The purpose of this study is to examine several literature museums/literary spaces related to the writer Pak Kyongni and her novel Toji, and the characteristics and status of each of them. The changes in the environment surrounding literature are naturally altering the public’s culture-consuming patterns as well as, ultimately, the production, consumption, and distribution of literature. The creation of various spaces related to literature, too, is one of the concrete examples of these changes. This study aims to critically investigate contents planning and program operation in literature museums/literary spaces and to also explore methods of vitalizing literature museums using this as its basis. We can find distinguishing literary spaces dealing with Pak Kyongni and her novel Toji in Seoul, Wonju, Hadong, and Tongyeong. Some are operating their programs successfully according to the regional characteristics, but some are showing a tendency to repeat the same words and obvious errors. Literature museums should not behave like stationary objects to be seen like a stuffed bird but rather as living entities that should actively cope with the outer environment. Literature museums should play roles as a medium that allows people to be closer to the original source. Using literature museums as the base, we need to conduct research on literature and develop a variety of participating programs such as training sessions and exhibitions. These museums should be allowed to lead activities so that they can evolve as complex cultural spaces. When literature museums are located sporadically just like those for writer Pak Kyongni and her novel Toji, it is necessary to found and operate an organ or committee that can function as a control tower that may oversee their roles. Also, it is urgently needed to secure experts that can operate and manage the literary spaces. The absence of experts will lead to a lack of expertise in literature museums after all. Only when an expert is secured that is equipped with professional knowledge about the literature museums, will it be possible to carry out the reproduction of literary works, succession of the author’s artistic spirit, development of lectures, or the planning of exhibitions and experiential activities to attract and intrigue visitors. Of course, to realize all these things favorably, it is needed for the local government to provide financial support. However, it is not the local government’s exclusive duty to plan and build literature museums/literary spaces and implement the policy. Meaningful results can be produced when there is communication and cooperation between the local government and expert groups specializing in the planning of architecture, design, and contents.
김덕수, 「문화산업으로서의 문학산업」, 『현대문학이론연구』 25, 2005, 5-24쪽.
김진영, 「인간주의 지리학 관점에서의 장소성 프로세스를 적용한 문학지리학 연구—소설 『토지』 속 평사리를 중심으로」, 『지리교육논집』 55, 2011, 1-16쪽.
문재원, 「지역문학관의 재현과 로컬리티—박경리문학관을 중심으로」, 『인문과학연구』 36, 2013, 31-54쪽.
문화관광부 편, 『유명 예술가 유치에 따른 가치평가 분석』, 문화관광부, 2006.
박기수, 「한국문화콘텐츠학의 형황과 전망—스토리텔링을 중심으로」, 『대중서사연구』 16, 2006, 7-31쪽.
박승희, 「로컬리티 문화 표상과 지역 문학관의 재구성」, 『한민족어문학』 72, 2016, 409-433쪽.
송요셉, 「OSMU의 개념적 모델 구성을 위한 시론적 연구」, 『인문콘텐츠』 9, 2007, 325-349쪽.
오태영, 「문학관의 공간 조직화와 수행적 신체」, 『한국문학과 예술』 20, 2016, 145-173쪽.
윤학로·김점석·프랑수아즈 쥘리앙-카자노바, 「문학관 설립을 위한 대학과 지방자치단체의 협약에 관한 연구」, 『프랑스문화예술』 12, 2004, 345-368쪽.
이명호·오삼균·도슬기, 「라키비움(Larchiveum) 관점에서 본 국내 문학관의 운영실태와 과제—국내 문학관의 기능적 요소를 중심으로」, 『한국도서관정보학회지』 46, 2015, 139-159쪽.
이중엽, 「문화콘텐츠산업 발전을 위한 정책 방향 연구」, 『디지털디자인학연구』 6, 2003, 83-98쪽.
이 투 푸안, 『토포필리아』, 이옥진 역, 2011.
정경운, 「한국문화콘텐츠의 활성화 방안 연구—국내 문학관 프로그램 운영방식을 중심으로」, 『현대문학이론연구』 25, 2005, 25-47쪽.
조윤아, 「공간의 성격과 공간 구성」, 최유찬 외 편, 『토지의 문화지형학』, 소명출판, 2004.
찰스 랜드리, 『창조도시』, 임상오 역, 도서출판 해남, 2005.
최유찬, 『토지를 읽는다』, 솔, 1996.
함태영, 「문학관의 현황 및 인천문화재단이 만드는 한국근대문학관」, 『민족문학사 연구』 47, 2011, 326-352쪽.
「러시아 상트대에 박경리 작가 동상 섰다」, 『한겨레』, 2018.6.20.
<『토지』 완간 10주년 기념 대담>, 마산 MBC, 2004.
박경리기념관(http://pkn.tongyeong.go.kr)
박경리문학공원(http://tojipark.wonju.go.kr)
통영관광포탈(http://www.utour.go.kr)
한국근대문학관(http://lit.ifac.or.kr)
한국문학관협회(http://www.munhakwan.com)