바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

ISSN : 2287-8327

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.33 No.1

Citation Share

A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Productivity of Zostera marina

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2010, v.33 no.1, pp.59-65

Wen-Tao Li (Pusan National University)


Wen-Tao, L. , & (2010). A Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Productivity of Zostera marina. Journal of Ecology and Environment, 33(1), 59-65.

Abstract

Because seagrass production significantly contributes to the biodiversity and production of coastal and estuarine ecosystems, accurate estimation of seagrass productivity is a critical step toward understanding the ecological roles of seagrass in these ecosystems. To develop an accurate and effective method of measuring seagrass productivity,we estimated leaf productivity of eelgrass (Zostera marina) on the southern coast of Korea using three methods, the conventional leaf marking method, the elongation-mass method (Short ’87 method), and the plastochrone method. In each season, shoots were pierced through the bundle sheath using a hypodermic needle and were collected after 2-4 weeks had elapsed to estimate their productivity. The leaf elongation and the leaf plastochrone intervals varied significantly among seasons. On an annual basis, the conventional leaf marking method showed the lowest leaf productivity estimates compared to the elongation-mass method and the plastochrone method, suggesting that the conventional leaf marking method underestimated leaf productivity as it ignored leaf maturation processes and new leaf growth within the sheath. Since the elongation-mass method considered leaf maturation processes, this method produced higher leaf productivity estimates than the conventional leaf marking method. On an annual basis, the plastochrone method produced the highest leaf productivity estimates. Below-ground productivity, which can be easily estimated using the plastochrone method, ranged between 3.29 and 5.73 (mg dry weight shoot-1 day-1) and accounted for about 17.8% to 30.3% of total productivity. Because of the high contributions of below-ground productivity to total seagrass production, we suggest that the plastochrone method is an effective and simple technique for assessing both above- and below-ground productivities.

keywords
leaf elongation, leaf plastochrone interval, productivity measurement, seagrass, Zostera marina

Reference

1.

Bédhomme AL, Thélin I, Boudouresque CF. 1983. Mesure de la production primaire des feuilles de Posidonia oceanica: Modifications de la méthode de Zieman. Bot Mar 26: 35-43.

2.

Blackburn TH, Nedwell DB, Weibe WJ. 1994. Active mineral cycling in a Jamaican seagrass sediment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 110: 233-239.

3.

Brouns JJWM. 1985. The plastochrone interval method for the study of the productivity of seagrasses: Possibilities and limitations. Aquat Bot 21: 71-88.

4.

Dennison WC. 1990a. Leaf production. In RC Phillips, CP McRoy, eds, Seagrass Research Methods, Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, 9, UNESCO, Paris, pp 77-79.

5.

Dennison WC. 1990b. Rhizome/root production. In Seagrass Research Methods (Phillips RC, McRoy CP, eds). Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, 9, UNESCO, Paris, pp 81-82.

6.

Dennison WC, Aller RC, Alberte RS. 1985. Sediment ammonium availability and eelgrass (Zostera marina) growth. Mar Biol 94: 469-477.

7.

Gaeckle JL, Short FT. 2002. A plastochrone method for measuring leaf growth in eelgrass, Zostera marina L. Bull Mar Sci 71: 1237-1246.

8.

Heck Jr KL, Able KW, Roman CT, Fahay MP. 1995. Composition, abundance, biomass, and production of macrofauna in a New England estuary – comparisons among eelgrass meadows and other nursery habitats. Estuaries 18: 379-389.

9.

Holmquist JG, Powell GVN, Sogard SM. 1989. Decapod and stomatopod assemblages on a system of seagrass-covered mud banks in Florida Bay. Mar Biol 100: 473-483.

10.

Ibarra-Obando SE, Boudouresque CF. 1994. An improvement of the Zieman leaf marking technique for Zostera marina growth and production assessment. Aquat Bot 47: 293-302.

11.

Jacobs RPWM. 1979. Distribution and aspects of the production and biomass of eelgrass Zostera marina L., at Roscoff, France. Aquat Bot 7: 151-172.

12.

Kemp M, Murray L, McRoy CP. 1990. Primary productivity. In Seagrass Research Methods (Phillips RC, McRoy CP, eds). Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, 9, UNESCO, Paris, pp. 153-159.

13.

Kentula ME, McIntire CD. 1986. The autecology and production dynamics of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in Netarts Bay, Oregon. Estuaries 9: 188-199.

14.

Lee K-S. 2004. Production assessment of eelgrass, Zostera marina using the plastochrone method compared with the conventional leaf marking technique. J Korean Soc Oceanogr 39: 186-196.

15.

Lee K-S, Park SR, Kim J-B. 2005. Production dynamics of the eelgrass, Zostera marina in two bay systems on the south coast of the Korean peninsula. Mar Biol 147: 1091-1108.

16.

McComb AJ, Cambridge ML, Kirkman H, Kuo J. 1981. The biology of Australian seagrass. In The Biology of Australian Plants (Pate JS, McComb AJ, eds) University of Western Australia Press, pp 258-293.

17.

Montague CL, Ley JA. 1993. A possible effect of salinity fluctuation on abundance of benthic vegetation and associated fauna in northeastern Florida Bay. Estuaries 16: 703-717.

18.

Nienhuis PH, de Bree BHH. 1980. Production and growth dynamics of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in brackish Lake Grevelingen (The Netherlands). Netherlands J Sea Res 14:102-118.

19.

Park SR. 2008. Production dynamics of three Zostera species on the southern coast of the Korean peninsula. Ph.D. thesis. Pusan National University, Pusan

20.

Park SR, Kim J-H, Kang C-K, An S, Chung IK, Kim JH, Lee K-S. 2009. Current status and ecological roles of Zostera marina after recovery from large-scale reclamation in the Nakdong River estuary, Korea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:38-48.

21.

Patriquin D. 1973. Estimation of growth rate, production and age of the marine angiosperm Thalassia testudinum König. Carb J Sci 13: 1-2.

22.

Robertson AI, Mann KH. 1984. Disturbance by ice and lifehistory adaptations of the seagrass Zostera marina. Mar Biol 80: 131-141.

23.

Robertson EL. 1984. Seagrasses. In The Marine Benthic Flora of Southern Australia Plant 1. South Australia (HBS Womersley, ed). Government Printer, pp 57-122.

24.

Roman CT, Able KW. 1988. Production ecology of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in a Cape Cod salt marsh–estuarine system, Massachusetts. Aquat Bot 32: 353-363.

25.

Sand-Jensen K. 1975. Biomass, net production and growth dynamics in an eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) population in Vellerup Vig, Denmark. Ophelia 14: 185-201.

26.

Short FT. 1987. Effects of sediment nutrients on seagrasses: Literature review and mesocosm experiment. Aquat Bot 27: 41-57.

27.

Short FT, Duarte CM. 2001. Methods for the measurement of seagrass growth and production. In Global Seagrass Research Methods (Short FT, Coles RG, eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 154-182.

28.

Vizzini S, Sarà G, Michener RH, Mazzola A. 2002. The role and contribution of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile organic matter for secondary consumers as revealed by carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis. Acta Oecol 23: 277-285.

29.

Zieman JC. 1974. Methods for the study of the growth and production of turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum König. Aquaculture 4 139-143.

30.

Zieman JC. 1975. Quantitative and dynamic aspects of the ecology of turtle grass, Thalassia testudinum. In Estuarine Research, Vol. 1 (Cronin LE, ed). Academic Press, New York, pp 541–562.

Journal of Ecology and Environment

e-Submission OA Policy