Article Detail

Home > Article Detail
  • P-ISSN 1225-0163
  • E-ISSN 2288-8985

Article Contents

    Effectiveness of interference filter for photoluminescence observations: comparison with absorption filters

    Analytical Science and Technology / Analytical Science and Technology, (P)1225-0163; (E)2288-8985
    2021, v.34 no.5, pp.225-230
    https://doi.org/10.5806/AST.2021.34.5.225
    Wonyoung Lee (Graduate school of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang University)
    Duke Kim (Altligh)
    Jeseol Yu (Graduate school of Forensic Science, Soonchunhyang University)
    • Downloaded
    • Viewed

    Abstract

    Currently, most photoluminescence reagents used in forensic science have short stokes shift, making it difficult to observe strong photoluminescence due to scattering light from forensic light sources when using filters that are not shieldable. However interference filters can be observed near monochromatic light, making them a better alternative to absorption filters. To verify practical applicability of interference filters, interference filters and three other types of previously frequently used absorption filters were observed using a variety of light source products, and transmission light was cross-compared. Interference filters have a lower slope value than absorption filters, and selectively show only the photoluminescence of reagents, regardless of the type of product from the forensic light source. In addition, tilting the angle of the filter surface for observation lowered the λcut-on, which could replace various types of absorption filters with a single interference filter.

    keywords
    interference filter, absorption filters, photoluminescence, fingerprint, forensic science


    Reference

    1

    1. W. C. Lee and B. E. Khoo, Malaysian J. Forensic Sci., 1(1), 17-28 (2010).

    2

    2. E. M. Robinson, ‘Crime Scene Photography’, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, MA, 2009.

    3

    3. S. Bleay, R. Croxton and M. Puit, ‘Fingerprint Development Techniques - Theory and Application’, 1st Ed., Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2018.

    4

    4. M. Takatsu, O. Shimoda, K. Onishi, A. Onishi and N. oguri, J. Forensic Sci., 53(4), 823-827 (2008).

    5

    5. S. Bleay, V. Sears, R. Downham, H. Bandey, A. Gibson, V. Bowman, L. Fitzgerald, T. Ciuksza, J. Ramadani and C. Selway, ‘Fingerprint Source Book v2.0’, 2nd Ed., Home Office Centre for Applied Science and Technology, London, 2017.

    6

    6. R. Scholte, I. Lopez, N. B. Roozen and H. Nijmeijer, Acta Acust. United Acust., 94(3), 339-348 (2008).

    7

    7. R. S. Ramotowski, ‘Lee and Gaensslen’s advances in fingerprint technology’, 3rd Ed., CRC Press, Florida, 2012.

    8

    8. C. Wallace-Kunkel, C. Lennard, M. Stoilovic and C. Roux, Forensic Sci. Int., 168(1), 14-26 (2007).

    9

    9. M. Stoilovic, C. Lennard, C. Wallace-Kunkel and C. Roux, J. Forensic Identif., 57(1), 4-18 (2007).

    10

    10. H. Bandey, ‘Fingermark Visualisation Manual’, Home Office Police Scientific Development Branch, 2014.

    11

    11. V. G. Sears and T. M. Prizeman, J. Forensic Identif., 50(5), 470-480 (2000).

    12

    12. imagej.nih.gov/ij/download.html, Accessed 30 May 2021.

    상단으로 이동

    Analytical Science and Technology