바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN2287-8327
  • E-ISSN2288-1220
  • SCOPUS, KCI

The Spatial Distribution of Quercus mongolica and Its Association with Other Tree Species in Two Quercus mongolica Stands in Mt. Jiri, Korea

Journal of Ecology and Environment / Journal of Ecology and Environment, (P)2287-8327; (E)2288-1220
2010, v.33 no.1, pp.67-77






Abstract

Stand structure and spatial associations of the dominant tree species in Quercus mongolica stands were investigated to understand interspecific relationships and the persistent dominance of Q. mongolica. We examined the species composition, DBH (diameter at breast height) distribution, and spatial distribution of trees (≥ 2.5 cm DBH) in two permanent 100 m x 100 m plots in Q. mongolica-dominant stands on the western part of Mt. Jiri. Ripley’s K-function was used to characterize the spatial patterns and associations of dominant tree species. Q. mongolica showed a continuous and reverse-J shaped DBH distribution with clumped spatial distribution in both study sites. Q. mongolica and Abies koreana exhibited a negative association implying potential interspecific competition. The positive spatial association between Q. mongolica and Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica and Fraxinus sieboldiana were affected by site characteristics: limited habitat conditions with a large proportion of rock surface. Our results suggest that interactions among species were complex and ranged from positive to negative. Differences in stand and site characteristics and regeneration mechanisms among the species play an important role in regulating their spatial distribution patterns, while competition between individuals also contributes to spatial patterning of these communities. The high density and the early developmental stage of spatial distribution and structural characteristics of Q. mongolica and the relatively low importance values of other species in the stands imply that Q. mongolica will remain dominant in the study sites in the near future.

keywords
clumped distribution, interspecific association, stand structure, sprouting

Reference

1.

Abrams MD, Copenheaver CA, Terazawa K, Umeki K, Takiya M, Akashi N. 1999. A 370-year dendroecological history of an old-growth Abies-Acer-Quercus forest in Hokkaido, northern Japan. Can J For Res 29: 1891-1899.

2.

Ahn H-C, Lee J-H. 1998. Vegetation structure and dynamics of a Betula davurica forest in Mt. Chiri. J Korean For Soc 87(3): 445-458.

3.

Anderson M. 1992. Spatial analysis of two-species interaction. Oecologia 91: 134-140.

4.

Besag J. 1977. Contribution to the discussion on Dr. Ripley’s paper. J Royal Stat Soc B 39:193-195.

5.

Chung MY, Chung MG. 2004. Spatial genetic structure in populations of Quercus mongolica var. grosseserrata (Fagaceae) from southern Korea. Can J Bot 82: 1402-1408.

6.

Clark PJ, Evans FC. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445-453.

7.

Greig-Smith P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley.

8.

Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the Prairie-Forest Border Region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32: 476-496.

9.

Dolezal J, Song J-S, Altman J, Janecek S, Cerny T, Srutek M, Kolbek J. 2009. Tree growth and competition in a postlogging Quercus mongolica forest on Mt. Sobaek, South Korea. Ecol Res 24: 281-290.

10.

Fajardo A, Alaback P. 2005. Effects of natural and human disturbances on the dynamics and spatial structure of Nothofagus glauca in south-central Chile. J Biogeography 32: 1811-1825.

11.

Haase P. 1995. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley’s K-function: Introduction and methods of edge correction. J Veg Sci 6: 575-572.

12.

Haase P. 2001. Can isotropy vs. anisotropy in the spatial association of plant species resolve physical vs. biotic facilitation? J Veg Sci 12: 127-136.

13.

Haase P. 2004. SPPA Version 2.0.3. http://haasep.homepage. t-online.de/frm_strt.htm. Accessed on 3 September 2007.

14.

Hao Z, Zhang J, Song B, Ye J, Li B. 2007. Vertical structure and spatial associations of dominant tree species in an old growth temperate forest. For Ecol Manage 252: 1-11.

15.

Hardin G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science 131: 1292-1297.

16.

Jang YS, Yim YJ. 1985. Vegetation types and their structures of the Piagol, Mt. Chiri. Korean J Bot 28: 165-175.

17.

Kim JH, Kuen KH. 1991. Analysis of inter-species association and covariation in a natural deciduous forest. Jour Korean For Soc 80: 360-368.

18.

Korea Meteorological Administration. 2008. Annual Climatological Report. Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul. http://minwon.kma.go.kr/index.jsp. Accessed on 5 Decemeber 2008.

19.

Korea National Park Service. 2008. Jirisan National Park. http://jiri.knps.or.kr. Accessed on 10 February 2008.

20.

Lee KJ, Lee SJ. 2001. Planting and Management Technique for Ornamental Trees. Seoul National University Press, Seoul.

21.

Leemans R. 1991. Canopy gaps and establishment patterns of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in two old-growth coniferous forests in central Sweden. Plant Ecol 93: 157-165.

22.

Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. 1988. Statistical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

23.

Miyaki M, Kikuzawa K. 1988 Dispersal of Quercus mongolica acorns in a broadleaved deciduous forest 2. Scatterhoarding by Mice. For Ecol Manage 25: 9-16.

24.

Morisita M. 1962. Iσ-Index, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Pop Ecol 4: 1-7.

25.

Monzeglio U, Stoll P. 2005. Spatial patterns and species performances in experimental plant communities. Oecologia 145: 619-628.

26.

Park K-W, Chung S-H. 1990. Plant ecological studies of burned field at the high mountain region-especially at Cheisuk-bong (1806 m) area in Mt. Chiri-. Jour Korean For Soc 79(1): 33-41.

27.

Park PS, Song JI, Kim MP, Park HK. 2006. Stand structure change in different aged stands along altitudinal gradients in the western part of Mt. Chiri. Jour Korean For Soc 95(1): 102-112.

28.

Peterson CJ, Squiers ER. 1995. An unexpected change in spatial pattern across 10 years in an aspen-white-pine forest. Ecology 83: 847-855.

29.

Pielou EC. 1960. A Single Mechanism to Account for Regular, Random and Aggregated Populations. J Ecol 48: 575-584.

30.

Ripley BD. 1977. Modeling spatial patterns. J Royal Stat Soc B 39: 172-212.

31.

Salas C, LeMay V, Nunez P, Pacheco P, Espinosa A. 2006. Spatial patterns in an old-growth Nothofagus obliqua forest in south-central Chile. For Ecol Manage 231: 38-46.

32.

Song H-K, Lee M-K, Yee S, Kim H-Y, Ji Y-U, Kwon O-W. 2003. Vegetation structures and ecological niche of Quercus mongolica forests. Jour Korean For Soc 92(4): 409-420.

33.

Song JI. 2007. Spatial patterns in Quercus mogolica forests in the Western part of Mt. Chiri. Thesis. Seoul National University, Seoul.

34.

Suh MH, Lee DK. 1998. Stand structure and regeneration of Quercus mongolica forests in Korea. For Ecol Manage 106: 27-34.

35.

Venable DL, Brown JS. 1988. The Selective Interactions of Dispersal, Dormancy, and Seed Size as Adaptations for Reducing Risk in Variable Environments. Am Nat 131(3): 360-384.

36.

Yang HM, Kim JH. 2002. Application of forest community attributes to the ecological forest management. Jour Korean For Soc 91(4): 545-553.

37.

Yim Y-J, Kim JU. 1992. The Vegetation of Mt. Chiri National Park – a Study of Flora and Vegetation. Chung-Ang Univestiry Press, Seoul.

Journal of Ecology and Environment