바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

Successional Changes in Seed Banks in Abandoned Rice Fields in Gwangneung, Central Korea

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2008, v.31 no.4, pp.269-276
이선미 (서울여자대학교 환경?생명과학부)
조용찬 (서울여자대학교 환경?생명과학부)
신현철 (서울여자대학교 환경?생명과학부)
오우석 (서울여자대학교 환경?생명과학부)
설은실 (서울여자대학교 환경?생명과학부)
박성애 (서울여자대학교 환경?생명과학부)
이창석 (서울여자대학교)

Abstract

In order to understand the role of seed banks for restoration, seed banks in abandoned rice fields in the Gwangneung National Arboretum, central Korea were investigated using the seedling emergence method. The study sites represented three stages: an initial stage dominated by forbs such as Persicaria thunbergii and Juncus effuses var. decipiens, a middle stage dominated by Salix, and a late stage dominated by Quercus aliena and Prunus padus (in nearby riparian forest chosen as a reference stand). DCA ordination arranged the stands according to the number of years since abandonment. CCA ordination identified the dominant environmental variables correlated most closely with Axes 1 and 2 as Mg²+ (intraset correlation was 0.827) and K+ (intraset correlation was -0.677), respectively. Species richness and diversity decreased from the initial stage (H'=2.61) to the middle (H'=1.79) and late (H'=0.75) stages. A total of 49 species (/m²) and 18,620 seedlings (/m²) emerged out of the seed bank samples. The DCA ordination and similarity analysis detected a large discrepancy between the composition of the actual vegetation and the seed bank. We conclude that the contribution of seed bank to restoration is low. However, seed bank may help the recovery of forbs after disturbance. Some of our results are consistent with the tolerance model of succession whereas others follow the trajectory of the facilitation model. More research on succession will be required to understand the underlying mechanisms.

keywords
Abandoned rice fields, Gwangneung, Restoration, Seed bank, Succession

참고문헌

1.

Amiaud B, Touzard B. 2004. The relationships between soil seed bank, aboveground vegetation and disturbances in old embanked marshlands of Western France. Flora 199: 25-35.

2.

Barbour MG, Burk JH, Pitts WD, Gilliam FS, Schwartz MW. 1999. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. 3rd Ed. Addison Wesley Longman, New York.

3.

Baskin CC, Baskin JM. 1998. Seed-ecology, Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, London.

4.

Baskin JM, Baskin CC. 1980. Role of seed reserves in the persistence of a local population of Sedum pulchellum: a direct field observation. Bull Torrey Bot Club 107: 429-430.

5.

Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Grandin U, Kalamess R, Milberg P, Poschlod P, Thompson K, Willems JH. 1998. Seed size shape and vertical distribution in the soil: indicators of seed longevity. Funct Ecol 12: 834-842.

6.

Bertiller MB. 1992. Seasonal variation in the seed bank of a Patagonian grassland in relation to grazing and topography. J Veg Sci 3: 47-54.

7.

Bossuyt B, Heyn M, Hermy M. 2002. Seed bank and vegetation composition of forest stands of varying age in central Belgium: consequences for regeneration of ancient forest vegetation. Plant Ecol 162: 33-48.

8.

Bradshaw AD. 1984. Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Plan 11: 35-48.

9.

Brock MA, Rogers KH. 1998. The regeneration potential of the seed bank of an ephemeral floodplain in South Africa. Aquat Bot 61: 123-135.

10.

Chambers JC, MacMahon JA. 1994. A day in the life of a seed: movements and fates of seeds and their implications for natural and managed systems. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25: 263-292.

11.

Connell JH, Slatyer RO. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111: 1119-1124.

12.

Douglas G. 1965. The weed flora of chemically-renewed lowland swards. J Brit Grassland Soc 4: 189-194.

13.

Falinska K. 1999. Seed bank dynamics in abandoned meadows during a 20-years period in the Bialowieza National Park. Ecology 87: 461-475.

14.

Galatowitsh SM, van der Valk AG. 1996. The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlands. Ecol Appl 6: 102-112.

15.

Godefroid S, Phartyal SS, Koedam N. 2006. Depth distribution and composition of seed banks under different tree layers in a managed temperate forest ecosystem. Acta Oecol 29: 283-292.

16.

Greig-Smith P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 171-226.

17.

Grime JP. 1989. Seed banks in ecological perspective. In: Ecology of Soil Seed Banks (Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL, eds). Academic Press, London, pp 15-22.

18.

Haag RW. 1981. Emergence of seedlings of aquatic macrophytes from lake sediments. Can J Bot 61: 148-156.

19.

Harper JL. 1977. The Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York.

20.

Harwell MC, Havens KE. 2003. Experimental studies on the recovery potential of submerged aquatic vegetation after flooding and desiccation in a large subtropical lake. Aquat Bot 77: 131-151.

21.

Hassan MA, West NE. 1986. Dynamics of soil seed pools in burned and unburned sagebrush semi desert. Ecology 67: 269-272.

22.

Hill MO. 1979. DECORANA - A FORTRAN Program for Detrended Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Cornell University Ithaca, New York.

23.

Jackson MC. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New York.

24.

Johnston A, Smoliak S, Stringer PW. 1969. Viable seed population in Alberta prairie top soils. Can J Plant Sci 49: 75-82.

25.

Jutila HM. 1998. Seed banks of grazed and ungrazed Baltic seashore meadows. J Vege Sci 9: 395-408.

26.

Kim JG, Ju EJ. 2005. Soil seed banks at three ecological preservation areas in Seoul. Korean J Ecol 28(5): 271-279 (In Korean with English abstract).

27.

Kim KD, Lee EJ. 2005. Soil seed bank of the waste landfills in South Korea. Plant Soil 271: 109-121.

28.

Korean Plant Names Index. 2003. http://www.koreaplants.go.kr:9090/

29.

Lee CS, Cho YC, Shin HC, Moon JS, Lee BC, Bae YS, Byun HG, Yi HB. 2006. Ecological response of streams in Korea under different management regimes. Korean Water Resources Association 6(3): 131-147.

30.

Lee CS, Park HS, You YH, Kim SK. 1998. A study on vegetation succession in abandoned paddy fields. J Natural Sci Ins, Seoul Women’s University, Vol. 10. pp 29-43 (In Korean).

31.

Lee CS, You YH, Robinson GR. 2002. Secondary succession and natural habitat restoration in abandoned rice fields of central Korea. Rest Ecol 10(2): 306-314.

32.

Lee TB. 1985. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyangmoonsa (In Korean).

33.

Lim JW, Shin JH, Jin GZ, Chun JH, Oh JS. 2003. Forest stand structure, site characteristics and carbon budget of the Kwangneung natural forest in Korea. Korean J Agri For Meteo 5: 101-109.

34.

Livingston RB, Allessio ML. 1968. Buried viable seed in successional fields and forest stands Harvard Forest, M.A. Bull Torey Bot Club 95: 58-69.

35.

McCune B, Mefford MJ. 1999. PC-ORD, multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. MjM Software Design, Glenden Beach, Oregon.

36.

National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2000. Methods of analysis for soils and plants. Rural Development Administration.

37.

National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

38.

Olano JM, Caballero I, Laskurain NA, Loidi J, Escudero A. 2002. Seed bank spatial pattern in a temperate secondary forest. J Veg Sci 13: 775-784.

39.

Oosting HF, Humpreys ME. 1940. Buried viable seeds in successional series of old fields and forests. Bull Torrey Bot Club 67: 253-273.

40.

Park SH. 1995. Colored Illustrations of Naturalized Plants of Korea. Ilchokak.

41.

Prach K, Pyšek P. 2001. Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: experience from Central Europe. Ecol Eng 17: 55-62.

42.

Pratt DW, Black RA, Zamora BA. 1984. Buried viable seed in a ponderosa pine community. Can J Bot 62: 44-52.

43.

Pywell RF, Bullock JM, Hopkins A, Walker KJ, Sparks TH, Burke MJW, Peel S. 2002. Restoration of species-rich grassland on arable land: assessing the limiting processes using a multi-site experiment. J Appl Ecol 39: 294-309.

44.

Rabinowitz D. 1981. Buried viable seeds in a North American tallgrass prairie: the resemblance of their abundance and composition to dispersing seeds. Oikos 36: 191-195.

45.

Richter R, Stromberg JC. 2005. Soil seed banks of two montane riparian areas: implications for restoration. Biol Cons 14: 993-1016.

46.

Roberts TL, Carson WP, Vankat JL. 1984. The seed bank and the initial revegetation of disturbance sites in Hueston Woods State Nature Preserve. In: Houston Woods State Park and Nature Preserve (Wilkeke GE, ed). Miami University, Oxford, OH, pp 150-155.

47.

Roovers P, Bossuyt B, Igodt B. 2006. May seed banks contribute to vegetation restoration on paths in temperate deciduous forest? Plant Ecol 187: 25-38.

48.

Ryang HS, Kim DS, Park SH. 2004. Weed of Korea. Rijeon Agricultural Resources Publications (In Korean).

49.

Simpson RL, Leck MA, Parker TV. 1989. Seed banks: General concepts and methological issues. In: Ecology of Soil Seed Banks (Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL, eds). Academic Press, London, pp 1-8.

50.

Solomon TB, Snyman HA, Smit GN. 2006. Soil seed bank characteristics in relation to land use systems and distance from water in a semi-arid rangeland of southern Ethiopia. South Afr J Bot 72: 263-271.

51.

Stanturf JA, Schoenholtz SH, Schweitzer CJ, Shepard JP. 2001. Achieving restoration success: myths in bottomland hardwood forests. Rest Ecol 9(2): 189-200.

52.

Tasser E, Walde J, Tappeiner U, Teutsch A, Noggler W. 2006. Landuse changes and natural reforestation in the Eastern Central Alps. Agri Ecosys Environ 118: 115-129.

53.

Ter Braak CJF. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new Eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67(5): 1167-1179.

54.

Ter Heerdt GNJ, Verweij GL, Bekker RM, Bekker JP. 1996. An improved method for seed-bank analysis: seedling emergence after removing the soil by sieving. Funct Ecol 10: 144-151.

55.

Thompson K, Grime JP. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J Ecol 67: 893-921.

56.

Thompson K. 2000. The functional ecology of soil seed banks. In: Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities, Second ed (Fenner M, ed). ABI Publishing, New York, pp 215-235.

57.

Van der Valk AG, Davis CB. 1979. A reconstruction of the recent vegetational history of a prairie marsh, eagle lake, Iowa from its seed bank. Aquat Bot 6: 29-51.

58.

Van der Valk EG, Pederson RL. 1989. Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetation In: Ecology of Soil Seed Banks (Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL, eds). Academic Press, Inc., London, pp 329-344.

59.

Walker KJ, Stevens PA, Stevens DP, Mountford JO, Manchester SJ, Pywell RF. 2004. The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK. Biol Cons 119: 1-18.

60.

Walker, LR, Chapin, FS. 1987. Interactions among processes controlling successional change. Oikos 50: 131-135.

61.

Warr JS, Kent M, Thompson K. 1994. Seed bank composition and variability in five woodlands in south-west England. J Biogeo 21: 151-168.

62.

Young TP. 2000. Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biol Conserv 92: 73-83.

63.

Zabinski CA, Wojtowicz T, Cole DN. 2000. The effect of recreation disturbance on subalpine seed banks in the Rocky Mountains of Montana. Can J Bot 78: 577-582.

64.

Zhan X, Li L, Cheng W. 2007. Restoration of Stipa kryloviisteppes in inner Mongolia of China: Assessment of seed banks and vegetation composition. J Arid Environ 68: 298-307.

Journal of Ecology and Environment