바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

대중서사연구

자기 개발의 서사와 미적 낭만성-노자영의 소설을 중심으로

A Study on the Narrative of Self-development and the Aesthetic romanticism-concentrating on No, Ja-young’s Novels

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2012, v.0 no.28, pp.7-39
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2012..28.001
진영복 (연세대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Sense and body was understood as an important and necessary element for forming a subject at the Joseon literary world in the early 1920’s, which was denied by the enlightenment and reason. With this, they tried to find the freedom of the individual and give a high value to inner personality. Also No, Ja-young persuaded the way for self-affirmation, which is aware of personality, as romantic approaching to sense, emotion and passions at the novel in the 1920’. The sense of youth yearned dating which is an appreciator of personality and unknown, and had desire to have a family through romantic love. The public’s longing for dating of the day was a foundation which No, Ja-young generates literature, and an opportunity to spread it, so there are full of optimism of appropriateness at his novel in 1920’s, which realizes ‘complete self’ or ‘real-self’. This appropriateness can be met with romantic aesthetic sense as an optimistic prospect for future and dating or made with a tragic grudge following failure of realization of love and his idea. On the other hand, at No ja young’s novel in 1930’, he took the focus on various existences in the real world and their ‘self-crack’, while putting ‘complete self’ and ‘real-self’ in brackets. Therefore, while his novels was reproduced the achievement of self-development that a society personage of the colonized Joseon period obtained and appeared their personal deception or snobbery in the private field at the same time, which it had both such attitude like that. Like that, while No, Ja-young combined ideologically the enlightened declaration for romance of sense and personality into the novel of 20’s, at one of 30’, it was disclosing in naturalism that romantic aesthetic sense was failing completely in closeness and pitiableness of the daily life world. Such attitude in naturalism has a limitation that can’t change the violating mind which is mockery and overturned value, to the real power.

keywords
No, Ja-young, Novels, Self-development, Self-affirmation, appropriateness, Aesthetic romanticism, self-crack, existence, pitiableness, No, Ja-young, Novels, Self-development, Self-affirmation, appropriateness, Aesthetic romanticism, self-crack, existence, pitiableness, 노자영, 소설, 자기 개발, 자기 확인, 당위, 미적 낭만성, 자기 균열, 존재, 비루함

참고문헌

1.

ꠓ반항ꠗ,

2.

ꠓ청춘의 광야ꠗ,

3.

ꠓ무한애의 금상ꠗ,

4.

ꠓ영원의 무정ꠗ,

5.

ꠓ표박의 비탄ꠗ,

6.

ꠓ인생안내ꠗ,

7.

노자영의 1920- 30년대 신문·잡지 수록 소설.

8.

권보드래, .작품연보., ꠓ사랑의 불꽃 반항(외)ꠗ, 범우, 2009,

9.

김현주, .한국 대중소설의 전개와 독자의 문제., ꠓ독서연구ꠗ 13호, 2005.6, 23-59쪽.

10.

임정연, .근대소설의 낭만적 감수성-나도향과 노자영 소설을 중심으로., ꠓ현대소설 연구ꠗ 48권, 한국현대소설학회, 2011, 321-346쪽.

11.

진영복, .1920년대 대중적 글쓰기와 근대적 주체의 자유상 : 노자영 소설 <반항>을 중심으로., ꠓ현대문학의 연구. 35권, 한국문학연구학회, 2008, 413-443쪽.

12.

진영복, .성(性)의 모더니티를 바라보는 세 가지 시선., ꠓ어문론총ꠗ 48호, 한국문학 언어학회, 2008.6, 257-289쪽.

13.

木村直惠, ꠓ靑年の誕生ꠗ, 新曜社, 1998.

14.

미셀 푸코, 이혜숙 역, ꠓ성의 역사 3 : 자기에의 배려ꠗ, 나남, 2004.

15.

M. 바흐찐, 김근식 역, ꠓ도스또예프스끼 시학ꠗ, 정음사, 1988.

16.

앤서니 기든스, 배은경 외 옮김, ꠓ현대사회의 성, 사랑, 에로티시즘ꠗ, 새물결, 1996.

17.

에바 일루즈, 김정아 역, ꠓ감정 자본주의ꠗ, 돌베개, 2010.

18.

쥘리아 크리스테바, 김인환 역, ꠓ사랑의 역사ꠗ, 민음사, 2008.

19.

질 들뢰즈, 이경신 역, ꠓ니체와 철학ꠗ, 민음사, 1998.

20.

하버마스, 이진우 옮김, ꠓ현대성의 철학적 담론ꠗ, 문예출판사, 1995.

대중서사연구