바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.31 No.1

Citation Share

Anti-predator Responses of the Black-tailed Gull (Larus crassirostris) Flock to Mobbing and Mew Call Playbacks

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2008, v.31 no.1, pp.69-73
Park, Shi-Ryong (Korean National University of Education)
Song-Yi Lee (Korean National University of Education)
Seokwan Cheong (Korean National University of Education)
Sukyung Kim (Korean National University of Education)

Park,, S. , Song-Yi, L. , Seokwan, C. , Sukyung, K. , & (2008). Anti-predator Responses of the Black-tailed Gull (Larus crassirostris) Flock to Mobbing and Mew Call Playbacks. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 31(1), 69-73.

Abstract

We studied the functional roles of two types of calls, mew calls and mobbing calls, of the black-tailed gull (Larus crassirostris) by examining responses of mixed flocks of gulls to the playback calls. Playback experiments were conducted on four days between 11 May and 5 June 2007 at 16 sites in Sinjindo-ri and Dowhang-ri, Taean-gun, Chungnam province and Imjado, Sinan-gun, Jeonnam province, South Korea. We examined the anti-predator responses of the gulls to the playback trials. We found that gull flocks initially playbacks of the mobbing cal and control (group mobbing) call evoked mobbing. When trials in which no response was recorded were excluded, we found that the gulls responses to mobbing and group mobbing call playbacks was more intense than their response to mew cal playbacks, in that gulls mobbed longer, more guls responded, and gulls took flight after a shorter time interval. However, the intensity of the gulls response did not differ in mobbing cal and group mobbing cal playbacks. The results of this study suggest that the mixed-species flocks of guls discriminate between the mew calls and the mobbing calls.

keywords
Avian communication, Black-tailed gull, Larus crassirostris, Mobbing call

Reference

1.

Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

2.

Chung H, Park SR. 2006. A study on alarm call of Black-tailed Gulls (Larus crassirostris) for bird strike program. J Korean Aeronautical Sci and Flight Operation 14: 87-93.

3.

Curio E. 1978. The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z. Tierpsychol 48: 175-l 83.

4.

Curio E. Regelmann K. 1986. Predator harassment implies a real deadly risk: A reply to Hennessy. Ethology 72: 75-78.

5.

Doran PJ, Gulezian PZ, Betts MG. 2005. A test of the mobbing playback method for estimating bird reproductive success. J Field Ornithol 76: 227-233.

6.

Ficken MS, Popp J. 1996. A comparative analysis of passerine mobbing calls. Auk 113: 370-380.

7.

Good TP. 1998. Great Black-backed Gull (Larus marinus). In: The Birds of North America, No. 330 (Poole A, Gill F, eds). The American Ornithologists’ Union. Philadelphia, Washington, D.C.

8.

Hand JL. 1979. Vocal communication of the Westem Gull (Larus occidentalis) (PhD dissertation). University California, Los Angeles.

9.

Hand JL. 1981. A comparison of vocalizations of Western Gulls (Larus occidentalis occidentalis and L. o. livens). Condor 83: 289-301.

10.

Klump GM, Shalter MD. 1984. Acoustic behaviour of birds and mammals in the predator context. Z Tierpsychol 66: 189-226.

11.

Marler P, Evans CS, Hauser MD. 1992. Animal signals: Motivational, referential, or both? In: Nonverbal vocal communication: comparative and developmental approaches (Papousek H, Jurgens U, Papousek M, eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 66-86.

12.

Marler P, Hamilton WJ. 1966. Mechanisms of animal behavior. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

13.

Marler P. 1955. Characteristics of some alarm calls. Nature 176: 6-8.

14.

Marler P. 1959. Developments in the study of animal communication. In: Darwin's biological work (Bell P, ed). Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, pp 150-206.

15.

Mierauskas P, Buzun V. 1988. Acoustic signaling of the Great Blackheaded Gull Larus ichthyaetus Pallas. Bioacoustics 1: 49-56.

16.

Park SR, Chung H, Cheong S, Lee SY, Sung HC. 2007. Anti-predator responses of Black-tailed Gull (Larus crassirostris) flocks to alarm calls during the post-breeding season. J Ecol Field Biol 30:9-15.

17.

Park SR, Park DS. 1997. Acoustic communication of the Black-tailed Gull (Larus crassirostris): the structure and behavioral context of vocalizations. Korean J Biol Sci 1: 565-569.

18.

Pierotti RJ, Good TP. 1994. Herring Gull (Larus argentatus). In: The Birds of North America, No. 124 (Poole A, Gill F, eds). The American Ornithologists’ Union. Philadelphia, Washington, D.C.

19.

Shalter MD. 1978. Localization of passerine seet and mobbing calls by goshawks and pygmy owls. Z Tierpsychol 59: 338-350.

20.

Sordahl TA. 1990. The risks of avian mobbing and distraction behavior: an anecdotal review. Wilson Bull. 102: 349-352.

21.

Tinbergen N. 1953. The herring gull’s world. Collins, London.

22.

Tinbergen N. 1960. The Herring Gull’s world, second ed. Basic Books, New York.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy