHaan, J. Forensic Ident., 46(1), 3245 (1996).

    7

    7. A. H. Misner, J. Forensic Ident., 42(1), 26-33 (1992).

    8

    8. G. W. Batey, J. Copeland, D. L. Donnelly, C. L. Hill, P. L. Laturnus, C. H. McDiarmid, K. J. Miller, A. H. Misner, A. Tario and A. B. Yamashita, J. Forensic Ident., 48(2), 165-175 (1998).

    9

    9. J. Flynn, M. Stoilovic and C. Lennard, J. Forensic Ident., 49(6), 594-612 (1999).

    10

    10. R. Ramotowski, ‘Lee and Gaensslen’s Advances in Fingerprint Technology’, 3rd Ed., CRC Press, 2013.

    11

    11. P. T. Stroud, ‘Some Comments on Finger Print Development by Vacuum Deposition’, AWRE report Nuclear Research Note, 5/71 (1971).

    12

    12. P. T. Stroud, ‘Further Comments on Finger Print Development by Vacuum Deposition’ AWRE report Nuclear Research Note, 10/72 (1972).

    13

    13. CAST ‘Fingerprint Source Book v2.0’, 2nd ed., CAST Publication, 2017.

    14

    14. CAST ‘Fingermark Visualisation Manual’, 1st ed., VMD.21, CAST Publication, 2014.

    상단으로 이동

    Analytical Science and Technology