바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Initial Responses of Quercus serrata Seedlings and Forest Understory to Experimental Gap Treatments

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2009, v.32 no.2, pp.87-96





  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Pinus thunbergii plantations in Pohang-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea, are of low ecological quality, with arrested succession and a high proportion of ruderal species. To improve the quality of the habitat, we created canopy gaps (~ 42 m2) and monitored changes in abiotic (light availability, canopy openness) and biotic (survival and growth of seedlings and understory communities) variables in 2007 and 2008 in plots that had received one of five types of treatment: cutting of canopy trees and removal of the understory (CU), cutting of canopy trees only (C), girdling of canopy trees and removal of the understory (GU), girdling of canopy trees (G) or control. Each treatment was applied to three replicate plots. Abiotic variables did not significantly differ among treatments. Survival rates of target species were slightly lower in the CU, G and control conditions. Based on logistic regression analysis, the only significant growth factor affecting survival was height growth. Positive effects of seedling height and leaf area growth on survival were also detected, but did not reach statistical significance. In treatment G, gradual improvement of overstory conditions and mitigation of competition by limitation of disturbance to the understory community were likely to have promoted seedling growth. There were no significant effects of gap treatments on changes in species abundance (cover and richness) and composition of understory between the study years. This result implies that the small gaps created in our study may be below the threshold size to affect understory growth. However, the results of this study are based on a short-term investigation of only two years. Long-term research is strongly recommended to clarify the effects of gap treatment on plant communities in afforested areas.

keywords
Afforestation, Gap, Mudstone, Pinus thunbergii, Quercus serrata, Restoration, Understory, Yeongil

Reference

1.

Abe H, Masaki T, Nakashizuka T. 1995. Factors influencing sapling composition in canopy gaps of a temperate deciduous forest. Vegetatio 120: 21-32.

2.

Ashton PMS, Gamage S, Gunatilleke I, Gunatilleke CVS. 1997. Restoration of a Sri Lankan rainforest: using Caribbean pine Pinus caribaea as a nurse for establishing late-succession tree species. J Appl Ecol 34: 914-925.

3.

Baek MS, Cho DS. 1996. An experimental study on the comparison of the establishment and growth of seedlings among three oak species. Korean J Ecol 19: 125-139.

4.

Bazzaz FA, Pickett STA. 1980. Physiological ecology of tropical succession: a comparative review. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11: 287-310.

5.

Beon MS, Bartsch N. 2003. Early seedling growth of pine (Pinus densiflora) and oaks (Quercus serrata, Q. mongolica, Q. varabilis) in response to light intensity and soil moisture. Plant Ecology 167: 97-105.

6.

Biondini ME, Mielke Jr PW, Berry KJ. 1988. Data-dependent permutation techniques for the analysis of ecological data. Plant Ecology 75: 161-168.

7.

Busing RT, White PS. 1997. Species diversity and small-scale disturbance in an old-growth temperate forest: a consideration of gap partitioning concepts. Oikos 78: 562-568.

8.

Cho DS. 1992. Disturbance regime and tree regeneration in Kwangnung Natural Forest. Korean J Ecol 15: 395-410. (in Korean with English abstract)

9.

Cho HJ. 2005. Forest vegetation structures and successional trends in Young-il soil erosion control district. Jour Korean For Soc 94: 453-461. (in Korean with English abstract)

10.

Cho YC, Kim JS, Lee JH, Lee HH, Ma HS, Lee CS, Cho JH, Bae KH. 2009. Early responses of planted Quercus serrata seedlings and understory vegetation to artificial gap treatments in black locust plantation. Jour Korean For Soc 98: 94-105. (in Korean with English abstract)

11.

Cho YC. 2009. Restoration ecological assessment and improvement plan on a large scale afforestation practiced at the Young-il, southeastern Korea. PhD Dissertation. Seoul Women’s University, Seoul.

12.

Choi YD, Temperton VM, Allen EB, Grootjans AP, Halassy M, Hobbs RJ, Naeth MA, Torok K. 2008. Ecological restoration for future sustainability in a changing environment. Ecoscience 15: 53-64.

13.

Choi YD. 2004. Theories for ecological restoration in changing environment: toward "futuristic" restoration. Ecol Res 19: 75-81.

14.

Chung IK. 1979. Soil properties in bared forest land in Young-il mudstone area. In: Subjects of the Articles Presented in the Summer Conference in 1979. Jour Korea For Soc pp 87-88. (in Korean, title is translated by authors)

15.

Clinton BD. 2003. Light, temperature, and soil moisture response to elevation, evergreen understory, and small canopy gaps in the southern Appalachians. For Ecol Manage 186: 243-255.

16.

Coates KD, Burton PJ. 1997. A gap-based approach for development of silvicultural systems to address ecosystem management objectives. For Ecol Manage 99: 337-354.

17.

Collins BS, Battaglia LL. 2002. Mircroenvironmental heterogeneity and Quercus michauxii regeneration in experimental gaps. Forest Ecol Mange 155: 279-290.

18.

Collins BS, Pickett TA. 1987. Influence of canopy opening on the environment and herb layer in a northern hardwood forest. Vegetatio 70: 3-10.

19.

Dietze MC, Clark JS. 2008. Changing the gap dynamics paradigm: vegetative regeneration control on forest response to disturbance. Ecol Monogr 78: 331-347.

20.

Duncan RS, Chapman CA. 1999. Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in tropical Africa. Ecol Appl 9: 998-1008.

21.

Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP. 1999. Gap light analyzer (GLA), version 2.0: imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Frazer University, Burnaby, BC, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY.

22.

Gray AN, Spies TA. 1996. Gap size, within-gap position and canopy structure effects on conifer seedling establishment. J Ecol 84: 635-645.

23.

Gyeongsangbuk-do. 1999. 100 years of forest erosion control in Gyeongsangbuk- do, Korea. Deagu, Gyeongsangbuk-do. (in Korean, the title is translated by authors)

24.

Haugo RD, Halpern CB. 2007. Vegetation responses to conifer encroachment in a dry, montane meadow: a chronosequence approach. Can J Bot 85: 285-298.

25.

Hong SC. 1982. A study on the forest ecology in Young-il soil erosion control district. Jour Korean For Soc 58: 41-47. (in Korean with English abstract)

26.

Huth F, Wagner S. 2006. Gap structure and establishment of silver birch regeneration (Betula pendula Roth.) in Norway spruce stands (Picea abies L. Karst.). For Ecol Manage 229: 314-324.

27.

Inman FM, Wentworth TR, Groom M, Brownie C, Lea R. 2007. Using artificial canopy gaps to restore Puerto Rican Parrot (Amazona vittata) habitat in tropical timber plantations. For Ecol Manage 243: 169-177.

28.

Jin Y, Lee DG. 2000. Growth characteristics and physiological adaptation of Pinus densiflora seedlings in the canopy gap. Jour Korean For Soc 89: 452-460. (in Korean with English abstract)

29.

Kim JU, Kil BS. 1983. A study on the distribution of Pinus thunbergii in the Korean Peninsula. Korean J Ecol 6: 45-54. (in Korean with English abstract)

30.

Kim JW, Lee YK. 2006. Classification and Assessment of Plant Communities. Worldscience, Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)

31.

Kim SH, Lee KJ, Kim GB. 2002. Allelopathic effect of black pine (Pinus thunbergii) on black locust (Robinia pseudo-acacia L.) in coastal forest. Jour Korean For Soc 91: 362-371. (in Korean with English abstract)

32.

Korea Forest Service. 2003. Korean Plant Names Index. http://koreaplants.go.kr:9101. Accessed 11 February 2009.

33.

Korea National Arboretum. 2004. Illustrated Grasses of Korea. Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon-si. (in Korean)

34.

Kruskal JB. 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 115-129.

35.

Lee TB. 1999. Illustrated Flora of Korea. Hyangmoonsa, Seoul. (in Korean)

36.

Masaki T, Suzuki W, Niiyama K, Iida S, Tanaka H, Nakashizuka T. 1992. Community structure of a species-rich temperate forest, Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan. Vegetatio 98: 97-111.

37.

Matsuda K. 1989. Survival and growth of konara oak (Quercus serrata Thunb.) Seedlings in an abandoned coppice forest. Ecol Res 4: 309-321.

38.

McCune B, Grace JB. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Ore.

39.

McCune B, Mefford MJ. 1999. PC-ORD. Version 4.0. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Ore.

40.

Moore MR, Vankat JL. 1986. Responses of the herb layer to the gap dynamics of mature beech-maple forest. Am Midl Nat 115: 336-347.

41.

Murai H, Ishikawa M, Endo J, Tadaki R. 1992. The Coastal Forest in Japan. Soft Science Inc, Tokyo. (in Japanese)

42.

Park SH. 1995. Colored Illustrations of Naturalized Plants of Korea. Ilchokak, Seoul. (in Korean)

43.

Putz FE. 1983. Treefall pits and mounds, buried seeds, and the importance of disturbed soil to pioneer trees on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 64: 1069-1074.

44.

Runkle JR. 1979. Gap phase dynamics in climax mesic forests. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

45.

Runkle JR. 1981. Gap regeneration in some old-growth forest of the eastern North America. Ecology 63: 1533-1546.

46.

Runkle JR. 1985. Disturbance regimes in temperate forest. In: The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (Pickett STA, White PS, eds). Academic Press, New York, U.S.A, pp 17-33.

47.

Runkle JR. 1992. Guidelines and Sample Protocol for Sampling Forest Gaps. USDA Forest Service PNW-GTR-283.

48.

Schaetzl RJ, Burns SF, Johnson DL, Small TW. 1989. Tree uprooting: review of impacts on forest ecology. Vegetatio 79: 165-176.

49.

Underwood AJ. 1997. Experiments in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

50.

van der Maarel E. 1988. Vegetation dynamics: patterns in time and space. Vegetatio 77: 7-19.

51.

van der Meer PJ, Dignan P, Savaneh AG. 1999. Effect of gap size on seedling establishment, growth and survival at three years in mountain ash forest in Victoria, Australia. For Ecol Manage 117: 33-42.

52.

Watt AS. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. J Ecol 35: 1-22.

53.

Wayne PM, Bazzaz FA. 1993. Birch seedling response to daily time course of light in experimental forest gaps and shadehouses. Ecology 74: 1500-1511.

54.

York RA, Battles JJ, Heald RC. 2003. Edge effects in mixed conifer group selection openings: tree height response to resource gradients. For Ecol Manage 179: 107-121.

55.

Zhu J, Matsuzaki T, Lee F, Gonda Y. 2003. Effect of gap size created by thinning on seedling emergency, survival and establishment in a coastal pine forest. For Ecol Manage 182: 339-354.

Journal of Ecology and Environment