바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.1

Citation Share

Habitat Preference and Nest Predation Risk in the Blackbird (Turdus merula)

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2009, v.32 no.1, pp.41-45
(University of East Anglia)
(2009). Habitat Preference and Nest Predation Risk in the Blackbird (Turdus merula). Journal of Ecology and Environment, 32(1), 41-45.

Abstract

For last 150 years, blackbirds have moved from their ancestral habitat, the woodland edge, to man-made habitats such as farmland, parks and gardens. These alternative habitats have become one of main blackbird habitats. I compared density of nests and blackbirds in parks, woodland and campus of University of East Anglia to investigate habitat preference. Blackbirds preferred the area covered by 10～50% of tree or bush patches for their foraging and nesting sites. Blackbirds were more frequently found near buildings rather than far from buildings. Nest characteristics did not affect predation rate and nest preference. This study suggests that man-made habitats may be important for avoiding predation.

keywords
Blackbirds, Habitat preference, Nest characteristics, Patch cover, Predation

Reference

1.

British garden birds. 2003. http://www.garden-birds.co.uk/blackbird.htm.

2.

Chamberlain DE, Wilson AM, Brown SJ, Vickery A. 1999. Effects of type and management on the abundance of skylarks in the breeding season. J Appl Ecol 36: 856-870.

3.

Cresswell W. 1997. Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour. Anim Behav 53: 93- 103.

4.

De Santo TL, Willson MF. 2001. Predator abundance and predation of artificial nests in natural and anthropogenic coniferous forest edges in SE Alaska. J Field Ornithol 72: 136-149.

5.

Desrochers A. 1992. Age and foraging in European Blackbirds: variation between and within individuals. Anim Behav 43: 885-894.

6.

Evans AD, Smith KW. 1994. Habitat selection of Cirl Buntings Emberiza circlus wintering in Britan. Bird Study 41: 81-87.

7.

Filliater TS, Breitwisch R, Nealen PM. 1994. Predation on Northern Cardinal nests: does choice of nest site matter? Condor 96: 761-768.

8.

Fowler J, Cohen L. 1995. Statistics for Ornithologists. British Trust for Ornithology. UK.

9.

Fuller RJ, Gregory RD, Gibbons DW, Marchant JH, Wilson JD, Baillie SR, Carter N. 1995. Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conserv Biol 9: 1425- 1441.

10.

Gill JA, Sutherland WJ, Atkinson AR. 1996. A method to quality the effects of human disturbance on animal populations. J Appl Ecol 33: 786-792.

11.

Green RE. 1996. Factors affecting the diet of farmland skylarks Alauda arcensit. J Anim Ecol 47: 913-928.

12.

Hatchwell B, Ghamberlain DE, Perrins CM. 1996. The demography of blackbirds Turdus merula in rural habitats: is farmland a suboptimal habitat? J Appl Ecol 33: 1114-1124.

13.

Jacobs J. 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection. Oecologia 14: 413-417.

14.

Jokimaki J, Huhta E. 2000. Artificial nest predation and abundance of birds along an urban garden. Condor 102: 838-847.

15.

Liley D. 1999. Predicting the consequence of human disturbance, predation and sea-level raise for ringed plover populations. PhD Thesis. Univ of East Anglia, Norwich.

16.

Marchant JH, Hudson R, Carter SP, Whittington P. 1990. Population trends in British breeding birds. British Trust for Ornithology, Herts.

17.

Martin TE. 1993. Nest predation among vegetation layers and habitat types: revising the dogmas. Am Nat 141: 897-532.

18.

Martin TE. 1998. Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology 79: 656-570.

19.

Møoller AP. 1987. Egg predation as a selective factor for nest design: an experiment. Oikos 50: 91-94.

20.

Møoller AP. 1998. Nest predation and nest site choice in passerine birds in habitat patches of different sizes: a study of magpies and blackbirds. Oikos 53: 215-221.

21.

Osborne P, Osborne L. 1980. The contribution of nest site characteristics to breeding success among blackbirds Turdus merula. Ibis 122: 512-517.

22.

Ricklefs RE. 1969. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Zoology 9: 1-48.

23.

Sharrock JT. 1976. The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britan and Ireland. pp 340-341.

24.

Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Buckland ST, Fewster RW, Marchant JH, Wilson JD. 1998. Trends in the abundance of farmland birds: quantitative comparison of smoothed common bird census indices. J Appl Ecol 35: 24-43.

25.

Snow DW. 1958. A Study of Blackbirds. British Museum. London.

26.

Spear LB, Anderson DW. 1989. Nest site selection by yellow-footed gulls. Condor 91: 91-99.

27.

Stowe TJ, Newton AV, Green RE, Mayes E. 1993. The decline of the corncrake Crex crex in Britan and Ireland in relation to habitat. J Appl Ecol 30: 53-62.

28.

Strwiň.ski S. 1963. Studies on the synanthropism of birds in the Old Park in Ciechocinek. Acta Ornithol 7: 159-188.

29.

Taylor E. 2002. Predation risk in woodlark Lullula arborea habitat: the influence of recreational disturbance, predator abundance, nest site characteristics and temporal factors. Master Thesis. Univ of East Anglia, Norwich

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy