Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1225-0163
  • E-ISSN 2288-8985

Article Contents

    A pilot application study of densitometric image analysis as a potential comparative evaluation method for visualized fingerprints

    Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
    2020, v.33 no.4, pp.197-202
    https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2020.33.4.197
    Eun-Ji Kim (Department of Scientific Criminal Investigation, Chungnam National University)
    Soo-Kyung Kim (Department of Scientific Criminal Investigation, Chungnam National University)
    Kyung-Suk Seo (Crime and Scientific Investigation Team, Chungnam Provincial Police Agency)
    Sung-Woon Choi (Graduate School of New Drug Discovery and Development, Chungnam National University)
    • Downloaded
    • Viewed

    Abstract

    The current comparison methods with scoring systems that are used to compare visualized latent fingerprints (LF) have disadvantages. Evaluators using these methods are prone to make errors and fail to discriminate LFs correctly to notice the differences among those LFs. Therefore, a comparative and quantitative evaluation method that is capable of obtaining more objective and quantitative results is needed. Densitometric image analysis (DIA) is used in other fields as a reliable semi-quantitative comparison method. To apply DIA to LFs, the potential variables that can occur during the DIA process were tested. The visualized ridges of LFs can be compared using the concentration of dots against the background to make it possible to analyze the ridges with DIA. The variables that can be present during the DIA process include the thickness of the analysis line, the number of ridges to be taken, the number of divided zones within each of the fingerprints, and the angles of the analysis line against the ridge lines that were selected. From the analysis of the inked fingerprints and circular lines that are similar to fingerprints, the angle of the analysis lines with the ridge line was the most significant variable. The preliminary test result was applied to the comparison of LFs that were developed with the powder method and then compared with the AFIS analysis. A similar trend was found, and a more detailed and semi-quantitative comparison of the visualized LFs was possible. In the future, it is necessary to check the evaluative ability of the DIA method by analyzing the visualized LFs with other various development methods. However, DIA is currently an option that can be used as an objective comparative evaluation method during fingerprint studies with supplementary role.

    keywords
    fingerprint comparison and evaluation method, densitometric image analysis


    Reference

    1

    1. M. Wang, M. Li, A. Yu, Y. Zhu, M. Yang and C. Mao, Adv. Funct. Mater., 27, 1606243 (2017).

    2

    2. B. Wilshire, Endeav., 20(1), 12-15 (1996).

    3

    3. T. A. Trozzi, R. L. Schwartz, M. L. Hollars, L. D. Leighton, Y. E. Trozzi and C. Wade, ‘Processing guide for developing latent prints’, Ed., FBI, USA, 2001.

    4

    4. H. C. Lee and R. E. Gaensslen, ‘Advances in fingerprint technology’, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, 2002.

    5

    5. V. G. Sears, S. M. Bleay, H. L. Bandey and V. J. Bowman, Sci. Justice, 52(3), 145-160 (2012).

    6

    6. S. Fieldhouse, Forensic Sci. Int., 207(1-3), 96-100 (2011).

    7

    7. Y. T. Oh, M. S. Park, S. H. Yu, M. S. Kim and J. S. Yu, J. Police Sci., 16(2), 179-217 (2016).

    8

    8. N. E. Jones, L. M. Davies, C. A. Russell, J, S. Brennan and S. K. Bramble, J. Forensic Indentif., 51(5), 504-515(2001).

    9

    9. B. T. Ulery, R. A. Hicklin, J. Buscaglia and M. A. Roberts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 108(19), 7733-7738 (2011).

    10

    10. T. P. Chen, X. Jiang and W. Y. Yau, IEEE, ICIP’04, 2, 1253-1256 (2004).

    11

    11. J. D. Humphreys, G. Porter and M. Bell, Forensic Sci. Int., 178(1), 46-53 (2008).

    12

    12. E. Lim, X. Jiang and W. Yau, IEEE, ICIP’02, 1, 469-472 (2002).

    13

    13. C. McLaren, C. Lennard and M. Stoilovic, J. Forensic Indentif., 60(2), 199-222 (2010).

    14

    14. C. Fairley, S. M. Bleay, V. G. Sears and N. Nic Daéid, Forensic Sci. Int., 217(1-3), 5-18 (2012).

    15

    15. H. L. Bandey and A. P. Gibson, ‘The Powders Process, Study 2: Evaluation of Fingerprint Powders on Smooth Surfaces’, Home Office Scientific Development Branch, 2006.

    16

    16. A. Becue, S. Moret, C. Champod and P. Margot, Forensic Sci. Int., 191(1-3), 36-41 (2009).

    17

    17. P. Fritz, A. Frick, W. Van Bronswijk, S. Lewis, A. Beaudoin, S. Bleay and C. Lennard, J. Forensic Indentif., 65(5), 851-867 (2015).

    18

    18. L. van Oeffelen, E. Peeters, P. N. Le Minh and D. Chariler, PloS one, 9(1), e85146 (2014).

    19

    19. D. Boros, A. Hunyadi, K. Veres and J. Hohmannm, J. Planar Chromatogr.-Mod. TLC, 25(6), 571-574 (2012).

    20

    20. N. Popovic and J. Sherma, Trends Chromatogr., 9, 21-28 (2014).

    21

    21. J. H. Cho, H. W. Kim, M. S. Kim and S. W. Choi, Anal. Sci. Technol., 29(3), 142-153 (2016).

    22

    22. D. E. Lee, Y. S. Ok, E. J. Kim, S. S. Park and S. W. Choi, Crim. Investig. Stud., 5(1), 127-140 (2019).

    상단으로 이동

    Analytical Science and Technology