바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • ENGLISH
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

Induction of Conditioned Taste Aversion to Korean Pine Nuts (Pinus koraiensis) Treated with Lithium Chloride in Red Squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris)

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2008, v.31 no.4, pp.341-344
김의경 (강원대학교)
김원명 (국립환경과학원)
박영철 (강원대학교)
유병호 (국립환경연구원)
김종국 (강원대학교)

Abstract

We investigated the responses of red squirrels to pine nuts (Pinus koraiensis) treated with Lithium Chloride (LiCl) and the potential of the chemical for inducing conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in red squirrels. In red squirrels, nut feeding declined dramatically during the first 4 days after feeding with LiCl-treated nuts. The ratio of LiCl-treated nuts eaten to total nuts eaten declined from the 1st day in LC-¹ and the 2nd day in LC-², along with a general reduction in quantity eaten. Thus, feeding with LiCl-treated nuts induced CTA from the 2nd day after feeding, and CTA remained constant until the 4th day, but disappeared on the 5th day. The squirrels ate an average of 757.0 ± 106.1 mg (n = 2, range 682.0~832.0) of LiCl before dying on the 16th day of the study. The lethal dose of LiCl was 2.32 mg LiCl/g body weight, and the average amount of LiCl needed to induce CTA was 23.0 ± 4.24 mg (20 mg in LC-¹ and 26 mg in LC-²).

keywords
Conditioned taste aversion, Lithium Chloride, Pinus koraiensis, Red squirrels, Sciurus vulgaris

참고문헌

1.

Garcia J, Hankins WG, Rusiniak K. 1974. Behavioural regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. Science 184: 581-583.

2.

Gentle M, Massei G, Quy R. 2006. Diversity of diet influences the persistence of conditioned taste aversion in rats. Appl Anim Behav Sci 97: 303-311.

3.

Han SU, Yi JS. 1996. Age-age correlation for height growth of openpollinated progenies of Pinus koreaiensis in relation to their cone and seed characteristics. Korean J Breed 28: 63-68.

4.

Jaeger TV, Mucha RF. 1990. A taste aversion model of drug discrimination learning: training drug and condition influence rate of learning, sensitivity and drug specificity. Psychopharmacology 100: 145-150.

5.

KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2007. Statistical yearbook of forestry 37: 306-307.

6.

Massei G, Lyon AJ, Cowan DP. 2002. Conditioned taste aversion can reduce egg predation by rats. J Wildl Manage 66: 1134-1140.

7.

Mucha RF, Herz A. 1985. Motivational properties of kappa and mu opioid receptor agonists studied with place and taste preference conditioning. Psychopharmacology 86: 274-280.

8.

Prendergast MA, Hendricks SE, Yells DP, Balogh S. 1996. Conditioned taste aversion induced by fluoxetine. Physiol Behav 60: 311-315 .

9.

Song YH, Yun CW. 2006. Community type and stand structure of the Korean pine (Pinus koreaiensis) natural forest in Seoraksan National Park. Kor J Env Eco 20: 29-40. (in Korean with English abstract)

10.

Welzl H, D'Adamo P, Lipp HP. 2001. Conditioned taste aversion as a learning and memory paradigm. Behav Brain Res 125: 205-213.

11.

Yi JS, Song JH, Park MH, Han SUr. 1999. Crown shape control of Pinus koraiensis S. et Z. (III)-Crown shape types for seed and timber production from the trees under age Class III. Jour Korean For Soc 88: 195-204. (in Korean with English abstract)

Journal of Ecology and Environment