바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

대중서사연구

  • P-ISSN1738-3188
  • E-ISSN2713-9964

상상된 공감, 소통의 시학 -『나마스테』에 나타난 법과 인권의 문제를 중심으로-

Imagined Sympathy, Poetry of Communication -Centered on the human rights and legal matter appeared on Namaste-

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)2713-9964
2010, v.0 no.24, pp.183-210
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2010..24.007
엄미옥 (서강대학교)

Abstract

Namaste is the work that treats the industrial training system, employment permit system, legal matter for the marriage between migrant worker and Korean lady and the nationality act in the realism. This study has clarified the conflict aspect between legal narration and literary narration and looked into the possibility raised by the literary imagination beyond the law The continuous deaths of the migrant works, who are under the illegal stay restriction and the compulsory deportation and the situation of violation of the human rights before the employment permit system is executed, show that the human rights in the national state belongs to the citizens of specific nation. Meanwhile, the nationality act, which the gender is discriminated in the patriarchy that the marriage between foreign male and Korean female is exclusive and based on the pure-blood principle, is not being from the one lining the territory of the national state. Namely, the migrant workers, who exist being bared lives, all the rights being deprived, disclose the fiction of the modern sovereign right to establish the legal order as the place asking back the continuity between human and citizen, and between birth and nationality. Namaste, in order to overcome the legal limit of such law, lets the readers form the imaged sympathy through the identification effect for the reliable friend. It creates the sensitivity for the human rights by stirring the hostility against the injustice and the feeling of solidarity. Furthermore, the writer stresses the importance of communication to form the sympathy. It makes the grade of rank for the linguistic resources void and attracts the batter into the communication place by letting us hear various Nepali languages including the Tibetan myth and the terms related to the religion through the ignition of Camil. The literary imagination of Namaste, which describes such languages of communication, can enter in the legal order, which based on the jus sanguinis and the nationalism and give the effect to improvement of the legal system. Namaste is the work that treats the industrial training system, employment permit system, legal matter for the marriage between migrant worker and Korean lady and the nationality act in the realism. This study has clarified the conflict aspect between legal narration and literary narration and looked into the possibility raised by the literary imagination beyond the law The continuous deaths of the migrant works, who are under the illegal stay restriction and the compulsory deportation and the situation of violation of the human rights before the employment permit system is executed, show that the human rights in the national state belongs to the citizens of specific nation. Meanwhile, the nationality act, which the gender is discriminated in the patriarchy that the marriage between foreign male and Korean female is exclusive and based on the pure-blood principle, is not being from the one lining the territory of the national state. Namely, the migrant workers, who exist being bared lives, all the rights being deprived, disclose the fiction of the modern sovereign right to establish the legal order as the place asking back the continuity between human and citizen, and between birth and nationality. Namaste, in order to overcome the legal limit of such law, lets the readers form the imaged sympathy through the identification effect for the reliable friend. It creates the sensitivity for the human rights by stirring the hostility against the injustice and the feeling of solidarity. Furthermore, the writer stresses the importance of communication to form the sympathy. It makes the grade of rank for the linguistic resources void and attracts the batter into the communication place by letting us hear various Nepali languages including the Tibetan myth and the terms related to the religion through the ignition of Camil. The literary imagination of Namaste, which describes such languages of communication, can enter in the legal order, which based on the jus sanguinis and the nationalism and give the effect to improvement of the legal system.

keywords
Legal Narrative, Literary Imagination, Migrant worker, Human Rights, Citizenship, National State, Modern Sovereign Right, Homo Sacer, Sympathy, Communication, 법의 서사, 문학적 상상력, 이주노동자, 인권, 시민권, 국민국가, 근대주권, 호모사케르, 공감, 소통

참고문헌

1.

공선옥, 「명랑한 밤길」, 『창작과 비평』, 2005, 가을호(통권 129호).

2.

김재영, 「코끼리」, 『창작과 비평』, 2004, 가을호(통권 125호).

3.

김재영, 「아홉개의 푸른 쏘냐」, 『내일을 여는 작가』, 2005, 겨울호(통권 41호).

4.

박범신, 『나마스테』, 한겨레 출판, 2005.

5.

손홍규, 「이무기 사냥꾼」, 『문학동네』, 2005 여름호(통권 43호).

6.

이혜경, 「물 한모금」, 『문학과 사회』, 2003 봄호(통권 61호).

7.

김태환, 「예외성의 철학-조르조 아감벤의 『호모사케르:통치권력과 벌거숭이 삶』」, 『문학과 사회』제 67호, 문학과 지성사, 2004, 1281-1297쪽.

8.

김혜진, 「인권과 탈근대적 시민권 담론 -국내 이주 노동자의 사례를 중심으로」, 서울대 석사논문, 2008.

9.

린 헌트, 전진성 옮김, 『인권의 발명』, 돌베게, 2009.

10.

박정애, 「2000년대 한국 소설에서 ‘다문화가족’의 성별적 재현 양상 연구」, 『여성문학 연구』22호, 한국여성문학학회, 2009, 93-121쪽.

11.

박 진, 「박범신 장편소설 『나마스테』에 나타난 이주노동자의 재현 이미지와 국민국가의 문제」, 『현대문학이론연구』40권, 현대문학이론학회, 2010, 223-239쪽.

12.

설동훈, 「외국인 노동자와 인권-‘국가의 주권’과 ‘국민의 기본권’ 및 ‘인간의 기본권’의 상충요소 검토-」, 『민주주의와 인권』제5권 2호, 전남대학교 5,18연구소, 2005, 39-77쪽.

13.

설동훈, 「국제노동력이동과 외국인 노동자의 시민권에 관한 연구」, 『민주주의와 인권』제7권 2호, 전남대학교 5,18연구소, 2007, 369-419쪽.

14.

오경석, 「어떤 다문화주의인가」, 『한국에서의 다문화주의-현실과 쟁점』, 한울, 2007.

15.

오윤호, 「외국인 이주자의 형상화와 우리 안의 타자담론」, 『현대문학이론연구』40호, 현대문학이론학회, 2010, 241-262쪽.

16.

오윤호, 「디아스포라 플롯-2000년대 소설에 형상화된 다문화사회의 외국인 이주자」, 『시학과 언어학』17호, 시학과 언어학회, 2009, 231-249쪽.

17.

우한용, 「21세기 한국사회의 다양성과 소설적 전망」, 『현대소설연구』40호, 한국현대소설학회, 2008, 7-35쪽.

18.

이선옥, 「한국 이주노동자운동의 형성과 성격 변화-고용허가제 도입 시기 명동성당 농성단 사례를 중심으로」, 성공회대학교 석사논문, 2005.

19.

이수자, 「이주여성 디아스포라 - 국제성별분업, 문화혼성성, 타자화와 섹슈얼리티」, 『한국사회학』제38집 2호, 한국사회학회, 2004, 189-220쪽.

20.

장 푸랑수아 리오타르, 엄순영· 정태욱 역, 「타자의 권리」, 『현대사상과 인권-옥스퍼드 엠네스티 강의』, 사람생각, 2000.

21.

정혜경, 「2000년대 가족서사에 나타난 다문화주의의 딜레마」, 『현대소설연구』40호, 한국현대소설학회, 2008, 37-61쪽.

22.

정혜실, 「파키스탄 이주노동자와 결혼한 여성들의 이야기」, 『한국에서의 다문화주의』, 한울, 2007.

23.

조르조 아감벤 지음, 박진우 옮김, 『호모 사케르』, 새물결, 2008.

24.

최경도, 「법과 문학: 정의의 문제」, 『새한영어영문학』, 제48권 1호, 2006, 83-97쪽.

25.

최경도, 「헤라클레스의 활; 법과 문학의 서사전략」, 『새한영어영문학』, 제51권 3호, 2009. 181-197쪽.

26.

최 현, 『인권』, 책세상, 2008.

27.

황호덕, 「넘은 것이 아니다」, 『문학동네』, 2006 겨울호, 418-434쪽.

28.

Jerome Seymour Bruner 지음, 강현석·김경수 옮김, 『이야기 만들기』, 교육 과학사, 2010.

29.

Slaughter, Joseph R, Human Rights, Inc; the world novel, narrative form and international law, New York; Fordham University Press, 2007.

대중서사연구