바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

대중서사연구

프로키노 영사회 관람공간의 성격과 <연돌실 페로(煙突室ペロー)>

The nature of space in Prokino’s screenings and <Entotsusitsu Pero>

대중서사연구 / 대중서사연구, (P)1738-3188; (E)27139964
2013, v.0 no.29, pp.231-259
https://doi.org/10.18856/jpn.2013..29.008
정충실 (東京大學)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Prokino(1928-1934) could not make films that captured the attention of audiences because of the lack of manpower and money. Inferior screening conditions including outdoor screening, bad equipment, and poor accompaniment added to its negatives. For these reasons, the audience never seemed to pay complete attention while viewing their films. They engaged in simultaneous conversation, arbitrarily analyzed the film, and commented on the various aspects of it while they viewed it. In such a free atmosphere, the viewing space became a space of resistance when the audience was composed of workers, and a cognate space of colonial people when the audience was composed of Koreans in imperial Japan. Because of relaxed viewing conditions and the proletarian camaraderie of audience in the screening, audiences regarded <Entotsusitsu Pero> as an antiwar film. But <Entotsusitsu Pero> was not an antiwar movie but a juvenile movie.

keywords
프로키노, 관람 공간, 관객들 간 연대, 저항적 공간, 연돌실 페로, Prokino, viewing condition, Audience, Camaraderie of audience, Space of resistance, Entotsusitsu Pero

참고문헌

1.

現代と思想

2.

プロレタリア映画

3.

プロキノ映画

4.

文化評論

5.

部落問題と文芸

6.

映画クラブ

7.

東亜日報

8.

キネマ旬報

9.

新興映画

10.

北田暁大, 「誘惑する声/映画(館)の誘惑―\戦前期日本映画における声の編成」, 拡大するモダニティ , 岩波書店, 2002.

11.

雨宮幸明, 「プロキノ映画 山宣渡政労農葬 フイルムヴァリエーションに関する考察」, 立命館言語文化研究 22-3, 2011, 111-124面.

12.

禧美智章, 「影絵アニメーション 煙突室ペロー とプロキノ-1930年代の自主制作アニメーションの一考察」, 立命館言語文化研究 22-3, 2011, 21-33面.

13.

全日本映画教育研究会, 映画教育講座 , 四海書房, 1943.

14.

北川鉄夫, 映画鑑賞読本 , 法律文化社, 1955.

15.

戦旗復刻版刊行会, 昭和初期左翼映画雑誌別圏 , 戦旗復刻版刊行会, 1981.

16.

並木晋作, 日本プロレタリア映画と同盟全史 , 合同出版, 1986.

17.

御園京平, 活弁の時代 , 岩波書店, 1990.

18.

山形国際ドキュメンタリー映画際東京事務局編, ドキュメンタリー映画は語る , 未来社, 2006.

19.

十重田裕一, 映画館 , ゆまに書房, 2006.

대중서사연구